(08-05-2022 07:50 AM)chuckk3 Wrote:  I don't know why a LaTech fan would want to post over there at all. I've tried it, been respectful...over-consciously so...and basically was shown the door, to put it nicely. "La Tech" in one's profile "I Root For:..." is a lightning rod for about 3 schools' fans.

It's so bad, the "SBC-3" posters, with whom we had ZERO issues as conference mates for 10 YEARS are scared to death to even say, "Look, I know y'all had your issues in the past, but we got to know Tech pretty well, and we had NO issues with them. Y'all need dial that diatribe back a little."

Too bad really. With all the flux (and occasional REFLUX ) going on in conferences, it would be nice to have an adult conversation with folks in other neighborhoods.

I actually did say something along these lines. Specifically stating that I like Tech and enjoyed our time together. Hence the reason I still visit this board. I like a number of schools that remain in CUSA that I still plan to follow and root for.

(08-05-2022 10:47 AM)Curtisc83 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 10:29 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 09:45 AM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 09:17 AM)JackedUp Wrote:  It’s really no point to have any kind of rational discussion on the SBC board.

Anyone can tell it’s an insular message board where differing opinions are rejected and ridiculed. It’s so bad over there they have promoted a flat out falsity about their Media deal as fact.

That’s first thing I noticed when I started looking at this message board last year.

A great case study in insular groupthink could be done on the Sunbelt Message board. And how it distorts reality and perspective.

Call it what you want. You're one of very few who are still caught up in the SBC media deal and how much it's worth. You've been given countless links, articles, and press releases about it, but you keep putting your head in the sand each time.

It's a lesson on how to create a problem. Very few people even knew anything about the media rights deal to begin with. A few SBC posters made mention of it and this guy went on an egotistical rampage about it, dragging in multiple CUSA and SBC posters. Now all of the sudden everyone cares about it as if it's some kind of rivalry. One dude made all of this happen and has clogged up both boards for months. He's banned from one, not at all for having a "difference of opinion". This entire tornado is his fault. I'm not talking about the SBC3 coming over here and trolling, I'm talking about his constant badgering about the media deal, and his incessant posts about the SBC meant to inflame SBC posters and drag them into a fight.

Why is the media deal that big of a deal? Its not like it even covers the cost of ones FB program. The only deal I would want from ESPN for CUSA is to have as many games on the air as possible, the money doesn't matter to me. FB is more a marketing tool for G5 schools anyway.

PS: The SBC should get more money for any TV deal than CUSA since yall have more established FBS programs coming in. We will have FCS callups and are pretty much starting over. But the money is meh anyways.

I've been saying this for years. TV money at the G5 level is not a big part of a decent athletic budget. Increasing ticket sales/concessions, licensing deals, and donations would have a much larger impact on a schools athletic budget that the money from a G5 TV deal. I've always advocated for exposure over money. I would gladly give up any and all money for CUSA's TV deal, in exchange for exposure and more importantly promotion from the major networks. Sure, it's nice to have both, but I will take the exposure/promotion over money.

(08-05-2022 11:11 AM)ODU2011 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 07:50 AM)chuckk3 Wrote:  I don't know why a LaTech fan would want to post over there at all. I've tried it, been respectful...over-consciously so...and basically was shown the door, to put it nicely. "La Tech" in one's profile "I Root For:..." is a lightning rod for about 3 schools' fans.

It's so bad, the "SBC-3" posters, with whom we had ZERO issues as conference mates for 10 YEARS are scared to death to even say, "Look, I know y'all had your issues in the past, but we got to know Tech pretty well, and we had NO issues with them. Y'all need dial that diatribe back a little."

Too bad really. With all the flux (and occasional REFLUX ) going on in conferences, it would be nice to have an adult conversation with folks in other neighborhoods.

I actually did say something along these lines. Specifically stating that I like Tech and enjoyed our time together. Hence the reason I still visit this board. I like a number of schools that remain in CUSA that I still plan to follow and root for.

I certainly enjoyed Tech being conference mates with ODU. Our basketball history goes WAY back. WAYYYY back. Wish we coulda played football more often, but that's what happens in a league of 14 schools, I guess.

Cheers to the Monarchs! Best wishes in your new home.

(08-05-2022 09:50 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 09:45 AM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 09:17 AM)JackedUp Wrote:  It’s really no point to have any kind of rational discussion on the SBC board.

Anyone can tell it’s an insular message board where differing opinions are rejected and ridiculed. It’s so bad over there they have promoted a flat out falsity about their Media deal as fact.

That’s first thing I noticed when I started looking at this message board last year.

A great case study in insular groupthink could be done on the Sunbelt Message board. And how it distorts reality and perspective.

Call it what you want. You're one of very few who are still caught up in the SBC media deal and how much it's worth. You've been given countless links, articles, and press releases about it, but you keep putting your head in the sand each time.

And yes, it's fully known you won't accept anything less than an official press release from ESPN stating the numbers. Will you ever stop worrying about it?

(08-05-2022 09:24 AM)JackedUp Wrote:  That’s what happens when the moderators ban anyone with differing opinions.

It becomes a bastion for insular groupthink distorting reality and perspectives.

CUSA moderators please don’t ban these Sunbelt posters Cardinalblacktrojan, Frankyp. Even though they resort to childish insults they should be allow to post their opinions

I think all perspectives should be welcomed, lets not become like the Sunbelt Board

I think MTPiKapp may be correct. You really can't help yourself. I'm curious to know the number of times you bring up the SBC in threads over here that have absolutely nothing to do with the SBC.

Yeah but he is one poster. Have you seen the SBC board. They dedicate nine page threads to trashing CUSA.. And as filler they throw in trashing the AAC. It’s one ball of insecurity over there.

Well, if you’re referring to the ‘other conf media days’ thread, here’s a run down on what happened on that one:

It was pretty quiet until P2 or 3 when you and the rustond guy posted some pretty inflammatory posts on it, which generated a whole lot of responses and ‘pages’ to the thread.

Then you came here and laughed at us for how many pages we were posting about just cusa.

Then you went back to the SBC thread and deleted most of the posts you made that had stirred everything up in the first place. Luckily, though, you can’t delete the ones where folks quoted you, so several of them remain. Kind of odd indeed that you deleted most of the of the ones you had originally posted.

So, the main reason that thread had so many ‘pages’ was almost entirely because you and the other LTU guy went in early and stirred it all up.

That sums up that thread pretty well.

(08-05-2022 11:31 AM)chuckk3 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 11:11 AM)ODU2011 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 07:50 AM)chuckk3 Wrote:  I don't know why a LaTech fan would want to post over there at all. I've tried it, been respectful...over-consciously so...and basically was shown the door, to put it nicely. "La Tech" in one's profile "I Root For:..." is a lightning rod for about 3 schools' fans.

It's so bad, the "SBC-3" posters, with whom we had ZERO issues as conference mates for 10 YEARS are scared to death to even say, "Look, I know y'all had your issues in the past, but we got to know Tech pretty well, and we had NO issues with them. Y'all need dial that diatribe back a little."

Too bad really. With all the flux (and occasional REFLUX ) going on in conferences, it would be nice to have an adult conversation with folks in other neighborhoods.

I actually did say something along these lines. Specifically stating that I like Tech and enjoyed our time together. Hence the reason I still visit this board. I like a number of schools that remain in CUSA that I still plan to follow and root for.

I certainly enjoyed Tech being conference mates with ODU. Our basketball history goes WAY back. WAYYYY back. Wish we coulda played football more often, but that's what happens in a league of 14 schools, I guess.

Cheers to the Monarchs! Best wishes in your new home.

Agreed. I really enjoyed the basketball games. Also enjoyed the few football games.

Cheers!

(08-05-2022 07:50 AM)chuckk3 Wrote:  It's so bad, the "SBC-3" posters, with whom we had ZERO issues as conference mates for 10 YEARS are scared to death to even say, "Look, I know y'all had your issues in the past, but we got to know Tech pretty well, and we had NO issues with them. Y'all need dial that diatribe back a little."

Too bad really. With all the flux (and occasional REFLUX ) going on in conferences, it would be nice to have an adult conversation with folks in other neighborhoods.

I try to judge by whats being said, not who the poster roots for. ( except JSU fans, I discriminate against them 100%)
The same thing happens over on this side of the fence too.
I've tried a few nice informative post, adding to the discussion, and got ridiculed and told to go back where I came from. Now if I come over for a look-see and decide to post I try to get a reaction. Because I'm part of the SB3 any opinion I have will automatically be discounted and ridiculed anyway. Why not stir it up a bit?

Rarely have posted anything on the SBC board and rarely read the board. Maybe once a month or two I will look at it but not much need to keep up.
No need to post on their board. SBC posters need to post here to try to convince themselves the conference improved. CUSA posters have no need to do this on the SBC board you dont post much on lower level conference boards.

Amazing how much someone's perspective can change in less than a year...

CUSA's future upon the news of Marshall leaving...

(09-13-2021 11:10 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Guess the CUSA, WAC and ASUN will merger.

On what the future of the SBC could be with JMU, Marshall, and App St...

(09-13-2021 11:05 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Long term JMU would be a better addition than Southern Miss. If you get pass the FCS label and look long term JMU is a trend up school and program while USM is trending down. Marshall would be the only one of the four I would rank higher in long term potential. JMU, Marshall and App St would give SBC a dominate foothold in their area and a high degree of interest for G5 programs.

On how JSU felt about a possible Sun Belt invite should one come their way...

(09-30-2021 07:48 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  But with all of this said do not believe JSU is getting invited to any current FBS conference. Troy would block SBC and UAB would block CUSA if JSU was even brought up. JSU would accept an invite from any FBS conference IMO. Most likely would jerk their arm off taking it from them.

On the direction the Sun Belt is moving...

(10-09-2021 09:36 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Maybe but the SBC has been trending up in football performance just dont understanding adding a program who will hurt your progression. I guess if your wanting in MS they are the only choice.

On what CUSA should do to send a message to the Sun Belt and make them "battle like hell" in recruiting, something I wouldn't think CUSA would worry about if the SBC is so much worse...

(10-22-2021 11:28 PM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Not sure I would not go straight into SBC territory.
EKU
Kennesaw
McNeese
West FL
Jackson St
JSU
NC AT
Add these schools at the SBC would be having to battle like hell in recruiting. Probably not the most reasonable long term but it would send a message.

(08-05-2022 02:05 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  Amazing how much someone's perspective can change in less than a year...

CUSA's future upon the news of Marshall leaving...

(09-13-2021 11:10 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Guess the CUSA, WAC and ASUN will merger.

On what the future of the SBC could be with JMU, Marshall, and App St...

(09-13-2021 11:05 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Long term JMU would be a better addition than Southern Miss. If you get pass the FCS label and look long term JMU is a trend up school and program while USM is trending down. Marshall would be the only one of the four I would rank higher in long term potential. JMU, Marshall and App St would give SBC a dominate foothold in their area and a high degree of interest for G5 programs.

On how JSU felt about a possible Sun Belt invite should one come their way...

(09-30-2021 07:48 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  But with all of this said do not believe JSU is getting invited to any current FBS conference. Troy would block SBC and UAB would block CUSA if JSU was even brought up. JSU would accept an invite from any FBS conference IMO. Most likely would jerk their arm off taking it from them.

On the direction the Sun Belt is moving...

(10-09-2021 09:36 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Maybe but the SBC has been trending up in football performance just dont understanding adding a program who will hurt your progression. I guess if your wanting in MS they are the only choice.

On what CUSA should do to send a message to the Sun Belt and make them "battle like hell" in recruiting, something I wouldn't think CUSA would worry about if the SBC is so much worse...

(10-22-2021 11:28 PM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Not sure I would not go straight into SBC territory.
EKU
Kennesaw
McNeese
West FL
Jackson St
JSU
NC AT
Add these schools at the SBC would be having to battle like hell in recruiting. Probably not the most reasonable long term but it would send a message.

Well done Sir...Well done...

(08-05-2022 10:47 AM)Curtisc83 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 10:29 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 09:45 AM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 09:17 AM)JackedUp Wrote:  It’s really no point to have any kind of rational discussion on the SBC board.

Anyone can tell it’s an insular message board where differing opinions are rejected and ridiculed. It’s so bad over there they have promoted a flat out falsity about their Media deal as fact.

That’s first thing I noticed when I started looking at this message board last year.

A great case study in insular groupthink could be done on the Sunbelt Message board. And how it distorts reality and perspective.

Call it what you want. You're one of very few who are still caught up in the SBC media deal and how much it's worth. You've been given countless links, articles, and press releases about it, but you keep putting your head in the sand each time.

It's a lesson on how to create a problem. Very few people even knew anything about the media rights deal to begin with. A few SBC posters made mention of it and this guy went on an egotistical rampage about it, dragging in multiple CUSA and SBC posters. Now all of the sudden everyone cares about it as if it's some kind of rivalry. One dude made all of this happen and has clogged up both boards for months. He's banned from one, not at all for having a "difference of opinion". This entire tornado is his fault. I'm not talking about the SBC3 coming over here and trolling, I'm talking about his constant badgering about the media deal, and his incessant posts about the SBC meant to inflame SBC posters and drag them into a fight.

Why is the media deal that big of a deal? Its not like it even covers the cost of ones FB program. The only deal I would want from ESPN for CUSA is to have as many games on the air as possible, the money doesn't matter to me. FB is more a marketing tool for G5 schools anyway.

PS: The SBC should get more money for any TV deal than CUSA since yall have more established FBS programs coming in. We will have FCS callups and are pretty much starting over. But the money is meh anyways.

Hey Liberty I totally agree. It’s peanuts especially if it’s an ESPN contract because are ESPN is requiring these G5 conferences to pay production costs for content on their streaming platforms ESPN+, ESPN3

Go look at the Knight database and even the AAC schools were only making a fraction of their 7 million dollar annual contract.
The production cost are substantial and benefit ESPN more than the actual G5 conferences. ESPN gets content pennies on the dollar for these G5 conferences Sunbelt, MAC, AAC.

The point is that these Sunbelt posters have consistently lied about the media deal. Zero evidence of 2million ESPN Sunbelt deal, We all know the SBC AD’s would have announced increased like that Day 1

(08-05-2022 09:45 AM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 09:17 AM)JackedUp Wrote:  It’s really no point to have any kind of rational discussion on the SBC board.

Anyone can tell it’s an insular message board where differing opinions are rejected and ridiculed. It’s so bad over there they have promoted a flat out falsity about their Media deal as fact.

That’s first thing I noticed when I started looking at this message board last year.

A great case study in insular groupthink could be done on the Sunbelt Message board. And how it distorts reality and perspective.

Call it what you want. You're one of very few who are still caught up in the SBC media deal and how much it's worth. You've been given countless links, articles, and press releases about it, but you keep putting your head in the sand each time.

And yes, it's fully known you won't accept anything less than an official press release from ESPN stating the numbers. Will you ever stop worrying about it?

(08-05-2022 09:24 AM)JackedUp Wrote:  That’s what happens when the moderators ban anyone with differing opinions.

It becomes a bastion for insular groupthink distorting reality and perspectives.

CUSA moderators please don’t ban these Sunbelt posters Cardinalblacktrojan, Frankyp. Even though they resort to childish insults they should be allow to post their opinions

I think all perspectives should be welcomed, lets not become like the Sunbelt Board

I think MTPiKapp may be correct. You really can't help yourself. I'm curious to know the number of times you bring up the SBC in threads over here that have absolutely nothing to do with the SBC.

Show these countless links please? (Not the JMU misspoke article)

The Same JMU reference gets repeated over and over again. The JMU athletic dept confirmed that the 2 million was total conference revenue and he had misspoke about it being a media deal.

There has been absolutely zero evidence of this deal.

(08-05-2022 01:09 PM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Rarely have posted anything on the SBC board and rarely read the board. Maybe once a month or two I will look at it but not much need to keep up.
No need to post on their board. SBC posters need to post here to try to convince themselves the conference improved. CUSA posters have no need to do this on the SBC board you dont post much on lower level conference boards.

You just can't help yourself, can you? You couldn't even finish your comment without the urge of throwing some sort of shade toward the SBC.

I should find the recent clip where Rich Rod did a video interview, saying he would've "preferred" the SBC... or would you rather me not bring that up?

(08-05-2022 02:52 PM)JackedUp Wrote:  The point is that these Sunbelt posters have consistently lied about the media deal. Zero evidence of 2million ESPN Sunbelt deal, We all know the SBC AD’s would have announced increased like that Day 1

So we've lied... despite referencing sources from The Athletic, The Daily News-Record, and The Virginian-Pilot. Hmm.

You have an unhealthy obsession.

(08-05-2022 03:14 PM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 01:09 PM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Rarely have posted anything on the SBC board and rarely read the board. Maybe once a month or two I will look at it but not much need to keep up.
No need to post on their board. SBC posters need to post here to try to convince themselves the conference improved. CUSA posters have no need to do this on the SBC board you dont post much on lower level conference boards.

You just can't help yourself, can you? You couldn't even finish your comment without the urge of throwing some sort of shade toward the SBC.

I should find the recent clip where Rich Rod did a video interview, saying he would've "preferred" the SBC... or would you rather me not bring that up?

(08-05-2022 02:52 PM)JackedUp Wrote:  The point is that these Sunbelt posters have consistently lied about the media deal. Zero evidence of 2million ESPN Sunbelt deal, We all know the SBC AD’s would have announced increased like that Day 1

So we've lied... despite referencing sources from The Athletic, The Daily News-Record, and The Virginian-Pilot. Hmm.

You have an unhealthy obsession.

Let’s see them chief?

All those articles reference the JMU official that mistakenly referred to Total Conference revenue as Media Revenue

I know The Daily News Record is the JMU local paper that again referenced the same mistaken JMU official that corrected his statememt

Still there are 0 news releases from SBC Schools referencing this 2 million ESPN deal.

Why did the AAC6 release the day they joined the conference the financial details? Because it was a substantial increase. But yet the SBC3 and remaining SBC remain quite. It’s obvious the ULM poster was correct

(08-05-2022 03:48 PM)JackedUp Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 03:14 PM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 01:09 PM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Rarely have posted anything on the SBC board and rarely read the board. Maybe once a month or two I will look at it but not much need to keep up.
No need to post on their board. SBC posters need to post here to try to convince themselves the conference improved. CUSA posters have no need to do this on the SBC board you dont post much on lower level conference boards.

You just can't help yourself, can you? You couldn't even finish your comment without the urge of throwing some sort of shade toward the SBC.

I should find the recent clip where Rich Rod did a video interview, saying he would've "preferred" the SBC... or would you rather me not bring that up?

(08-05-2022 02:52 PM)JackedUp Wrote:  The point is that these Sunbelt posters have consistently lied about the media deal. Zero evidence of 2million ESPN Sunbelt deal, We all know the SBC AD’s would have announced increased like that Day 1

So we've lied... despite referencing sources from The Athletic, The Daily News-Record, and The Virginian-Pilot. Hmm.

You have an unhealthy obsession.

Let’s see them chief?

All those articles reference the JMU official that mistakenly referred to Total Conference revenue as Media Revenue

I know The Daily News Record is the JMU local paper that again referenced the same mistaken JMU official that corrected his statememt

Still there are 0 news releases from SBC Schools referencing this 2 million ESPN deal.

Why did the AAC6 release the day they joined the conference the financial details? Because it was a substantial increase. But yet the SBC3 and remaining SBC remain quite. It’s obvious the ULM poster was correct

You go and find them... you know, since you are obsessed with it.

(08-05-2022 02:24 PM)HPCAT Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 02:05 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  Amazing how much someone's perspective can change in less than a year...

CUSA's future upon the news of Marshall leaving...

(09-13-2021 11:10 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Guess the CUSA, WAC and ASUN will merger.

On what the future of the SBC could be with JMU, Marshall, and App St...

(09-13-2021 11:05 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Long term JMU would be a better addition than Southern Miss. If you get pass the FCS label and look long term JMU is a trend up school and program while USM is trending down. Marshall would be the only one of the four I would rank higher in long term potential. JMU, Marshall and App St would give SBC a dominate foothold in their area and a high degree of interest for G5 programs.

On how JSU felt about a possible Sun Belt invite should one come their way...

(09-30-2021 07:48 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  But with all of this said do not believe JSU is getting invited to any current FBS conference. Troy would block SBC and UAB would block CUSA if JSU was even brought up. JSU would accept an invite from any FBS conference IMO. Most likely would jerk their arm off taking it from them.

On the direction the Sun Belt is moving...

(10-09-2021 09:36 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Maybe but the SBC has been trending up in football performance just dont understanding adding a program who will hurt your progression. I guess if your wanting in MS they are the only choice.

On what CUSA should do to send a message to the Sun Belt and make them "battle like hell" in recruiting, something I wouldn't think CUSA would worry about if the SBC is so much worse...

(10-22-2021 11:28 PM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Not sure I would not go straight into SBC territory.
EKU
Kennesaw
McNeese
West FL
Jackson St
JSU
NC AT
Add these schools at the SBC would be having to battle like hell in recruiting. Probably not the most reasonable long term but it would send a message.

Well done Sir...Well done...

I usually don’t copy long posts, but this was worth it.

Alex, I will take "How many SBC posters can we get in one thread to same say the same shiite over and over?" For $100.

(08-05-2022 04:22 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Alex, I will take "How many SBC posters can we get in one thread to same say the same shiite over and over?" For $100.

Ehh technically just quoting a post… jeopardy must not be your thing.

(08-05-2022 04:30 PM)ODU2011 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 04:22 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Alex, I will take "How many SBC posters can we get in one thread to same say the same shiite over and over?" For $100.

Ehh technically just quoting a post… jeopardy must not be your thing.

It isn't. Too easy.

(08-05-2022 04:34 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 04:30 PM)ODU2011 Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 04:22 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Alex, I will take "How many SBC posters can we get in one thread to same say the same shiite over and over?" For $100.

Ehh technically just quoting a post… jeopardy must not be your thing.

It isn't. Too easy.

Time for you to get the most wins in Jeopardy history then: https://www.jeopardy.com/be-on-j/anytime-test



To be about as on topic as the rest of this thread: lol<insertschoolotherthanApphere>, they suck.

(08-05-2022 02:05 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  Amazing how much someone's perspective can change in less than a year...

CUSA's future upon the news of Marshall leaving...

(09-13-2021 11:10 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Guess the CUSA, WAC and ASUN will merger.

On what the future of the SBC could be with JMU, Marshall, and App St...

(09-13-2021 11:05 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Long term JMU would be a better addition than Southern Miss. If you get pass the FCS label and look long term JMU is a trend up school and program while USM is trending down. Marshall would be the only one of the four I would rank higher in long term potential. JMU, Marshall and App St would give SBC a dominate foothold in their area and a high degree of interest for G5 programs.

On how JSU felt about a possible Sun Belt invite should one come their way...

(09-30-2021 07:48 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  But with all of this said do not believe JSU is getting invited to any current FBS conference. Troy would block SBC and UAB would block CUSA if JSU was even brought up. JSU would accept an invite from any FBS conference IMO. Most likely would jerk their arm off taking it from them.

On the direction the Sun Belt is moving...

(10-09-2021 09:36 AM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Maybe but the SBC has been trending up in football performance just dont understanding adding a program who will hurt your progression. I guess if your wanting in MS they are the only choice.

On what CUSA should do to send a message to the Sun Belt and make them "battle like hell" in recruiting, something I wouldn't think CUSA would worry about if the SBC is so much worse...

(10-22-2021 11:28 PM)Gemofthehills Wrote:  Not sure I would not go straight into SBC territory.
EKU
Kennesaw
McNeese
West FL
Jackson St
JSU
NC AT
Add these schools at the SBC would be having to battle like hell in recruiting. Probably not the most reasonable long term but it would send a message.

LOL Hello 911? Yeah I think I just witnessed a murder.

I used to think I would never want to share a conference with Latech fans but damn, I would buy yall lunch or something to trade for these jsu guys. They are off their nut.