Cyniclone
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,307
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 815
I Root For: ODU
Location:
|
RE: Howard to CAA in 23-24?
(06-20-2022 07:49 PM)solohawks Wrote: (06-20-2022 06:39 PM)TDenverFan Wrote: (06-20-2022 05:30 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote: (06-20-2022 03:48 PM)solohawks Wrote: (06-20-2022 03:26 PM)TDenverFan Wrote: Yeah, my stance on the CAA for a while has been that it doesn't really make a ton of sense, but any other options W&M has make even less sense for us. I think a lot of the CAA schools are in that boat.
If you were to ask each of the CAA members to draw up their (realistic) ideal conference, none would come up with the current CAA, but most would probably have 6-8 of the current CAA schools in it.
Bingo
Understanding the history of the CAA is crucial to understanding why things are the way they are. The pursuit of FCS football has led to the giant mismash that exists today. Instead of purposing a Richmond centric merger, the CAA and SoCon should have worked together to form a joint football league with the CAA and SoCon conferences serving as the conference shells for all other sports to allow for the maximization of geographic efficiency.
Ideal 2001 CAA
GMU, VCU, ODU, JMU, W&M, Davidson, UNCG, UNCW, Charleston
Ideal 2001 SoCon
UTC, ETSU, App St., WCU, GA Southern, Furman, Wofford, Citadel, VMI
Ideal 2001 SoCon-CAA Football
UTC, ETSU, App St., WCU, GA Southern, Furman, Wofford, Citadel, VMI, JMU, W&M, Richmond
Assuming you still see GMU, VCU, ODU, Davidson, App St, GA Southern, and later JMU leave for other leagues (and VMI and ETSU leave the SoCon but return), the SoCon should be fine with its our-timeline replacements (Elon, Samford, Mercer), but the CAA would presumably have had to expand to the north. And since some of their targets would likely have had FB, that joint SoCon-CAA league is going to get crowded. So I would imagine the CAA starts sponsoring FB eventually, most likely taking over for the A-10 as they did in reality. Come the late 2010s, both the SoCon and CAA end up looking very similar to how they actually did.
Yeah, the CAA was hurt a lot by schools moving "up" on the athletics ladder. I think most of the realignment moves the conference made were good, but the way the cards played out the league is basically guaranteed to be in a worse state now than it was ~10-15 years ago.
If the CAA had stayed a tight knit baskebtall centric league, would ODU have ever added football and would VCU and GMU have looked elsewhere.
The A10 was always a threat and if you're going to have a league from Boston to the Carolinas it might as well be the A10. Had the CAA stayed VA centric with a focus on basketball it would have stood a better chance at keeping VCU/ODU/GMU
The key to the CAA maintaining its core and competing with the A-10 is with Richmond. Had they stayed, and the CAA added Davidson and Charleston, you have a good Virginia/Carolinas conference that would have been built for the long haul. Richmond’s departure in large part led to the expansion that brought in Northeastern schools (and eventually Northeastern), and its cohesiveness diminished even as its basketball standing reached its apex. But Richmond wasn’t going to be the only CAA —> A10 defector
|
|