https://www.espn.com/college-football/st...team-field
Pac says they favor all 6 models. Everyone else opposes at least one.
"...The league's statement is the first to publicly detail the six models the commissioners have considered, including three variations of an eight-team format:
• Qualification for the best 12 teams;
• Automatic qualifications (AQs) for the six highest-ranked conference champions and six at-large bids, which was the original June proposal;
• AQs for the Power 5 conferences and one AQ for the highest-ranked Group of Five champion, along with six at-large bids ("5+1+6");
• Qualification for the best eight teams;
• AQs for the six highest-ranked conference champions and two at-large bids ("6+2");
• AQs for the Autonomy Five conferences and one AQ for the highest-ranked Group of Five champion, along with two at-large bids ("5+1+2").
"It is clear none of the six most-discussed expansion models has unanimous consent, with most having considerable opposition, and every conference other than the Pac-12 has indicated that they would be against at least one of the proposed models," the statement read. "If all 11 CFP members are unable to agree unanimously on a new format, then no expansion can occur in the current term, and our collective focus must turn to expansion immediately following the current term. The CFP has confirmed that we have another two years before we would need to come to agreement on an expanded format that could begin immediately after the current term ends....""