Pilot, what you don't seem to grasp is that it is not just ONE voice out there calling fabrics on this "vaccine." I just posted one video that I ran across. There are hundreds of doctors and PhD researchers trying to inform the public that this "vaccine" is not what it is being sold to the public as. Some of them have expertise in immunology, virology and other specialties that are related. Virtually all of them have been attacked, censored and marginalized by the the establishment.
The claim about the vax being 99% graphene oxide appears to have come from a group of Spanish researchers. Just so you know, I don't buy that assertion. But there are many who assert that graphene oxide IS in the vaccine. There are assertions that Pfizer didn't include graphene oxide in their ingredients due to it being a "trade secret." There are a ton of "fact checkers" out there working hard to tamp down what Big Pharma calls disinformation. If you wish to believe these Pharma companies which have paid
BILLIONS in fines for previous malfeasance and lying go ahead. I'm much more cynical and don't take their word for anything.
Your example debunking this doctor's credentials from a Forbes "science writer" is just another example of the MSM attacking an alternate voice. Funny but when you drill down on the credentials of all these various "fact checkers" you find that they all have links to globalists and the Pharma companies. Not surprised.
That this Forbes writer had to include something from
politifact, which is a real joke is a tell. He provided a link to a twitter thread that he believes bolsters his point. That tweet thread was from somebody who tries to debunk the assertion that 99% of the vaccine is graphene oxide. Several commenters were able to debunk the debunker and the original debunker's twitter account is suspended. (See twitter screenshot below) That's how credible this clown is. Read the Forbes bio of the science writer at the end of the article. He has been supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the NIH, CDC and Johns Hopkins. I don't trust any of those sources, due to their background and previous acts. The writer strikes me as just another Globalist pretending to be an expert. The sad part is that people believe him.
If this doctor in the video I posted is not an MD, gee, you got me there. I just posted this as one example of alternative voices. There are many, many more worldwide. You just don't want to hear them.
Regarding Dr. Ruby, she is not a scientist that developed drugs. She is a pharmaceutical drug development expert with over 20 years of experience in
regulatory processes for drug approval with the FDA and the EMA. Dr. Ruby worked on the human research studies to launch some of the most famous compounds in the world.
Notice that those who wish to shut down any discussion focus not on what these people say but primarily consist of attacks on their credentials, their character, etc. Same as it ever was. Alinsky 101. Attack the messengers, not the substance of their message. Or attribute something to them that they never said.