Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
Author Message
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,914
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #1
Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
Using the rules of the newly proposed expanded CFP. Any questions, please ask!

[Image: eL4Nim4.png]

Total number of bids by conference
65: SEC
49: Big Ten
48: Big 12
38: Pac-10/12
28: ACC
17: Big East/AAC (12 as AQ, 5 as G5)
10: MWC
7: I-A/FBS Ind (all ND), WAC
4: MAC
2: CUSA
1: Sun Belt
0: Big West

Total number of bids by school
17: Ohio St.
16: Oklahoma
12: Alabama, Florida
11: LSU
10: Florida St., Georgia, Oregon
9: USC
8: Boise St., Kansas St., Notre Dame, TCU, Wisconsin
7: Clemson, Penn St., Texas
6: Auburn, Miami-FL, Michigan, Stanford, Virginia Tech
5: Michigan St.
4: Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee, Washington
3: Arkansas, Baylor, Cincinnati, Missouri, Texas A&M, UCF, Utah
2: Arizona, Colorado, Louisville, South Carolina, West Virginia
1: Arizona St., California, CCU, Georgia Tech, Hawaii, Houston, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa St., Kansas, Marshall, Maryland, Memphis, Miami-OH, Mississippi St., NIU, North Carolina, Oklahoma St., Ole Miss, Oregon St., Texas Tech, Tulane, UCLA, Virginia, Washington St., WMU
(This post was last modified: 06-11-2021 02:10 PM by Nerdlinger.)
06-11-2021 02:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Fighting Muskie Offline
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 11,875
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 807
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
Post: #2
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 02:06 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  Using the rules of the newly proposed expanded CFP. Any questions, please ask!

[Image: eL4Nim4.png]

Total number of bids by conference
65: SEC
49: Big Ten
48: Big 12
38: Pac-10/12
28: ACC
17: Big East/AAC (12 as AQ, 5 as G5)
10: MWC
7: I-A/FBS Ind (all ND), WAC
4: MAC
2: CUSA
1: Sun Belt
0: Big West

Total number of bids by school
17: Ohio St.
16: Oklahoma
12: Alabama, Florida
11: LSU
10: Florida St., Georgia, Oregon
9: USC
8: Boise St., Kansas St., Notre Dame, TCU, Wisconsin
7: Clemson, Penn St., Texas
6: Auburn, Miami-FL, Michigan, Stanford, Virginia Tech
5: Michigan St.
4: Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee, Washington
3: Arkansas, Baylor, Cincinnati, Missouri, Texas A&M, UCF, Utah
2: Arizona, Colorado, Louisville, South Carolina, West Virginia
1: Arizona St., California, CCU, Georgia Tech, Hawaii, Houston, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa St., Kansas, Marshall, Maryland, Memphis, Miami-OH, Mississippi St., NIU, North Carolina, Oklahoma St., Ole Miss, Oregon St., Texas Tech, Tulane, UCLA, Virginia, Washington St., WMU

It seems we were working on the very same thing at the same time.
06-11-2021 02:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,914
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #3
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 02:12 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  It seems we were working on the very same thing at the same time.

So we were! I spent about 5 or 6 hours on this. How about you?
06-11-2021 02:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Offline
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 11,875
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 807
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
Post: #4
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 02:23 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  
(06-11-2021 02:12 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  It seems we were working on the very same thing at the same time.

So we were! I spent about 5 or 6 hours on this. How about you?

About 2, but I didn’t do the 7 CFP years because other folks already have.

My overall thoughts are that the 2011 and 2012 seasons were a total mess and it’s no wonder that’s when the BCS came to an end.

When you have teams ranked 10th and 12th getting first round byes something isn’t working right. (5 SEC teams in 2012 is wild!)

I was surprised to see how many non-BCS teams would have had Byes or At-Large berths too.
06-11-2021 02:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Offline
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 11,875
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 807
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
Post: #5
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
Also, 28 bids in 23 years is down right pathetic for the ACC.
06-11-2021 02:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Statefan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,511
Joined: May 2018
I Root For: .
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 02:33 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  Also, 28 bids in 23 years is down right pathetic for the ACC.

Is it?

With FSU at it's greatest in the first quarter of this time frame, and Miami, VT, BC, Pitt, and Syracuse in the Big East and Utah and TCU in the Mountain West what would you expect?
06-11-2021 02:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


dbackjon Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,066
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 667
I Root For: NAU/Illini
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 02:33 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  Also, 28 bids in 23 years is down right pathetic for the ACC.

I think it shows what we know: ACC has always been very top heavy - whether Florida State or Clemson being title contenders, and not a lot of depth below that
06-11-2021 02:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kit-Cat Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 125
I Root For: Championships
Location:

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #8
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
The 4th bye across 23 seasons listed:

#4 (7 times) 30.43%
#5 (4 times) 17.39%
#6 (7 times) 30.43%
#7 (2 times) 8.70%
#8 (1 times) 4.35%
#9 (0 times)
#10 (1 time) 4.35%
#11 (0 time)
#12 (1 time) 4.35%

Only 30.43% is that 4th bye filled by a conference champ ranked #4. Most of the time then it will be lower than #4 however 91.3% of the time it will be from a champ ranked #8 or higher.

2012 was the chaos year where ND finished #1, Florida was #3 but didn't win its conference, Oregon was #4 but didn't win its conference, a glut of SEC teams overall (4), two G5 champs making the field and no B1G representative. Very strange year and #12 Florida State is the 4th highest conference champ.

This proves then its possible in a chaos year to get a conference bye ranked as low as 12. More practically it opens the PAC champ up to getting a bye if they are cutoff from the top 5 or a bone crusher type G5 team like TCU was for the MWC in 2009.
06-11-2021 04:03 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,914
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #9
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 02:51 PM)Statefan Wrote:  
(06-11-2021 02:33 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  Also, 28 bids in 23 years is down right pathetic for the ACC.

Is it?

With FSU at it's greatest in the first quarter of this time frame, and Miami, VT, BC, Pitt, and Syracuse in the Big East and Utah and TCU in the Mountain West what would you expect?

Not pathetic per se, but the fewest of the surviving power conferences. Less than half of what the SEC accrued in this alternate timeline.
06-11-2021 10:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JamesTKirk Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 85
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation: 0
I Root For: the underdog
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 10:54 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  
(06-11-2021 02:51 PM)Statefan Wrote:  
(06-11-2021 02:33 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  Also, 28 bids in 23 years is down right pathetic for the ACC.

Is it?

With FSU at it's greatest in the first quarter of this time frame, and Miami, VT, BC, Pitt, and Syracuse in the Big East and Utah and TCU in the Mountain West what would you expect?

Not pathetic per se, but the fewest of the surviving power conferences. Less than half of what the SEC accrued in this alternate timeline.

Nerdlinger,

I am a fan! You are awesome.
06-12-2021 12:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
IHAVETRIED Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 561
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 43
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
Nerd, what a fantastic analysis and breakdown. Wow!
06-12-2021 02:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Jared7 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 436
Joined: Apr 2019
Reputation: 69
I Root For: TCU
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 02:06 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  Using the rules of the newly proposed expanded CFP. Any questions, please ask!

[Image: eL4Nim4.png]

Total number of bids by conference
65: SEC
49: Big Ten
48: Big 12
38: Pac-10/12
28: ACC
17: Big East/AAC (12 as AQ, 5 as G5)
10: MWC
7: I-A/FBS Ind (all ND), WAC
4: MAC
2: CUSA
1: Sun Belt
0: Big West

Total number of bids by school
17: Ohio St.
16: Oklahoma
12: Alabama, Florida
11: LSU
10: Florida St., Georgia, Oregon
9: USC
8: Boise St., Kansas St., Notre Dame, TCU, Wisconsin
7: Clemson, Penn St., Texas
6: Auburn, Miami-FL, Michigan, Stanford, Virginia Tech
5: Michigan St.
4: Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee, Washington
3: Arkansas, Baylor, Cincinnati, Missouri, Texas A&M, UCF, Utah
2: Arizona, Colorado, Louisville, South Carolina, West Virginia
1: Arizona St., California, CCU, Georgia Tech, Hawaii, Houston, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa St., Kansas, Marshall, Maryland, Memphis, Miami-OH, Mississippi St., NIU, North Carolina, Oklahoma St., Ole Miss, Oregon St., Texas Tech, Tulane, UCLA, Virginia, Washington St., WMU

Fantastic compilation!! Thanks!
06-12-2021 11:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
goofus Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,319
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 151
I Root For: Iowa
Location: chicago suburbs
Post: #13
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
Quick count. Not guarunteeing 100% accuracy

Number of bids based on current conference membership and not based on conference membership at the time.

SEC: 68
Big Ten: 54
Big 12: 45
PAC: 41
ACC: 34
ND: 8
AAC: 8
MWC: 9
MAC: 3
CUSA: 1
SBC: 1
06-12-2021 01:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crayton Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,338
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 187
I Root For: Florida
Location:
Post: #14
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
Great work, Nerdlinger.

BYEs aren't completely out of reach for the heretofore "Group of 5."

The Mountain West would have gotten 3 in a row (Utah '08, TCU '09 & '10)
The Big East/American got 2 since Miami in 2002 (Louisville '06, Cincy '09)

Realignment at the beginning of the last decade squashed most of that; all except for Cincy have moved into the heretofore "Power 5."
06-12-2021 02:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,914
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #15
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-12-2021 01:41 PM)goofus Wrote:  Quick count. Not guarunteeing 100% accuracy

Number of bids based on current conference membership and not based on conference membership at the time.

SEC: 68
Big Ten: 54
Big 12: 45
PAC: 41
ACC: 34
ND: 8
AAC: 8
MWC: 9
MAC: 3
CUSA: 1
SBC: 1

Close! Here's what I get:

SEC: 68
Big Ten: 54
Big 12: 48
Pac-12: 41
ACC: 34
AAC: 9
MWC: 9
I(ND): 8
MAC: 3
CUSA: 1
Sun Belt: 1
06-12-2021 02:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BCSvsBS Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 709
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation: 84
I Root For: USF
Location: In a moment in time.
Post: #16
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
Count is still wrong. You added all of Boises appearances even those when they were in a diferent conference. By that messure, you then have to count WVa, Louseville, Miami, Georgia Tech and Tulanes appearances for the AAC/Big East. This adds 4 more appearences as you already counted Tulane. Also subtract 4 from the ACC.
(This post was last modified: 06-12-2021 03:20 PM by BCSvsBS.)
06-12-2021 03:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


CoastalJuan Offline
Business Drunk
*

Posts: 6,914
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 517
I Root For: ECU
Location: Right near da beeach
Post: #17
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-11-2021 02:29 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  
(06-11-2021 02:23 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  
(06-11-2021 02:12 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  It seems we were working on the very same thing at the same time.

So we were! I spent about 5 or 6 hours on this. How about you?

About 2, but I didn’t do the 7 CFP years because other folks already have.

My overall thoughts are that the 2011 and 2012 seasons were a total mess and it’s no wonder that’s when the BCS came to an end.

When you have teams ranked 10th and 12th getting first round byes something isn’t working right. (5 SEC teams in 2012 is wild!)

I was surprised to see how many non-BCS teams would have had Byes or At-Large berths too.

And that's not even taking into consideration the rankings drop off right at the AQ/Non-AQ line.
06-12-2021 03:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,914
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #18
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-12-2021 03:14 PM)BCSvsBS Wrote:  Count is still wrong. You added all of Boises appearances even those when they were in a diferent conference. By that messure, you then have to count WVa, Louseville, Miami, Georgia Tech and Tulanes appearances for the AAC/Big East. This adds 4 more appearences as you already counted Tulane. Also subtract 4 from the ACC.

That was the point. Counts based on the conference at the time are in the OP.
06-12-2021 04:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BCSvsBS Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 709
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation: 84
I Root For: USF
Location: In a moment in time.
Post: #19
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-12-2021 04:00 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  
(06-12-2021 03:14 PM)BCSvsBS Wrote:  Count is still wrong. You added all of Boises appearances even those when they were in a diferent conference. By that messure, you then have to count WVa, Louseville, Miami, Georgia Tech and Tulanes appearances for the AAC/Big East. This adds 4 more appearences as you already counted Tulane. Also subtract 4 from the ACC.

That was the point. Counts based on the conference at the time are in the OP.

So the AAC shoild have 13 and the ACC should have 30.
06-12-2021 04:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JamesTKirk Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 85
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation: 0
I Root For: the underdog
Location:
Post: #20
RE: Retrospective 12-Team Playoffs
(06-12-2021 04:46 PM)BCSvsBS Wrote:  
(06-12-2021 04:00 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  [quote='BCSvsBS' pid='17464269' dateline='1623528879']
Count is still wrong. You added all of Boises appearances even those when they were in a diferent conference. By that messure, you then have to count WVa, Louseville, Miami, Georgia Tech and Tulanes appearances for the AAC/Big East. This adds 4 more appearences as you already counted Tulane. Also subtract 4 from the ACC.

That was the point. Counts based on the conference at the time are in the OP.

Nerdlinger,

Congratulations for doing an outstanding job on assembling the data. You did a yeoman's job!

It made the most sense to list the teams according to their conference affiliations at the time (including Boise St., which was in the WAC (2000-2010) and MWC (2011-2020)), rather than listing them according to the conferences that they are in today, because you were doing historical, rather than "alternative history" research.

Presenting the data the way that you did was very informative, because doing so made it clear that there was a lot more diversity in the number of conferences that would have been represented, had the 12-team CFP format been in place over the past 20 years.

Could the data be presented differently, based on a scenario in which the teams would have been in different conferences than they were in at the time?

The answer would be "yes, but that would have made it harder, not easier, for the reader to see what the impact of conference realignment has been."
(This post was last modified: 06-12-2021 06:43 PM by JamesTKirk.)
06-12-2021 06:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.