(05-13-2021 11:37 PM)Memphis Yankee Wrote: (05-13-2021 11:22 PM)pesik Wrote: (05-13-2021 11:04 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote: Why would the SEC commish care about anyone not in the SEC. He works for the SEC. He represents the SEC. He is accountable to the SEC schools. He's right. It has worked for the SEC. Extremely well. What else would you expect him to say, that it hasn't worked for the SEC? He doesn't represent the Sun Belt, Cusa, etc. He represents the SEC and obviously cares about whatever is best for the SEC.
That said, there is a big enough cry to push the playoff expansion through, regardless of what the SEC commish says. Right off the bat, you have the entire G5 Pac 12, and Big 12 that are for playoff expansion, that's 7 conferences right there. It's going to pass, and I believe it will go big (12-16 teams) rather than small (6-8). That's just my gut feeling.
there is podcast by the old sunbelt commish on how the playoff systems are decided in a different thread..
the voting is even equal amoung conference.. he noted the p5 amongs themselves vote on how the system will be.. and the g5 are basically bystanders watching ..
as far changing the system, acc/big 10/sec are the majority
Congress needs to get involved. Antitrust laws are being broken left and right.
this is incorrect anti-trust laws are not being broken at all
people simply do not understand what anti-trust is or how it works nor do they understand the bowl system and how the playoffs came to be
the major conferences owned the bowl games that were getting the big name teams (because each bowl had a tie in to a major conference) and they got together and decided to swap around teams to have a better match up
there is nothing at all "anti trust" about that........anti trust does not mean that suddenly those bowl games owe an opportunity to any D1-A team that feels they deserve to be in those bowls to actually be in those bowls
no one is stopping the other conferences from forming their own bowls and making their own match ups and using that to declare a champion....If there was something preventing that then it would be anti-trust
instead those other conferences were offered some concessions and a small amount of money if they wanted to participate provided certain criteria were met......and those conferences MADE A CHOICE to take that offer
people always want to compare the NFL or other pro leagues where "everyone gets a shot", but that means nothing in terms of anti-trust or why or why not any of those pro leagues do not need an exemption from congress in relation to "anti-trust"
those leagues can choose how to decide their playoff participants and championship rules as they see fit and the owners are free to have a vote on that
the ONLY thing that is "anti trust" about the NFL and other pro leagues is the draft system and the free agency system......but because all of the players in each league have chosen to have a union to bargain with the league those leagues and those leagues have chosen to accept those unions there is no need for a congressional anti-trust waiver to allow the draft and free agent rules
if those leagues decided they no longer wanted to deal with the union and then still have a draft and free agent restrictions then they would need that exemption
but other than that it has nothing to do with playoff formats or anything else.....because there is nothing preventing anyone else from trying to form other leagues to compete and nothing preventing them from trying to draw players to their league and have a union work with them
just like there is nothing stopping the G5 conferences from deciding they do not want to be a part of the BCS they will simply have their own bowls and invite who they wish based on their criteria.....but of course other conferences champions are going to say no because they are tied to their bowls and they like the BCS......but that is their right to do so