Cincinnati Bearcats

Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UC Statement on Brannen
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
UCGrad1992 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 31,859
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 2277
I Root For: Bearcats U
Location: North Carolina
Post: #821
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(04-09-2021 03:38 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  Thank the Lord! Let's move on and get the mag wheels back on the hoops program. I know this took longer than we wanted but it ended today. That's all that matters.

HEY JC! There's a coach down here in North Carolina that deserves an interview if you're reading this...

[Image: wes-miller-0090-1522246705.jpg?crop=1.00...size=900:*]

Not too shabby! 04-cheers
 
04-16-2021 03:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZCat Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,016
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation: 31
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #822
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(04-15-2021 01:21 PM)skylinecat Wrote:  
(04-14-2021 11:02 PM)ZCat Wrote:  Haven't had a chance to post in a while:

I still felt yr 1 players did not complain, and yr 2 they played HARD and won on the road post COVID with a depleted roster (against a below avg team I Know). I saw so much enthusiasm from MM and MS, etc on the bench, so I still feel like something is not adding up. Someone on another board said something interesting: that Coach JB ticked off some VIP, and the player defections/practices were used as an excuse to show him the door. This makes more sense.

I mean it may be that people wanted him gone, but it still doesn't change the fact that half his team transferred away despite you seeing enthusiasm on the bench. Unless you're saying that the VIP had something to do with them transferring.

Sorry for the confusion. No I’m not saying that some very important people were involved the transfers. It just seemed like the players were having so much fun and playing so hard on the court. Something still doesn’t add up. But you’re right- a bunch of people did transfer out. Even MS Who knew coaches in seventh grade.

My point was I read some VIP (plural -I think) were ticked off by coach and they used the player defections as an excuse to get rid of him. Who knows? Will be interesting to find out one day but seems like we have a better coach now so let’s go!
 
(This post was last modified: 04-16-2021 10:21 PM by ZCat.)
04-16-2021 10:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mptnstr@44 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,047
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 427
I Root For: Nati Bearcats
Location:
Post: #823
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(04-16-2021 03:36 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  
(04-09-2021 03:38 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  Thank the Lord! Let's move on and get the mag wheels back on the hoops program. I know this took longer than we wanted but it ended today. That's all that matters.

HEY JC! There's a coach down here in North Carolina that deserves an interview if you're reading this...

[Image: wes-miller-0090-1522246705.jpg?crop=1.00...size=900:*]

Not too shabby! 04-cheers

At least in that pic he does resemble David Pollock.
 
04-17-2021 08:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
robertfoshizzle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,981
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 273
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location: Columbus
Post: #824
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
 
04-19-2021 05:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatdp Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,283
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 66
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #825
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(04-19-2021 05:28 PM)robertfoshizzle Wrote:  

...so they're still saying nothing.
 
04-20-2021 08:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
the_dude Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 120
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 9
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #826
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(04-19-2021 05:28 PM)robertfoshizzle Wrote:  

I agree completely
 
04-20-2021 08:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
robertfoshizzle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,981
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 273
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location: Columbus
Post: #827
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
 
(This post was last modified: 05-03-2021 04:26 PM by robertfoshizzle.)
05-03-2021 04:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmark Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,837
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 806
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #828
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
Also sounds like Cunningham quietly began taking action prior to the season as this was getting to his desk including a letter of reprimand.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. If Brannen doesn't settle soon were all but certain to get more from both sides as freedom of information requests get results and litigation gets moving.
 
(This post was last modified: 05-03-2021 06:11 PM by bearcatmark.)
05-03-2021 05:58 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,325
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2163
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #829
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 04:25 PM)robertfoshizzle Wrote:  

https://amp.cincinnati.com/amp/492712700...ssion=true

Now that is how you say “no soup for you” in a letter.
 
05-03-2021 06:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCGrad1992 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 31,859
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 2277
I Root For: Bearcats U
Location: North Carolina
Post: #830
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
He ain't going to sniff $5M in a settlement. Again, John Cunningham did his homework. JB was reprimanded and did not improve upon the situation including an allegation of improper benefits to a player. There is a clear written record [paper trail] of the violations. See ya...wouldn't want to be ya.
 
05-03-2021 06:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 21,909
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1175
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
Post: #831
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 05:58 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Also sounds like Cunningham quietly began taking action prior to the season as this was getting to his desk including a letter of reprimand.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. If Brannen doesn't settle soon were all but certain to get more from both sides as freedom of information requests get results and litigation gets moving.

UC does not have the reputation as one to play hard-ball on these civil matters. In fact the reputation is the opposite. JB should have taken the money- once the written discovery starts flying and depositions get taken, his dirty laundry will be aired.

I get he is fighting for the $5M he believes he is owed, even if he wins the battle he may ultimately lose the war. He probably won’t be hirable for several years until all is forgotten.
 
05-03-2021 06:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmark Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,837
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 806
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #832
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
If he wants to be a head coach again a quick settlement would be so much better for him.
 
05-03-2021 06:41 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eroc Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,016
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 117
I Root For: UC, Liverpool
Location: The District
Post: #833
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 06:36 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 05:58 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Also sounds like Cunningham quietly began taking action prior to the season as this was getting to his desk including a letter of reprimand.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. If Brannen doesn't settle soon were all but certain to get more from both sides as freedom of information requests get results and litigation gets moving.

UC does not have the reputation as one to play hard-ball on these civil matters. In fact the reputation is the opposite. JB should have taken the money- once the written discovery starts flying and depositions get taken, his dirty laundry will be aired.

I get he is fighting for the $5M he believes he is owed, even if he wins the battle he may ultimately lose the war. He probably won’t be hirable for several years until all is forgotten.

Would he have been employable as an HC if he had taken the money? Strictly my opinion, but the time table for him is roughly the same whether he settled quietly or went to the mat with Cincy. As much as everybody wants this to go away, he's doing the right thing for his interests.
 
05-03-2021 06:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eroc Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,016
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 117
I Root For: UC, Liverpool
Location: The District
Post: #834
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 04:25 PM)robertfoshizzle Wrote:  

https://amp.cincinnati.com/amp/492712700...ssion=true

So this letter contains language that indicates that Coach Brannen committed an NCAA violation. How does that affect UC. This is obviously not Show Cause level otherwise this matter would have been settled already. How does this affect Cincy since UC is basically admitting, in writing, that violations occurred?
 
(This post was last modified: 05-03-2021 06:56 PM by eroc.)
05-03-2021 06:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 21,909
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1175
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
Post: #835
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 06:53 PM)eroc Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 06:36 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 05:58 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Also sounds like Cunningham quietly began taking action prior to the season as this was getting to his desk including a letter of reprimand.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. If Brannen doesn't settle soon were all but certain to get more from both sides as freedom of information requests get results and litigation gets moving.

UC does not have the reputation as one to play hard-ball on these civil matters. In fact the reputation is the opposite. JB should have taken the money- once the written discovery starts flying and depositions get taken, his dirty laundry will be aired.

I get he is fighting for the $5M he believes he is owed, even if he wins the battle he may ultimately lose the war. He probably won’t be hirable for several years until all is forgotten.

Would he have been employable as an HC if he had taken the money? Strictly my opinion, but the time table for him is roughly the same whether he settled quietly or went to the mat with Cincy. As much as everybody wants this to go away, he's doing the right thing for his interests.

Yes. The difference being the longer this draws out, the more dirty laundry will be aired out about him. If he had taken the money several weeks ago, there would have been confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses agreed to. People who have just assumed the coach parted ways and would not have read anything further into it.
 
05-03-2021 07:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hemond Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 343
Joined: May 2020
Reputation: -10
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #836
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
I'm glad Brannen is no longer coaching the Bearcats.
 
05-03-2021 07:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
levydl Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,422
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 138
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #837
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 07:02 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 06:53 PM)eroc Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 06:36 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 05:58 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Also sounds like Cunningham quietly began taking action prior to the season as this was getting to his desk including a letter of reprimand.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. If Brannen doesn't settle soon were all but certain to get more from both sides as freedom of information requests get results and litigation gets moving.

UC does not have the reputation as one to play hard-ball on these civil matters. In fact the reputation is the opposite. JB should have taken the money- once the written discovery starts flying and depositions get taken, his dirty laundry will be aired.

I get he is fighting for the $5M he believes he is owed, even if he wins the battle he may ultimately lose the war. He probably won’t be hirable for several years until all is forgotten.

Would he have been employable as an HC if he had taken the money? Strictly my opinion, but the time table for him is roughly the same whether he settled quietly or went to the mat with Cincy. As much as everybody wants this to go away, he's doing the right thing for his interests.

Yes. The difference being the longer this draws out, the more dirty laundry will be aired out about him. If he had taken the money several weeks ago, there would have been confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses agreed to. People who have just assumed the coach parted ways and would not have read anything further into it.

I tend to agree with eroc here. I don't think people hiring head coaches would have just shrugged about Brannen's leaving after year 2 when his players mutinied. He's probably better off fighting at this point.
 
05-03-2021 07:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eroc Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,016
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 117
I Root For: UC, Liverpool
Location: The District
Post: #838
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 07:02 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 06:53 PM)eroc Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 06:36 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 05:58 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Also sounds like Cunningham quietly began taking action prior to the season as this was getting to his desk including a letter of reprimand.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. If Brannen doesn't settle soon were all but certain to get more from both sides as freedom of information requests get results and litigation gets moving.

UC does not have the reputation as one to play hard-ball on these civil matters. In fact the reputation is the opposite. JB should have taken the money- once the written discovery starts flying and depositions get taken, his dirty laundry will be aired.

I get he is fighting for the $5M he believes he is owed, even if he wins the battle he may ultimately lose the war. He probably won’t be hirable for several years until all is forgotten.

Would he have been employable as an HC if he had taken the money? Strictly my opinion, but the time table for him is roughly the same whether he settled quietly or went to the mat with Cincy. As much as everybody wants this to go away, he's doing the right thing for his interests.

Yes. The difference being the longer this draws out, the more dirty laundry will be aired out about him. If he had taken the money several weeks ago, there would have been confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses agreed to. People who have just assumed the coach parted ways and would not have read anything further into it.

Perhaps i'm being naive but the reality is that regardless, Cincy would likely have to stay quiet related to John Brannen if future employers came calling for fear of additional litigation. They would have likely disclosed what we all already know about him but nothing more.

i apologize if i'm misreading your post, but it seems that you are assuming that if/when items come out, they will only hurt Coach Brannen. Undoubtedly it won't help him, but is it also possible that items may come out that would hurt Cincy? is it not at all curious that the investigation, at least to my knowledge, is still not closed?
 
05-03-2021 07:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmark Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,837
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 806
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #839
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 07:26 PM)levydl Wrote:  I tend to agree with eroc here. I don't think people hiring head coaches would have just shrugged about Brannen's leaving after year 2 when his players mutinied. He's probably better off fighting at this point.

There are a lot of short memories when it comes to coaches and whatever issues they had. He's still two years removed from a great stint at nku. People might not have hired him this year but if he let this thing go quietly he'd be in line for another opportunity somewhere to work his way back up. He may put that risk the more public things get.
 
(This post was last modified: 05-03-2021 07:36 PM by bearcatmark.)
05-03-2021 07:36 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 21,909
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1175
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
Post: #840
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(05-03-2021 07:33 PM)eroc Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 07:02 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 06:53 PM)eroc Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 06:36 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(05-03-2021 05:58 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Also sounds like Cunningham quietly began taking action prior to the season as this was getting to his desk including a letter of reprimand.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. If Brannen doesn't settle soon were all but certain to get more from both sides as freedom of information requests get results and litigation gets moving.

UC does not have the reputation as one to play hard-ball on these civil matters. In fact the reputation is the opposite. JB should have taken the money- once the written discovery starts flying and depositions get taken, his dirty laundry will be aired.

I get he is fighting for the $5M he believes he is owed, even if he wins the battle he may ultimately lose the war. He probably won’t be hirable for several years until all is forgotten.

Would he have been employable as an HC if he had taken the money? Strictly my opinion, but the time table for him is roughly the same whether he settled quietly or went to the mat with Cincy. As much as everybody wants this to go away, he's doing the right thing for his interests.

Yes. The difference being the longer this draws out, the more dirty laundry will be aired out about him. If he had taken the money several weeks ago, there would have been confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses agreed to. People who have just assumed the coach parted ways and would not have read anything further into it.

Perhaps i'm being naive but the reality is that regardless, Cincy would likely have to stay quiet related to John Brannen if future employers came calling for fear of additional litigation. They would have likely disclosed what we all already know about him but nothing more.

i apologize if i'm misreading your post, but it seems that you are assuming that if/when items come out, they will only hurt Coach Brannen. Undoubtedly it won't help him, but is it also possible that items may come out that would hurt Cincy? is it not at all curious that the investigation, at least to my knowledge, is still not closed?

A lawsuit is going to be filed eventually. Unless put under seal, the media will get their hands on the discovery one way or the other.

If the case goes to trial everything will definitely become fair game. JB has more at risk here. If UC is wrong then big deal, they pay money but they will still be UC.* If JB is wrong he could jeopardize his entire future.

* Regarding the money, people have assumed the money to pay for a defense and a settlement will come from UC's athletic budget. They pay premiums for insurance coverage for this sort of stuff. They may have a deductible or are self-insured up to a certain amount, but the balance will come from an Employment Practice Liability policy.
 
05-03-2021 07:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.