Quote:Two hundred companies signed off on a letter last week to condemn the new Georgia election bill, which notably requires identification for voter absentee ballots. Among the signees was the founder and CEO of food-delivery service Instacart, Apoorva Mehta.
“We believe every American should have a voice in our democracy and that voting should be safe and accessible to all voters,” the statement said. “There are hundreds of bills threatening to make voting more difficult in dozens of states nationwide. We call on elected leaders in every state capitol and in Congress to work across the aisle and ensure that every eligible American has the freedom to easily cast their ballot and participate fully in our democracy.”
While Instacart joined the group of virtue-signaling executives, the company neglects that it mandates all shoppers who deliver groceries to demonstrate photo and facial identification to participate in the gig economy.
According to the company’s website, “the first thing you’ll need to have on-hand” to become an Instacart shopper is “the details of your driver’s license.” Furthermore, applicants must provide their social security number information to get to the next step of inputting their bank information. Additionally, a shopper must undergo a background check that will take up to 10 business days to be cleared to be a contractor. Even after providing this information, a shopper must center their face on the application and be confirmed to shop on a daily or weekly basis.
Nevertheless, Instacart has seemingly taken issue with a bill that both mandates voter ID for absentee ballots and institutes an 11-day deadline for requesting an absentee before election day. Instacart has placed itself on the side that prefers an “election season,” which Democrats have sought.
The hypocrisy here is only worsened by the fact that the company wishes to make shoppers wait up to 10 days to begin working, while implying in its condemnation of the bill that 11 days is far too short for a contractor to have to request an absentee ballot. Why should there be any window, any background check, or any mandate for its employees to prove ID if Instacart takes issue with a bill to do exactly what it is doing (for something far less consequential)?
In truth, one should need to demonstrate ID to both work at Instacart and vote in an election, but these companies are too beholden to left-wing activists, and thus have lost any shred of credibility to comment on the issues of the day.
Instacart did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Federalist.
Quote:Two hundred companies signed off on a letter last week to condemn the new Georgia election bill, which notably requires identification for voter absentee ballots. Among the signees was the founder and CEO of food-delivery service Instacart, Apoorva Mehta.
“We believe every American should have a voice in our democracy and that voting should be safe and accessible to all voters,” the statement said. “There are hundreds of bills threatening to make voting more difficult in dozens of states nationwide. We call on elected leaders in every state capitol and in Congress to work across the aisle and ensure that every eligible American has the freedom to easily cast their ballot and participate fully in our democracy.”
While Instacart joined the group of virtue-signaling executives, the company neglects that it mandates all shoppers who deliver groceries to demonstrate photo and facial identification to participate in the gig economy.
According to the company’s website, “the first thing you’ll need to have on-hand” to become an Instacart shopper is “the details of your driver’s license.” Furthermore, applicants must provide their social security number information to get to the next step of inputting their bank information. Additionally, a shopper must undergo a background check that will take up to 10 business days to be cleared to be a contractor. Even after providing this information, a shopper must center their face on the application and be confirmed to shop on a daily or weekly basis.
Nevertheless, Instacart has seemingly taken issue with a bill that both mandates voter ID for absentee ballots and institutes an 11-day deadline for requesting an absentee before election day. Instacart has placed itself on the side that prefers an “election season,” which Democrats have sought.
The hypocrisy here is only worsened by the fact that the company wishes to make shoppers wait up to 10 days to begin working, while implying in its condemnation of the bill that 11 days is far too short for a contractor to have to request an absentee ballot. Why should there be any window, any background check, or any mandate for its employees to prove ID if Instacart takes issue with a bill to do exactly what it is doing (for something far less consequential)?
In truth, one should need to demonstrate ID to both work at Instacart and vote in an election, but these companies are too beholden to left-wing activists, and thus have lost any shred of credibility to comment on the issues of the day.
Instacart did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Federalist.
So, Instacart supports voter fraud and thinks blacks are mentally incapable of obtaining an identification card.
Or,,,,maybe Instacart supports free and fair elections and thinks that some
whites are mentally incapable of realizing that there was no voter fraud and that they've been lied to.
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
And you know this how, apart from pulling things out of your @ss? And if there is no risk of voter fraud then there is no problem verifying mail in votes, so what's the problem? Don't parrot the biased news media or Pedo Joe's lines that minorities are too incompetent to get IDs, we all know damn good and well that this is a BS argument.
I'm not close to gay........but it's gotten to this point with these pussified faggoos....
somebody wrote a song about it....gts knows who rogan loves....
It took so long to remember just what happened
I was so young and vestal then
You know it hurt me
But I'm breathing so I guess I'm still alive
Even if signs seem to tell me otherwise
I've got my hands bound
My head down, my eyes closed
And my throat wide open
Do unto others what has been done to me
Do unto others what has been done to you
I'm treading water
I need to sleep a while
My lamb and martyr, you look so precious
Won't you come a bit closer
Close enough so I can smell you
I need you to feel this
I can't stand to burn too long
Released in this sodomy
For one sweet moment I am whole
Do unto you now
What has been done to me
Do unto you now
What has been done
You're breathing so I guess you're still alive
Even if signs seem to tell me otherwise
Won't you come just a bit closer
Close enough so I can smell you
I need you to feel this
I need this to make me whole
There's release in this sodomy
For I am your witness that
Blood and flesh can be trusted
I am your witness that
Blood and flesh can be trusted
And only this one holy medium brings me piece of mind
Got your hands bound, your head down
And your eyes closed
You look so precious now
I have found some kind of temporary sanity in this
**** blood and *** on my hands
I've come round full circle
My lamb and martyr, this will be over soon
You look so precious
You look so precious
You look so precious
You look so precious
You look so precious
You look so precious
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
And you know this how, apart from pulling things out of your @ss? And if there is no risk of voter fraud then there is no problem verifying mail in votes, so what's the problem? Don't parrot the biased news media or Pedo Joe's lines that minorities are too incompetent to get IDs, we all know damn good and well that this is a BS argument.
It was challenged over and over but nothing came of it.
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
And you know this how, apart from pulling things out of your @ss? And if there is no risk of voter fraud then there is no problem verifying mail in votes, so what's the problem? Don't parrot the biased news media or Pedo Joe's lines that minorities are too incompetent to get IDs, we all know damn good and well that this is a BS argument.
It was challenged over and over but nothing came of it.
Sure thing. And the totally unbiased judges actually listened to evidence instead of just shooting things down with no justification.
And newsflash for you, though the law should be blind, judges are very much biased in many cases and put their politics first and foremost. Hence why you clowns get chubbies just dreaming of packing the SC.
(04-07-2021 08:05 PM)banker Wrote: Or so people are mentally ill enough to believe that 159,000,000 people legitimately voted in the 2020 Presidential election.
when you have 158.99999999 mm eligible, isn't that 'expectable +full + fair participation'?!
I'm myopic....the fact 2020 is the year of CFs is fitting....
at least muh recently subsidized and freshly printed 1400.00 covered my losses for muh 1440.00 loss betting on #henceDJT....
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2021 09:09 PM by stinkfist.)
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
And you know this how, apart from pulling things out of your @ss? And if there is no risk of voter fraud then there is no problem verifying mail in votes, so what's the problem? Don't parrot the biased news media or Pedo Joe's lines that minorities are too incompetent to get IDs, we all know damn good and well that this is a BS argument.
It was challenged over and over but nothing came of it.
Sure thing. And the totally unbiased judges actually listened to evidence instead of just shooting things down with no justification.
And newsflash for you, though the law should be blind, judges are very much biased in many cases and put their politics first and foremost. Hence why you clowns get chubbies just dreaming of packing the SC.
dog.....if you don't have a judge in the pocket, you're losing....
So I’m beginning to change my mind. Maybe blacks are stupid, inferior, lazy, incapable of simple task and in need of us white folks hand. That is what we are being told by all of the whitest people is it not?
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
Okay.
InstaCart is in a better position than (say) MLB because some people absolutely need to have their groceries delivered to them, no matter what the political views of the business making the delivery. Whereas, going to see an MLB game is a purely recreational activity (and an expensive one, too) that people don’t need in their life.
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2021 10:23 PM by Native Georgian.)
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
And you aren't a lily white pasty soy boy either. You probably wear a man bun, huh?
I took you off ignore because I got tired of seeing people quote your dumb ass and so I could respond to drivel like what you just posted. Not one of my better moves apparently. But hey, at least you never disappoint.
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
And you know this how, apart from pulling things out of your @ss? And if there is no risk of voter fraud then there is no problem verifying mail in votes, so what's the problem? Don't parrot the biased news media or Pedo Joe's lines that minorities are too incompetent to get IDs, we all know damn good and well that this is a BS argument.
It was challenged over and over but nothing came of it.
Sure thing. And the totally unbiased judges actually listened to evidence instead of just shooting things down with no justification.
And newsflash for you, though the law should be blind, judges are very much biased in many cases and put their politics first and foremost. Hence why you clowns get chubbies just dreaming of packing the SC.
Yes, Trump appointed judges. Stop perpetuating lies.
(This post was last modified: 04-08-2021 08:05 AM by swagsurfer11.)
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
And you know this how, apart from pulling things out of your @ss? And if there is no risk of voter fraud then there is no problem verifying mail in votes, so what's the problem? Don't parrot the biased news media or Pedo Joe's lines that minorities are too incompetent to get IDs, we all know damn good and well that this is a BS argument.
It was challenged over and over but nothing came of it.
Sure thing. And the totally unbiased judges actually listened to evidence instead of just shooting things down with no justification.
And newsflash for you, though the law should be blind, judges are very much biased in many cases and put their politics first and foremost. Hence why you clowns get chubbies just dreaming of packing the SC.
Yes, Trump appointed judges. Stop perpetuating lies.
I'll say the same to you as I do every other girl that wants to compete in men's sports. Put up or shut up. Where's your proof that it's predominantly Trump appointed judges who show the most bias, not one of Odumbo's holdovers? What about that decrepit fossil RBG that you guys worshipped and was so bitter she cost Dems a nominee on the SC? What about the entire 9th Circus?
(04-07-2021 07:02 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: There was no voter fraud.
And you aren't a lily white pasty soy boy either. You probably wear a man bun, huh?
I took you off ignore because I got tired of seeing people quote your dumb ass and so I could respond to drivel like what you just posted. Not one of my better moves apparently. But hey, at least you never disappoint.
Tiger, it's not a man bun. It's called a b!tch biscuit, you need to update your terminology to be more accurate. Calling it a man bun insinuates that the wearer is actually a man and not a little b!tch.
/
[NEWS] ‘Instacart’ Goes Woke, Will It Go Broke?
