Congratulations on the upset

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

(03-21-2021 05:40 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(03-21-2021 01:56 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  Should’ve been a sweep.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Pretty sure yesterday is somehow your fault

Of course. My bad y’all. I should’ve pitched better.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

(03-21-2021 01:36 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  If you were a perennial Regional team, you’d take the sport seriously too. This conference used to be a strong one in baseball (including W&M), but that went by the wayside. It’s unfortunate, because at least when that was the case I could give a meaningful tip of the cap to the opponent. We can’t get out of the CAA fast enough.

2.7 runs per game entering the weekend was indeed both anemic and inferior. Strain had been basically your lone bright spot to date, and even the W&M fans in your board stated as much. There was nothing disrespectful about stating as much, and doing so on our board no less. You were clearly bothered by this accurate assessment despite your assertion that you’re “just messing”.

Perennial? I guess technically that’s true lately, but let’s keep it real. You get in because the caa is horrible and you guys manage to keep an above average team. Let’s not act like you are a top 25 program or anything.

(03-23-2021 12:14 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-21-2021 01:36 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  If you were a perennial Regional team, you’d take the sport seriously too. This conference used to be a strong one in baseball (including W&M), but that went by the wayside. It’s unfortunate, because at least when that was the case I could give a meaningful tip of the cap to the opponent. We can’t get out of the CAA fast enough.

2.7 runs per game entering the weekend was indeed both anemic and inferior. Strain had been basically your lone bright spot to date, and even the W&M fans in your board stated as much. There was nothing disrespectful about stating as much, and doing so on our board no less. You were clearly bothered by this accurate assessment despite your assertion that you’re “just messing”.

Perennial? I guess technically that’s true lately, but let’s keep it real. You get in because the caa is horrible and you guys manage to keep an above average team. Let’s not act like you are a top 25 program or anything.

https://www.ncaa.com/news/baseball/artic...aseballcom
Being ranked as a top 50 program when you are a program of our size, could certainly be presented the way 08 did. But, hey whatever makes ya feel better. If going to the regionals 50% of the time in the last 20 or so years isn't "perennial" what is?

(03-23-2021 12:47 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 12:14 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-21-2021 01:36 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  If you were a perennial Regional team, you’d take the sport seriously too. This conference used to be a strong one in baseball (including W&M), but that went by the wayside. It’s unfortunate, because at least when that was the case I could give a meaningful tip of the cap to the opponent. We can’t get out of the CAA fast enough.

2.7 runs per game entering the weekend was indeed both anemic and inferior. Strain had been basically your lone bright spot to date, and even the W&M fans in your board stated as much. There was nothing disrespectful about stating as much, and doing so on our board no less. You were clearly bothered by this accurate assessment despite your assertion that you’re “just messing”.

Perennial? I guess technically that’s true lately, but let’s keep it real. You get in because the caa is horrible and you guys manage to keep an above average team. Let’s not act like you are a top 25 program or anything.

https://www.ncaa.com/news/baseball/artic...aseballcom
Being ranked as a top 50 program when you are a program of our size, could certainly be presented the way 08 did. But, hey whatever makes ya feel better. If going to the regionals 50% of the time in the last 20 or so years isn't "perennial" what is?

You have a decent program but again, nowhere close to being a juggernaut. A lot of the regionals wet with average records or worse and only because the conference is so bad this, resulting mostly in 3-4 seeds. This is not a cut down just a reality check

(03-23-2021 01:56 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 12:47 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 12:14 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-21-2021 01:36 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  If you were a perennial Regional team, you’d take the sport seriously too. This conference used to be a strong one in baseball (including W&M), but that went by the wayside. It’s unfortunate, because at least when that was the case I could give a meaningful tip of the cap to the opponent. We can’t get out of the CAA fast enough.

2.7 runs per game entering the weekend was indeed both anemic and inferior. Strain had been basically your lone bright spot to date, and even the W&M fans in your board stated as much. There was nothing disrespectful about stating as much, and doing so on our board no less. You were clearly bothered by this accurate assessment despite your assertion that you’re “just messing”.

Perennial? I guess technically that’s true lately, but let’s keep it real. You get in because the caa is horrible and you guys manage to keep an above average team. Let’s not act like you are a top 25 program or anything.

https://www.ncaa.com/news/baseball/artic...aseballcom
Being ranked as a top 50 program when you are a program of our size, could certainly be presented the way 08 did. But, hey whatever makes ya feel better. If going to the regionals 50% of the time in the last 20 or so years isn't "perennial" what is?

You have a decent program but again, nowhere close to being a juggernaut. A lot of the regionals wet with average records or worse and only because the conference is so bad this, resulting mostly in 3-4 seeds. This is not a cut down just a reality check

If he used the word "juggernaut", you will have to point that out to me, missed that. Or maybe you can point out where he said we were a perennial 1, 2 regional seed. Missed that too.
He stated we were a perennial regional team, which I think 50% of the last 20 years justifies that statement.

(03-23-2021 02:04 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 01:56 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 12:47 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 12:14 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-21-2021 01:36 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  If you were a perennial Regional team, you’d take the sport seriously too. This conference used to be a strong one in baseball (including W&M), but that went by the wayside. It’s unfortunate, because at least when that was the case I could give a meaningful tip of the cap to the opponent. We can’t get out of the CAA fast enough.

2.7 runs per game entering the weekend was indeed both anemic and inferior. Strain had been basically your lone bright spot to date, and even the W&M fans in your board stated as much. There was nothing disrespectful about stating as much, and doing so on our board no less. You were clearly bothered by this accurate assessment despite your assertion that you’re “just messing”.

Perennial? I guess technically that’s true lately, but let’s keep it real. You get in because the caa is horrible and you guys manage to keep an above average team. Let’s not act like you are a top 25 program or anything.

https://www.ncaa.com/news/baseball/artic...aseballcom
Being ranked as a top 50 program when you are a program of our size, could certainly be presented the way 08 did. But, hey whatever makes ya feel better. If going to the regionals 50% of the time in the last 20 or so years isn't "perennial" what is?

You have a decent program but again, nowhere close to being a juggernaut. A lot of the regionals wet with average records or worse and only because the conference is so bad this, resulting mostly in 3-4 seeds. This is not a cut down just a reality check

If he used the word "juggernaut", you will have to point that out to me, missed that. Or maybe you can point out where he said we were a perennial 1, 2 regional seed. Missed that too.
He stated we were a perennial regional team, which I think 50% of the last 20 years justifies that statement.

No problem, we can disagree on that. Missing one every now and then is what I would call
Perennial.

Nation: We're a perennial Regional team, but losing a series hurts in the conference because the CAA is down.
Tiger: I guess your a perennial Regional team, but it's only because the CAA is bad.
Hoops: We're a top 50 program and we've been to a Regional every other year for the past 20 years.
Tiger: You're nowhere close o being a juggernaut.

Guy is having an imaginary argument, countering claims that were never made.

(03-23-2021 02:23 PM)bricksnivy Wrote:  Nation: We're a perennial Regional team, but losing a series hurts in the conference because the CAA is down.
Tiger: I guess your a perennial Regional team, but it's only because the CAA is bad.
Hoops: We're a top 50 program and we've been to a Regional every other year for the past 20 years.
Tiger: You're nowhere close o being a juggernaut.

Guy is having an imaginary argument, countering claims that were never made.

Reminds me of a song I once heard...

"Hey jealousy..."

(03-23-2021 02:23 PM)bricksnivy Wrote:  Nation: We're a perennial Regional team, but losing a series hurts in the conference because the CAA is down.
Tiger: I guess your a perennial Regional team, but it's only because the CAA is bad.
Hoops: We're a top 50 program and we've been to a Regional every other year for the past 20 years.
Tiger: You're nowhere close o being a juggernaut.

Guy is having an imaginary argument, countering claims that were never made.

LOL that's the way i read it too.

(03-23-2021 12:14 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-21-2021 01:36 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  If you were a perennial Regional team, you’d take the sport seriously too. This conference used to be a strong one in baseball (including W&M), but that went by the wayside. It’s unfortunate, because at least when that was the case I could give a meaningful tip of the cap to the opponent. We can’t get out of the CAA fast enough.

2.7 runs per game entering the weekend was indeed both anemic and inferior. Strain had been basically your lone bright spot to date, and even the W&M fans in your board stated as much. There was nothing disrespectful about stating as much, and doing so on our board no less. You were clearly bothered by this accurate assessment despite your assertion that you’re “just messing”.

Perennial? I guess technically that’s true lately, but let’s keep it real. You get in because the caa is horrible and you guys manage to keep an above average team. Let’s not act like you are a top 25 program or anything.

The majority of our Regional appearances have come on at-large bids. We've also been a 2 or 3 seed in nearly all of our Regional spots, rather than a 4. So this is an entirely false claim.

Top 25 program? Perhaps not. Top 40, yes. Otherwise explain all the 2-seeds the committee has given us over the last 2 decades. We've received several of those.

(03-23-2021 02:23 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 02:04 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 01:56 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 12:47 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(03-23-2021 12:14 PM)Tigerway29 Wrote:  Perennial? I guess technically that’s true lately, but let’s keep it real. You get in because the caa is horrible and you guys manage to keep an above average team. Let’s not act like you are a top 25 program or anything.

https://www.ncaa.com/news/baseball/artic...aseballcom
Being ranked as a top 50 program when you are a program of our size, could certainly be presented the way 08 did. But, hey whatever makes ya feel better. If going to the regionals 50% of the time in the last 20 or so years isn't "perennial" what is?

You have a decent program but again, nowhere close to being a juggernaut. A lot of the regionals wet with average records or worse and only because the conference is so bad this, resulting mostly in 3-4 seeds. This is not a cut down just a reality check

If he used the word "juggernaut", you will have to point that out to me, missed that. Or maybe you can point out where he said we were a perennial 1, 2 regional seed. Missed that too.
He stated we were a perennial regional team, which I think 50% of the last 20 years justifies that statement.

No problem, we can disagree on that. Missing one every now and then is what I would call
Perennial.

Assume Tigers is Towson? Is so, can we agree by your definition of perennial that Towson is a "perennial bottom dweller in Men's Baseball and hoops?"