RE: Would conference only games work well for the AAC?
I'll repost and edit a couple posts I made in the "Big10" thread when that seemed the place to talk conference only...
I hope that any AAC policy is STANDARDS based, rather than just a quick "conference only."
That is - here are our health and safety standards, testing protocols, isolation, return to participation criteria. All AAC fall sports will adhere to them so that we can have conference competition. If you have an out-of-conference opponent who can meet those standards, you can play that game, and then continue to meet those standards and play conference competitions. Hopefully that would be in conjunction with other conferences which haven't yet declared "conference only." If the SEC and ACC DON'T follow the Big10 lead, and we have good stringent standards on par with theirs, some AAC-ACC or AAC-SEC games could also be salvaged.
My Navy-centric part is that I have high confidence the Navy football team and the rest of the Brigade can remain above a safety standard. If in the next eight weeks Notre Dame can do the same, Navy and Notre Dame can play on ABC or ESPN on Labor Day weekend in NMCMS. With or without fans. Barring significant changes, I am confident that Army can do a good job of isolating as well, and it is important to Navy football and our other 33 sports to have that game on CBS, again with or without fans.
Personally, if Navy had that two-game season, I would trade off some or all of the rest of the season. Sorry.
Notre Dame at Navy already had the potential to be one of the top viewership games in the AAC inventory. It would be good to deliver that to Disney. I know that Army-Navy doesn't deliver concrete benefit (i.e. $) to the rest of the conference. But there is a benefit to the AAC logo being on hyped special uniforms in front of millions of viewers. In normal years, those millions of viewers will hear about how tough Navy's road through the American is - obviously less so if there hasn't been much or any AAC season to make that a valid talking point.
My main point is that the calendar sets up nicely for an (initially) clean game against Notre Dame, and then if everything heads south nationwide for a couple months, isolate the Brigade and the Corps until 12 December and still give the nation what it needs.
For a third game, yes I would personally choose Air Force. Again for the calendar setup and also relative assured safety as well as institutional importance. Yes, it's their gameday revenue, but still #3.
Same rationale, my choice for #4 is Houston where it is on the calendar, then Memphis #5.
For away games for conference fairness at SMU first, then at ECU, largely about preserving Army and AF. Then Tulsa, at Tulane, Temple, at USF.
I really don't get excited about a ten game round robin conference schedule, especially at risk of losing Army Navy. And why wouldn't the conference and Disney want Notre Dame at Navy in week one if both teams are starting with a clean slate.
I acknowledge that is Navy-centric and may not be popular with fellow AAC fans.
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2020 01:20 PM by slhNavy91.)
|