And ....there is always more to the story. Shocker

(05-09-2020 08:05 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 07:57 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 05:37 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Also, where is this cargo shorts, hammer, and boots sh*t coming from? Those look like long bball shorts to me.

Twitter search function. Type any combination of his name + boots, hammer, etc.

The thing about those always asking for “sources”, is that they do not report things inconvenient to the narrative. I haven’t looked yet, but I doubt CNN has wrote a story about the video of him walking (not jogging) up to and entering the home, then fleeing when caught.

My man lookin like a basic white girl out there in some Uggs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

(05-09-2020 08:23 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  

And add another layer to this apparent law school exam problem. Did the victim actually commit a felony (assuming the shooter saw this)? Even under modern burglary statutes, did the victim actually commit a physical breaking and entering? Walking through an open door or window doesn’t establish this element. And, did he do it with the intent to commit a felony therein? Does his looking around establish the intent to commit a felony? Probably not.

Fascinating

In my uneducated opinion, The charges will likely remain murder in some form.

Why was the video that would spark the outrage released first, only for the ones confirming their story to come out afterwards?

How are these guys supposed to get a fair trail now? I'm not a lawyer, but the way this is playing out seems screwy.

(05-09-2020 09:18 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  In my uneducated opinion, The charges will likely remain murder in some form.

If he hadn't tried to take the gun I would agree. Could go manslaughter or negligent homicide

(05-09-2020 09:18 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  In my uneducated opinion, The charges will likely remain murder in some form.

Then they should walk. What were they supposed to do once he went for their gun and began punching them in the head, allow him to have it and kill them?

https://www.georgiacriminallawyer.com/fa...prisonment

I gotta think the GBI/DA will push that the men were committing the felony of false imprisonment and thus are guilty of felony murder.

I would hope that despite the national attention this case has drawn, a voluntary manslaughter plea could be reached.

(05-09-2020 09:22 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Why was the video that would spark the outrage released first, only for the ones confirming their story to come out afterwards?

How are these guys supposed to get a fair trail now? I'm not a lawyer, but the way this is playing out seems screwy.

A presidential candidate and former vP has already convicted them. Fair trial. Not a chance.

(05-09-2020 09:23 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:18 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  In my uneducated opinion, The charges will likely remain murder in some form.

Then they should walk. What were they supposed to do once he went for their gun and began punching them in the head, allow him to have it and kill them?

I’ll ask again what I brought up earlier. Hypothetically, let’s say I pull a gun on you. Do you lose your right to self defense if you try and disarm me?

If they walk, stores and businesses better board up their buildings.

I’m on the fence about the case.

(05-09-2020 09:28 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  If they walk, stores and businesses better board up their buildings.

I’m on the fence about the case.

That's reasonable doubt brother

(05-07-2020 02:03 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  I have no idea what to think of this, but as a white man who could end up being the father of a half black child in the not too distant future stuff like this scares me.

You have nothing to be afraid of. Traffic accidents are a bigger concern than situations like this.

(05-09-2020 09:27 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:23 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:18 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  In my uneducated opinion, The charges will likely remain murder in some form.

Then they should walk. What were they supposed to do once he went for their gun and began punching them in the head, allow him to have it and kill them?

I’ll ask again what I brought up earlier. Hypothetically, let’s say I pull a gun on you. Do you lose your right to self defense if you try and disarm me?

Define "pull a gun on". Them merely having a gun doesn't give him the right to attack them. Show me where they brandished it against him. You can't, because it's not in the video.

If I have a gun and am not threatening you with it, and you attack me and attempt to disarm me, am I supposed to just allow you?

Im not going to say that if I began to get my behind kicked, that I wouldn’t pull the trigger if the gun was being reached for or pulled away. However, I don’t agree with them being out looking for him. Follow him at most, but this is law enforcements job.

We aren’t talking about a citizens arrest on your property, in your home, or out on the street taking down a purse snatcher.

(05-09-2020 09:40 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:27 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:23 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:18 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  In my uneducated opinion, The charges will likely remain murder in some form.

Then they should walk. What were they supposed to do once he went for their gun and began punching them in the head, allow him to have it and kill them?

I’ll ask again what I brought up earlier. Hypothetically, let’s say I pull a gun on you. Do you lose your right to self defense if you try and disarm me?

Define "pull a gun on". Them merely having a gun doesn't give him the right to attack them. Show me where they brandished it against him. You can't, because it's not in the video.

If I have a gun and am not threatening you with it, and you attack me and attempt to disarm me, am I supposed to just allow you?

Wtf? This narrative flip is mind boggling.

They stopped him. Blocked his travel. With guns out.

That isnt 2 guys just chillin minding their own business with guns in their belts. And not threatening? They impeded his path, 2 on 1, with weapons. Should he have expected cookies and balloons?!


This portrayal of Ahmaud as an attacker is revolting.

One could say it was a form of entrapment/intimidation.

(05-09-2020 09:46 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:40 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:27 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:23 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:18 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  In my uneducated opinion, The charges will likely remain murder in some form.

Then they should walk. What were they supposed to do once he went for their gun and began punching them in the head, allow him to have it and kill them?

I’ll ask again what I brought up earlier. Hypothetically, let’s say I pull a gun on you. Do you lose your right to self defense if you try and disarm me?

Define "pull a gun on". Them merely having a gun doesn't give him the right to attack them. Show me where they brandished it against him. You can't, because it's not in the video.

If I have a gun and am not threatening you with it, and you attack me and attempt to disarm me, am I supposed to just allow you?

Wtf? This narrative flip is mind boggling.

They stopped him. Blocked his travel. With guns out.

That isnt 2 guys just chillin minding their own business with guns in their belts. And not threatening? They impeded his path, 2 on 1, with weapons. Should he have expected cookies and balloons?!


This portrayal of Ahmaud as an attacker is revolting.

He literally was the attacker.

(05-09-2020 09:46 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:40 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:27 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:23 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-09-2020 09:18 PM)BlazinBham Wrote:  In my uneducated opinion, The charges will likely remain murder in some form.

Then they should walk. What were they supposed to do once he went for their gun and began punching them in the head, allow him to have it and kill them?

I’ll ask again what I brought up earlier. Hypothetically, let’s say I pull a gun on you. Do you lose your right to self defense if you try and disarm me?

Define "pull a gun on". Them merely having a gun doesn't give him the right to attack them. Show me where they brandished it against him. You can't, because it's not in the video.

If I have a gun and am not threatening you with it, and you attack me and attempt to disarm me, am I supposed to just allow you?

Wtf? This narrative flip is mind boggling.

They stopped him. Blocked his travel. With guns out.

That isnt 2 guys just chillin minding their own business with guns in their belts. And not threatening? They impeded his path, 2 on 1, with weapons. Should he have expected cookies and balloons?!


This portrayal of Ahmaud as an attacker is revolting.

He should have called the police.