(02-07-2020 12:47 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:25 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Awesome picture of Jarron's game winning And1.

Not a foul at all.

Just some UFC ****



Also shows how bad Jarron beat him to the rim that he had to use to use his leg to make up space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

(02-07-2020 12:25 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Awesome picture of Jarron's game winning And1.

Look at Marshall standing back there watching helplessly as Cumberland rips his guts out.

Feel free to fill in the cartoon balloon of what he is thinking at that moment "____________".

(02-07-2020 03:59 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 11:30 AM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 11:26 AM)Joprior23 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 11:03 AM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  in my opinion we have Zero teams solidly in.


Houston loses to WSU and they are a bubble team.


No one in this league did anything remotely great in the non conference

We would go from a 7 seed (as of this morning in Lunardi’s bracket) to a 10 or 11 seed? That’s extremely doubtful.

No, not with a Home loss to WSU. Now maybe with a Home loss to WSU combined with a loss to @USF or home vs Tulsa.

How would you feel about a home loss to WSU and a road loss to UConn? Not saying we'll definitely win, but it's a game we have a legitimate shot in imo.

I'm just curious how the committee would view us with all of our close losses. We are way better than our record indicates, as reflected in the most recent net rankings (we jumped from 92 to 69.) Normally, a loss to a team barely above .500 wouldn't look good, but we've played a lot of solid to good teams and barely lost so I don't think it would personally sink them.

That's a Q1 game .. so Houston is probably still good there.

Though Houston isn't losing to WSU at home. We can't shoot on the road at all.

Welp. We needed to win that UCF game. We haven't turned the corner yet. Better... but we're not there.

Let's just keep playing hard, get better during the off-season... get a couple new bodies on campus... and get back at it next year, with some experience under our belts.

(02-07-2020 04:02 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:47 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:25 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Awesome picture of Jarron's game winning And1.

Not a foul at all.

Just some UFC ****



Also shows how bad Jarron beat him to the rim that he had to use to use his leg to make up space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket...=401169566

You can't take a still capture AFTER initial contact and try to justify it.

Watch the video there. 18 second mark or so they show a down the lane view. The leg kick up is after Cumberland initiated contact into his waist. That's just physics. It's a no-call at worst. Offensive player initiated the contact by jumping into the defensive player. That's the type of call that only Cumberland gets.

My predictions for the rest of the year... and I think it is being maybe a tad overly-optimistic...

@ Tulane (WIN)
@ Tulsa (LOSS)
Cincinnati (LOSS)
@ Memphis (LOSS)
Temple (LOSS)
@ USF (WIN)
UCONN (LOSS)
@ UCF (LOSS)

That is assuming we can win on the road... which we haven't done.

(02-07-2020 04:40 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:02 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:47 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:25 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Awesome picture of Jarron's game winning And1.

Not a foul at all.

Just some UFC ****



Also shows how bad Jarron beat him to the rim that he had to use to use his leg to make up space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket...=401169566

You can't take a still capture AFTER initial contact and try to justify it.

Watch the video there. 18 second mark or so they show a down the lane view. The leg kick up is after Cumberland initiated contact into his waist. That's just physics. It's a no-call at worst. Offensive player initiated the contact by jumping into the defensive player. That's the type of call that only Cumberland gets.

Dude, he's ALL OVER him.

(02-07-2020 04:40 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:02 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:47 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:25 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Awesome picture of Jarron's game winning And1.

Not a foul at all.

Just some UFC ****



Also shows how bad Jarron beat him to the rim that he had to use to use his leg to make up space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket...=401169566

You can't take a still capture AFTER initial contact and try to justify it.

Watch the video there. 18 second mark or so they show a down the lane view. The leg kick up is after Cumberland initiated contact into his waist. That's just physics. It's a no-call at worst. Offensive player initiated the contact by jumping into the defensive player. That's the type of call that only Cumberland gets.

(02-07-2020 04:45 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:40 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:02 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:47 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:25 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Awesome picture of Jarron's game winning And1.

Not a foul at all.

Just some UFC ****



Also shows how bad Jarron beat him to the rim that he had to use to use his leg to make up space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket...=401169566

You can't take a still capture AFTER initial contact and try to justify it.

Watch the video there. 18 second mark or so they show a down the lane view. The leg kick up is after Cumberland initiated contact into his waist. That's just physics. It's a no-call at worst. Offensive player initiated the contact by jumping into the defensive player. That's the type of call that only Cumberland gets.

Dude, he's ALL OVER him.

He's in legal guarding position.

(02-07-2020 04:45 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:40 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:02 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:47 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:25 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Awesome picture of Jarron's game winning And1.

Not a foul at all.

Just some UFC ****



Also shows how bad Jarron beat him to the rim that he had to use to use his leg to make up space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket...=401169566

You can't take a still capture AFTER initial contact and try to justify it.

Watch the video there. 18 second mark or so they show a down the lane view. The leg kick up is after Cumberland initiated contact into his waist. That's just physics. It's a no-call at worst. Offensive player initiated the contact by jumping into the defensive player. That's the type of call that only Cumberland gets.

I know the call is pretty comical after you watch the video and see how horrible it was. Thanks for agreeing.

Sticking your leg out to cut a guy off that has you beat to the rim is LEGAL guarding position. Now I've heard everything. Stickboy you are the mvp of this thread. Just constant entertainment. I can't tell if you're a parody of a homer poster or not.

according to espn (updated today), cincinnati still not on the right side of the bubble but gives them the auto-bid-- only 2 atlarges

road to sweet 16 via espn:
cincy a 12 seed needing to beat kentucky and baylor to get to the s16
wichita a 9 seed needing to beat texas tech and gonzaga to make a s16
houston a 7 seed needing to beat indiana and duke
memphis is 1st out

a dream situation for all of aac would be getting that 8-9 seed in the sdsu bracket..who most are projecting a 1 seed

(02-07-2020 04:51 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Sticking your leg out to cut a guy off that has you beat to the rim is LEGAL guarding position. Now I've heard everything. Stickboy you are the mvp of this thread. Just constant entertainment. I can't tell if you're a parody of a homer poster or not.

Dude if you can't see that the leg comes out AFTER Cumberland drives INTO Dexter, I don't know what to tell you.

I get it, you think Cumberland can do no wrong and all the calls he gets are 100% correct. Every non-Cincy fan disagrees with you. It's ok, he's a great player. He's also babied by the refs. Both can be true. No other player gets that call last night.

(02-07-2020 04:46 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:45 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:40 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:02 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:47 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  Not a foul at all.

Just some UFC ****



Also shows how bad Jarron beat him to the rim that he had to use to use his leg to make up space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket...=401169566

You can't take a still capture AFTER initial contact and try to justify it.

Watch the video there. 18 second mark or so they show a down the lane view. The leg kick up is after Cumberland initiated contact into his waist. That's just physics. It's a no-call at worst. Offensive player initiated the contact by jumping into the defensive player. That's the type of call that only Cumberland gets.

Dude, he's ALL OVER him.

He's in legal guarding position.

Not if you gain an advantage through contact.

(02-07-2020 04:59 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:46 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:45 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:40 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:02 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket...=401169566

You can't take a still capture AFTER initial contact and try to justify it.

Watch the video there. 18 second mark or so they show a down the lane view. The leg kick up is after Cumberland initiated contact into his waist. That's just physics. It's a no-call at worst. Offensive player initiated the contact by jumping into the defensive player. That's the type of call that only Cumberland gets.

Dude, he's ALL OVER him.

He's in legal guarding position.

Not if you gain an advantage through contact.

You mean the advantage that CUMBERLAND gained through initiating contact. Yes you are correct, that was technically illegal for cumberland to do.

If Cumberland didn’t have his man beat off the dribble, then I would think the defender would be in better position (likely resulting in no call). Since he beat his man and there was contact with the defender not in great position, you leave it up to the ref.

Did he roundhouse kick Jarron like the screenshot would have you believe? No.

(02-07-2020 05:16 PM)cscottl1981 Wrote:  If Cumberland didn’t have his man beat off the dribble, then I would think the defender would be in better position (likely resulting in no call). Since he beat his man and there was contact with the defender not in great position, you leave it up to the ref.

Did he roundhouse kick Jarron like the screenshot would have you believe? No.

By the rules, i don't see it as a foul.

It DEFINITELY was not called the rest of the game like that. So calling it there and therefore deciding the game is just dumb. If you are gonna call it incorrectly, call it incorrectly all game.

(02-07-2020 05:19 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 05:16 PM)cscottl1981 Wrote:  If Cumberland didn’t have his man beat off the dribble, then I would think the defender would be in better position (likely resulting in no call). Since he beat his man and there was contact with the defender not in great position, you leave it up to the ref.

Did he roundhouse kick Jarron like the screenshot would have you believe? No.

By the rules, i don't see it as a foul.

It DEFINITELY was not called the rest of the game like that. So calling it there and therefore deciding the game is just dumb. If you are gonna call it incorrectly, call it incorrectly all game.

Hey Stickboy, why don't you have another look?

(02-07-2020 06:22 PM)UCbball21 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 05:19 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 05:16 PM)cscottl1981 Wrote:  If Cumberland didn’t have his man beat off the dribble, then I would think the defender would be in better position (likely resulting in no call). Since he beat his man and there was contact with the defender not in great position, you leave it up to the ref.

Did he roundhouse kick Jarron like the screenshot would have you believe? No.

By the rules, i don't see it as a foul.

It DEFINITELY was not called the rest of the game like that. So calling it there and therefore deciding the game is just dumb. If you are gonna call it incorrectly, call it incorrectly all game.

Hey Stickboy, why don't you have another look?

Cool.. same video.. same answer. Incorrect call

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

(02-07-2020 04:40 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 04:02 PM)Nameless Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:47 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  

(02-07-2020 12:25 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Awesome picture of Jarron's game winning And1.

Not a foul at all.

Just some UFC ****



Also shows how bad Jarron beat him to the rim that he had to use to use his leg to make up space


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That still shot really makes me wonder how some people were saying that wasn't a foul. Obviously things look different live, but they must have showed a replay, no?

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket...=401169566

You can't take a still capture AFTER initial contact and try to justify it.

Watch the video there. 18 second mark or so they show a down the lane view. The leg kick up is after Cumberland initiated contact into his waist. That's just physics. It's a no-call at worst. Offensive player initiated the contact by jumping into the defensive player. That's the type of call that only Cumberland gets.

Lolol yea this is totally legal guarding position from WSU

Textbook defense


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk