(08-19-2019 08:28 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 01:41 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(08-15-2019 03:52 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-15-2019 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So tell me, what proof do you actually need? Does he have to don a white hood and lynch someone? Where's the bar for you?

I don't know Tom, maybe it's actually doing something racist..

I mean Obama was definitely racist.. He chose to go to a black criminal's wedding but couldn't be bothered to go to a white officer's funeral or offer condolences to any of them. He would send low level aids..

He hung around with race baiters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson... So to me that's more racists than someone saying, hey he wasn't born here, he was born in his father's home country or he's guilty because of xyz, and was proven in a court of law... but I'm just an idiot right...

It's funny how racist Tom can read between the lines to call Trump a racist but he wants the words spelled out in the below topic. Not good enough that everyone but Tom can see that the church Obama belong to didnt want white people attending.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-880583-post-16...id16237558

Nope he wanted to see it with his own eyes "white people not welcome. Intent is not important to him. Words are not important to him. Actions are not important to him. But BluebloodedTom can see Trump is a racist by injecting what he thinks . Without any facts to back it up. Come on Tom, show us all the racist words from your president?

Thanks dishonest WKU. I never said his church didn't want white people attending. I clearly said they don't have a policy that says whites not allowed...and they don't.

Of course they didn't, but the anti-white rhetoric spewed from the pulpit would make sure that they didn't remain if they stumbled into the establishment.

So are we now determining racism by the published policy? If so, that would reduce the number of racists...bigly

Well, you all seem to want published policy to show trump a racist?

(08-19-2019 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:28 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 01:41 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(08-15-2019 03:52 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I don't know Tom, maybe it's actually doing something racist..

I mean Obama was definitely racist.. He chose to go to a black criminal's wedding but couldn't be bothered to go to a white officer's funeral or offer condolences to any of them. He would send low level aids..

He hung around with race baiters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson... So to me that's more racists than someone saying, hey he wasn't born here, he was born in his father's home country or he's guilty because of xyz, and was proven in a court of law... but I'm just an idiot right...

It's funny how racist Tom can read between the lines to call Trump a racist but he wants the words spelled out in the below topic. Not good enough that everyone but Tom can see that the church Obama belong to didnt want white people attending.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-880583-post-16...id16237558

Nope he wanted to see it with his own eyes "white people not welcome. Intent is not important to him. Words are not important to him. Actions are not important to him. But BluebloodedTom can see Trump is a racist by injecting what he thinks . Without any facts to back it up. Come on Tom, show us all the racist words from your president?

Thanks dishonest WKU. I never said his church didn't want white people attending. I clearly said they don't have a policy that says whites not allowed...and they don't.

Of course they didn't, but the anti-white rhetoric spewed from the pulpit would make sure that they didn't remain if they stumbled into the establishment.

So are we now determining racism by the published policy? If so, that would reduce the number of racists...bigly

Well, you all seem to want published policy to show trump a racist?

round and round

(08-16-2019 02:14 PM)bullet Wrote:  Ultimately, the Dems have nothing else. https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/...eapon-time

"...First, Trump really is a hardball negotiator. He understands that the most important word for a negotiator to say is “no” as many times as necessary, before getting to “yes.”

Second, Trump has nothing to prove. Even with failed businesses, he has been a successful business person, very wealthy, and now, if he fails to strike a deal or is voted out of office, he still has a lot to fall back on. Literally, none of his domestic political opponents are in that position. To a person, the Democratic candidates have few real political or private-sector accomplishments; they are known for nothing but getting elected and running for office. They have few or no real options if they’re voted out of office, and so are desperate to win.

To use a favorite contemporary progressive word, it is “existential” to the Democrats; it is not to Trump. It is little wonder that they all lurch to the most radical ideas and attacks (free health care, open borders, reparations, free tuition, dismantling America’s energy sector, labeling opponents racist, etc.). It is media attention or death. Democrats are playing political “Hunger Games.” Trump is playing golf...."

Exactly!
I’ll add that these hapless democrats also see the election to the office of POTUS is their only path to being fabulously wealthy. Trump already was, of course....

(08-19-2019 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:28 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 01:41 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(08-15-2019 03:52 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I don't know Tom, maybe it's actually doing something racist..

I mean Obama was definitely racist.. He chose to go to a black criminal's wedding but couldn't be bothered to go to a white officer's funeral or offer condolences to any of them. He would send low level aids..

He hung around with race baiters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson... So to me that's more racists than someone saying, hey he wasn't born here, he was born in his father's home country or he's guilty because of xyz, and was proven in a court of law... but I'm just an idiot right...

It's funny how racist Tom can read between the lines to call Trump a racist but he wants the words spelled out in the below topic. Not good enough that everyone but Tom can see that the church Obama belong to didnt want white people attending.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-880583-post-16...id16237558

Nope he wanted to see it with his own eyes "white people not welcome. Intent is not important to him. Words are not important to him. Actions are not important to him. But BluebloodedTom can see Trump is a racist by injecting what he thinks . Without any facts to back it up. Come on Tom, show us all the racist words from your president?

Thanks dishonest WKU. I never said his church didn't want white people attending. I clearly said they don't have a policy that says whites not allowed...and they don't.

Of course they didn't, but the anti-white rhetoric spewed from the pulpit would make sure that they didn't remain if they stumbled into the establishment.

So are we now determining racism by the published policy? If so, that would reduce the number of racists...bigly

Well, you all seem to want published policy to show trump a racist?

Of course he is a racist. Putin is. Trump just wants to let Putin know he is on his side. Everyone knows this.....

(08-19-2019 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:28 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 01:41 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(08-15-2019 03:52 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I don't know Tom, maybe it's actually doing something racist..

I mean Obama was definitely racist.. He chose to go to a black criminal's wedding but couldn't be bothered to go to a white officer's funeral or offer condolences to any of them. He would send low level aids..

He hung around with race baiters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson... So to me that's more racists than someone saying, hey he wasn't born here, he was born in his father's home country or he's guilty because of xyz, and was proven in a court of law... but I'm just an idiot right...

It's funny how racist Tom can read between the lines to call Trump a racist but he wants the words spelled out in the below topic. Not good enough that everyone but Tom can see that the church Obama belong to didnt want white people attending.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-880583-post-16...id16237558

Nope he wanted to see it with his own eyes "white people not welcome. Intent is not important to him. Words are not important to him. Actions are not important to him. But BluebloodedTom can see Trump is a racist by injecting what he thinks . Without any facts to back it up. Come on Tom, show us all the racist words from your president?

Thanks dishonest WKU. I never said his church didn't want white people attending. I clearly said they don't have a policy that says whites not allowed...and they don't.

Of course they didn't, but the anti-white rhetoric spewed from the pulpit would make sure that they didn't remain if they stumbled into the establishment.

So are we now determining racism by the published policy? If so, that would reduce the number of racists...bigly

Well, you all seem to want published policy to show trump a racist?

Tom I don't want a printed policy, but something is better than just saying, well he claimed Obama was born in Kenya or he claimed a black person on trial was guilty..

(08-19-2019 09:14 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:28 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 01:41 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  It's funny how racist Tom can read between the lines to call Trump a racist but he wants the words spelled out in the below topic. Not good enough that everyone but Tom can see that the church Obama belong to didnt want white people attending.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-880583-post-16...id16237558

Nope he wanted to see it with his own eyes "white people not welcome. Intent is not important to him. Words are not important to him. Actions are not important to him. But BluebloodedTom can see Trump is a racist by injecting what he thinks . Without any facts to back it up. Come on Tom, show us all the racist words from your president?

Thanks dishonest WKU. I never said his church didn't want white people attending. I clearly said they don't have a policy that says whites not allowed...and they don't.

Of course they didn't, but the anti-white rhetoric spewed from the pulpit would make sure that they didn't remain if they stumbled into the establishment.

So are we now determining racism by the published policy? If so, that would reduce the number of racists...bigly

Well, you all seem to want published policy to show trump a racist?

Tom I don't want a printed policy, but something is better than just saying, well he claimed Obama was born in Kenya or he claimed a black person on trial was guilty..

You seriously think that's it?

Not only did he imply he was born in Kenya, but he claimed he had people in Hawaii and that his BC was faked and on and on. Then you have him calling most black and brown foils of his stupid and ignorant, etc. And he didn't just claim the CP5 were guilty. He took out that full page ad and he still refuses to call them innocent even after DNA acquitted them! And then you have the whole invasion nonsense, and on and on.

Again, you're free to feel he's not a racist just as I'm free to feel he is.

(08-19-2019 11:21 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 09:14 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:28 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Thanks dishonest WKU. I never said his church didn't want white people attending. I clearly said they don't have a policy that says whites not allowed...and they don't.

Of course they didn't, but the anti-white rhetoric spewed from the pulpit would make sure that they didn't remain if they stumbled into the establishment.

So are we now determining racism by the published policy? If so, that would reduce the number of racists...bigly

Well, you all seem to want published policy to show trump a racist?

Tom I don't want a printed policy, but something is better than just saying, well he claimed Obama was born in Kenya or he claimed a black person on trial was guilty..

You seriously think that's it?

Not only did he imply he was born in Kenya, but he claimed he had people in Hawaii and that his BC was faked and on and on. Then you have him calling most black and brown foils of his stupid and ignorant, etc. And he didn't just claim the CP5 were guilty. He took out that full page ad and he still refuses to call them innocent even after DNA acquitted them! And then you have the whole invasion nonsense, and on and on.

Again, you're free to feel he's not a racist just as I'm free to feel he is.

Tom so because he went on and on doesn't mean it's racist.. If Obama had been white and he claimed he was born in Canada, would you feel the same way?

If the CP5 had been white and Obama had taken out the ad, would you considered it racist?

And what else do you call it when people come in from another country illegally and refuse to leave?

(08-19-2019 11:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 11:21 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 09:14 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:28 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  Of course they didn't, but the anti-white rhetoric spewed from the pulpit would make sure that they didn't remain if they stumbled into the establishment.

So are we now determining racism by the published policy? If so, that would reduce the number of racists...bigly

Well, you all seem to want published policy to show trump a racist?

Tom I don't want a printed policy, but something is better than just saying, well he claimed Obama was born in Kenya or he claimed a black person on trial was guilty..

You seriously think that's it?

Not only did he imply he was born in Kenya, but he claimed he had people in Hawaii and that his BC was faked and on and on. Then you have him calling most black and brown foils of his stupid and ignorant, etc. And he didn't just claim the CP5 were guilty. He took out that full page ad and he still refuses to call them innocent even after DNA acquitted them! And then you have the whole invasion nonsense, and on and on.

Again, you're free to feel he's not a racist just as I'm free to feel he is.

Tom so because he went on and on doesn't mean it's racist.. If Obama had been white and he claimed he was born in Canada, would you feel the same way?

If the CP5 had been white and Obama had taken out the ad, would you considered it racist?

And what else do you call it when people come in from another country illegally and refuse to leave?

People coming in for asylum aren't doing it illegally. Nor were/are kids who's parents brought them here as children.

(08-19-2019 11:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 11:24 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 11:21 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 09:14 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Well, you all seem to want published policy to show trump a racist?

Tom I don't want a printed policy, but something is better than just saying, well he claimed Obama was born in Kenya or he claimed a black person on trial was guilty..

You seriously think that's it?

Not only did he imply he was born in Kenya, but he claimed he had people in Hawaii and that his BC was faked and on and on. Then you have him calling most black and brown foils of his stupid and ignorant, etc. And he didn't just claim the CP5 were guilty. He took out that full page ad and he still refuses to call them innocent even after DNA acquitted them! And then you have the whole invasion nonsense, and on and on.

Again, you're free to feel he's not a racist just as I'm free to feel he is.

Tom so because he went on and on doesn't mean it's racist.. If Obama had been white and he claimed he was born in Canada, would you feel the same way?

If the CP5 had been white and Obama had taken out the ad, would you considered it racist?

And what else do you call it when people come in from another country illegally and refuse to leave?

People coming in for asylum aren't doing it illegally. Nor were/are kids who's parents brought them here as children.

Tom if they passed through 1 or 2 countries in route, then yes they did mean to illegally..

Tom I can't help what the parents did, but the parents knew what they were doing wasn't legal, it's like if you know your friend is in possession of an illegal substance but you get in the car with him and you get caught, you're just as guilty...