(02-18-2019 08:35 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  This thread is a joke, and the longer it stays active, the more of a circus you guys are running. There were coma rumors, a link to a Ruth Ginsberg death notice, and all sorts of cruel memes about a very sick woman who has given a lifetime of service on the court or in the classroom.

I said almost a month ago in this thread TMZ would break the real story and lo and behold they did. I also predicted she would show up at the Oscars, and I still think that will happen next weekend.

Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods. To not do so would be akin in my eyes to anything that some of you like to continually throw in the face of JD Tulane. Hell, one of you has a sig which is a direct and constant slap in his face.

Okay he didn't say he would close this thread. I'm wrong about that. I can't believe he would want to keep it open at this point though. Looking at the video, you will all get your wish soon enough. That should be enough of a victory, and you would think a mod would show some human dignity and close the thread on their own.

The fact that TMZ had to break this story is a disappointing indictment of the main stream media. ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, MSN, CNBC, and OAN should all be ashamed. The traditional media has become a dinosaur, and is now obsolete. Mostly due to self inflected wounds, like this story.

(02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote:  [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.


Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.

Post 133 in this thread

(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote:  [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.
Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.

Post 133 in this thread

Not in the post 133 that comes up on my computer.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-869432-post-15...id15884734

Shows up as post #133 for me (and page 7 but I realize pages are different based on how you are viewing the threads).

(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote:  [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.


Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.

Post 133 in this thread

He agreed to my suggestion of keeping the count going in the title. I don't see where he said he would remove the thread.

Although, I could see this thread evolving into a discussion of her health and fitness to serve. She did look very bad in the video you posted.

Anybody ask her where she was flying in from? Why was she in the airport?

(02-18-2019 09:55 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Anybody ask her where she was flying in from? Why was she in the airport?

The bold lie. It isn't her. It's the arrival of the double.

supposedly, the 'dixie darling' is 'physically' going to work today....

I'm certain you guys will let me know if 1 or 0....

(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote:  [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.


Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.

Post 133 in this thread

Here is what I see him say in post 133:

(02-05-2019 06:28 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 06:15 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  So, RBG went to a theatrical performance about her life, and those in charge didn't stop to recognize or highlight her attendance at the event? That makes absolutely no sense.

A public appearance implies that the public actually get to see the individual in question. Apparently, no one thought to snag a photo or video of her at this event. I find that hard to believe. She could have been there, but this report is far from proof. I say keep the count in the title going.

Till there is visual proof, it will keep going.

(02-19-2019 10:13 AM)q5sys Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote:  [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.


Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.

Post 133 in this thread

Here is what I see him say in post 133:

(02-05-2019 06:28 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 06:15 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  So, RBG went to a theatrical performance about her life, and those in charge didn't stop to recognize or highlight her attendance at the event? That makes absolutely no sense.

A public appearance implies that the public actually get to see the individual in question. Apparently, no one thought to snag a photo or video of her at this event. I find that hard to believe. She could have been there, but this report is far from proof. I say keep the count in the title going.

Till there is visual proof, it will keep going.

Since there is video of her from yesterday landing at the airport (where is she coming from? is that here double and that's why she's been kept out of the public? needed time to prep her?) The count in the thread title will remain where it is, to represent how long she was absent.

She must like that coat....

(02-19-2019 02:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

The shoes are the giveaway.

(02-19-2019 01:48 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(02-19-2019 10:13 AM)q5sys Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote:  [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.


Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.

Post 133 in this thread

Here is what I see him say in post 133:

(02-05-2019 06:28 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 06:15 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  So, RBG went to a theatrical performance about her life, and those in charge didn't stop to recognize or highlight her attendance at the event? That makes absolutely no sense.

A public appearance implies that the public actually get to see the individual in question. Apparently, no one thought to snag a photo or video of her at this event. I find that hard to believe. She could have been there, but this report is far from proof. I say keep the count in the title going.

Till there is visual proof, it will keep going.

Since there is video of her from yesterday landing at the airport (where is she coming from? is that here double and that's why she's been kept out of the public? needed time to prep her?) The count in the thread title will remain where it is, to represent how long she was absent.

Maybe now we can keep a count of how many times she falls asleep during arguments?



The really sad thing is that although the two Justices also pictured in the drawing look concerned about her apparent narcolepsy, they are obviously not concerned enough to make an issue of it.

(02-19-2019 08:52 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  

(02-19-2019 01:48 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(02-19-2019 10:13 AM)q5sys Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:24 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(02-18-2019 09:05 PM)q5sys Wrote:  [quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='15915006' dateline='1550540137']
Crimson absolutely said he would change the title of this thread and he can do that now on his own without the help of mods.


Citation needed. If he said that, I'll agree that he should stand by his word. I scanned through the thread and didn't find it, but perhaps I missed it. If he did say it, please link it.

Post 133 in this thread

Here is what I see him say in post 133:

(02-05-2019 06:28 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 06:15 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  So, RBG went to a theatrical performance about her life, and those in charge didn't stop to recognize or highlight her attendance at the event? That makes absolutely no sense.

A public appearance implies that the public actually get to see the individual in question. Apparently, no one thought to snag a photo or video of her at this event. I find that hard to believe. She could have been there, but this report is far from proof. I say keep the count in the title going.

Till there is visual proof, it will keep going.

Since there is video of her from yesterday landing at the airport (where is she coming from? is that here double and that's why she's been kept out of the public? needed time to prep her?) The count in the thread title will remain where it is, to represent how long she was absent.

Maybe now we can keep a count of how many times she falls asleep during arguments?



The really sad thing is that although the two Justices also pictured in the drawing look concerned about her apparent narcolepsy, they apparently are not concerned enough to make an issue of it.

that's just flat out freddie joe patek(ic)....

it's disturbing this hasn't gained more 'traction'....

she's turned her duty into a fk'n joke...

(02-19-2019 02:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

I'm a little interested in how she magically was cured of her kyphosis in the last two months. That usually takes years and/or intensive spinal surgery.

(02-19-2019 09:03 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(02-19-2019 02:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

I'm a little interested in how she magically was cured of her kyphosis in the last two months. That usually takes years and/or intensive spinal surgery.

Same shoes and pants even. What is the deal with the blue arrow?

Any pictures from today?

(02-19-2019 09:03 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(02-19-2019 02:12 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

I'm a little interested in how she magically was cured of her kyphosis in the last two months. That usually takes years and/or intensive spinal surgery.

Actually her head being upright is miraculous. Especially for someone who has supposedly been in bed for two months.