(02-10-2019 01:28 AM)chiefsfan Wrote: (02-09-2019 02:30 AM)TheRevSWT Wrote: I don't see the rationale for them doing a dog and pony show.
What I have gathered from most of the Arkansas residents is that even if the study said it was feasible, it would be near impossible to make it happen, as the "mighty" hogs and their supporters would ensure that the talent/media/interest pool isn't further diluted.
So a feasibility study wouldn't be needed to show it can't be done. Those that want football will dismiss it anyway, and those that don't care about football will just shrug and say "see? Told ya so."
If the MVC was legitimately such a good move for them, then they would have the rationale to move... because of their legitimate reasons.
A more likely (though still not likely at all) scenario would be that the original feasibility study showed that it would be possible to have an FBS team and that information was augmented to get the desired result, or just as bad: The firm was told what the outcome should be, and they worked backwards to support that notion.
EDIT: I was always pretty sure that feasibility studies were handled a lot like conference invites anyway, in that they aren't done if they truly don't know the answer already.
The truth is, Little Rock still doesn't sponsor the Sun Belt required number of sports to be a full time member. In theory, if the league could easily actually enforce their own rules there, but the Trojans are ignored because there's no real push from anyone to make that change.
There's been discussions before that the Trojans were a better fit for the MVC or Summit League, but they are happy in the Sun Belt, and the Sun Belt really doesn't have any impetus to go to all football schools. Nor does the MVC or Summit really seem that interested in UALR.
Also, since its come up before. I do not believe Arkansas State honestly cares one way or the other if UALR is a Sun Belt member. We like having a close conference game that's easy for our large Little Rock based alums to attend, but we could easily play them in OOC if they ever left. Provided we could replace them with someone reasonably close to Jonesboro *Stares directly at Missouri State* I don't think you'd see much of a push on our end to save them. Nor would there by any push to add UCA. That's just crazy talk. It benefits us to be clearly seen as the #2 team in the state.
When the American South and Sun Belt merged, a certain former UALR head coach then at Lamar tried to rally the votes to rescind the invitation the Sun Belt had extended to UALR prior to the merger. The consensus ended up being the league would do whatever AState wanted and AState's president said they invitation should be honored.
If we leave or UALR leaves, we are still going to play as long as UALR is interested and dates can be worked out.
After UALR went Division I the schools met 14 times in 12 years in basketball prior to UALR joining the Sun Belt.
Unless UALR were to go off the rails like Pony Excess, they will never be expelled on a straight expulsion vote because expulsion requires a unanimous vote and AState isn't voting to expel UALR unless its an incredibly ridiculous situation.
If you want to formalize rules designed to expel UALR by adopting some standard they cannot meet that requires 9 votes out 12 and you aren't going to get 9. UALR will vote no. AState will vote no and I suspect that ULM and UTA would vote no as well because UALR is a bus trip for them and both might well be concerned the target would be on their back next and 8 would be the most you could get.
The league has opted to not consider the Wyatt Committee standards binding (which would expel UALR, but if we had deemed them binding UTA couldn't have been admitted).
The reality is university presidents and AD's don't think like fans. UALR is an academic peer and they make the road swing to AState in men's and women's basketball and volleyball easier. Soccer and baseball are easy bus trips for AState, ULM and UTA.
UALR would be hard pressed to get in the Valley. The Valley turned down Murray State. UALR has made the NCAA Tournament five times since 1986 with two wins, Murray has gone 14 times and had three wins in that span. UALR has three NIT since 1987, Murray has gone five times. Murray draws better and is closer to more schools in the Valley.