The irony is this is what will get RvsW back to the Supreme Court. Ruthy baby, it’s time to retire, or be aborted.

NY should really be proud to promote murder as a great thing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

So disgusting.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I'm not surprised. Infuriated, yes. But Andrew Cuomo's leftist lunacy no longer surprises me. May God have mercy on their souls.

Of course, I believe abortion is murder regardless of trimester or circumstance. For as God said to Jeremiah in Jeremiah 1:5, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; Before you were born I sanctified you; I ordained you a prophet to the nations.” This means that God gives all of us purpose and meaning before we're even conceived! That's why I'm completely against the vile "practice" of abortion.

Like ericsrevenge said, I pray for God to forgive them since they have no idea what they have done. May God truly have mercy on their souls.

New York State (aka New York City State since they dominate the rest of the state) has driven out almost all normal, sane people. My mother-in-law's family are from Syracuse and only her mother is still there now. Everyone else in that family has been driven out by the garbage NYC orders through Albany.

Democrats are a death cult. No fetus left alive!

So, a baby can be nine months a day before being born and the mom can say, "Fuk it, I don't want this" and murder the baby?

(01-24-2019 08:49 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, a baby can be nine months a day before being born and the mom can say, "Fuk it, I don't want this" and murder the baby?

Quote:Under the Reproductive Health Act, non-doctors are now allowed to conduct abortions and the procedure could be done until the mother's due date if the woman's health is endangered or if the fetus is not viable.

But, I'm guessing "endangered" could mean anything to some.

(01-24-2019 08:49 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, a baby can be nine months a day before being born and the mom can say, "Fuk it, I don't want this" and murder the baby?

Not exactly.

Quote:Under New York's Reproductive Health Act, they can be performed after 24 weeks if the fetus is not viable or when necessary to protect the life of the mother.

BUT, couple that with...

Quote:Not only will the law preserve access to abortions, it also removes abortion from the state's criminal code. This would protect doctors or medical professionals who perform abortions from criminal prosecution. The law also now allows medical professionals who are not doctors to perform abortions in New York.

And I think the effect is yes. Any time, any reason.

CNN Story

(01-24-2019 08:49 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, a baby can be nine months a day before being born and the mom can say, "Fuk it, I don't want this" and murder the baby?

By letter of the law, no. By wiggle room written into the law, yes.

(01-24-2019 12:01 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  The irony is this is what will get RvsW back to the Supreme Court. Ruthy baby, it’s time to retire, or be aborted.

I don't know. Who's the plaintiff? A Dad maybe? Does he have standing?
And its moot by the time it gets to the Supreme Court. And does a conservative court want to do what a liberal court did and define when life starts?

Could this get challenged because of how far out of line it is with existing abortion laws in other states?

From what I understand there can only be an abortion if the life of the mother is endangered or if the baby isn't viable. Now, what that means as far as loopholes is still up for debate. To abort a full term baby is incomprehensible to me, however, I'm for states choosing to do what is right according to their citizenry. It sounds like they don't want citizenry, imo. And, they will have to face their maker one day.

(01-24-2019 09:42 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Could this get challenged because of how far out of line it is with existing abortion laws in other states?

I wondered this too. Does the commerce clause (same used for Obamacare iirc) not apply to an unborn child that WOULD be viable outside of the womb?

Doesn't a c section to remove the baby before it causes the mother harm make vastly more sense?

this is sickening, but not surprised is happening in NY.

Another way for leftists to decrease the minority population and getting that same population to argue for it for them.

You have one poor child that lives through the procedure. That child may have standing to challenge the law.

(01-24-2019 12:17 AM)Jjoey52 Wrote:  NY should really be proud to promote murder as a great thing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Typical liberal twisted mind thinking. God forbid you defend your life with a weapon, but the state will look the other way and permit murder as long as it's in a clinical setting. So there is no sanctity to life, but as long as murder is handled in aesthetically acceptable and much less visible ways it's fine. So, as in Bram Stoker's Dracula horror is masked by the appearance of culture and elegance.

Curious, how many pregnant women who carry a baby for 8+ months just decide at the last moment, "Ya know...I no longer want this baby, so I'll just abort it for no other reason than that."

(01-24-2019 11:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious, how many pregnant women who carry a baby for 8+ months just decide at the last moment, "Ya know...I no longer want this baby, so I'll just abort it for no other reason than that."

1 would be too many.

I don't understand how this can stand. I cannot wrap my head around the callous disregard for the sanctity of life on display in this.