(03-25-2018 08:32 PM)Claw Wrote:  Ok. I'll go get the details myself. I am disappointed in this forum.

She lowered the accusation from "affair" to "one-night-stand" -- a fact pointed out by my wife. My wife claims an affair and a one-night-stand are different things.

So it seems her story has already changed.

She did confirm she consented.

This event supposedly occurred in 2006.

Her pupils were massively dilated, under TV lights no less. Many people are saying this is indicative of drug use such as cocaine.

She claimed that in 2011 someone threatened her to keep quiet.

So an assumed drug addict prostitute (to use a nicer way of putting it) who changed her story is the current hope of the left.


Oh, and here's this nugget:

Did Stormy Daniels’ Lawyer Implicate Himself or His Client in a Crime?
by Robert Barnes | 11:07 am, March 26th, 2018

(03-27-2018 10:33 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 10:26 AM)JTiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 06:55 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  60 minutes is reality TV now, interview real housewives of Atlanta.

This is the current news cycle with the sitting POTUS.

I have no doubt he had sex with her but the question here is did he pay for her silence with campaign money? If so, that's a no no.

He didn't run on a family values platform but neither did Bill Clinton and the GOP went after him like sharks in chummed waters over a BJ with an intern.

Many of Trumps supporters who are/were W. Bush family values voters seem to be turning a blind eye to all this.

Trump didn't do it in the Oval Office with an employee. And it was before he was president, it was consensual and it was par for the course for him. "Trump cheated on wife" is as much news as "dog bites man."

Is getting a hooker still illegal?

(03-27-2018 11:58 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-25-2018 08:32 PM)Claw Wrote:  Ok. I'll go get the details myself. I am disappointed in this forum.

She lowered the accusation from "affair" to "one-night-stand" -- a fact pointed out by my wife. My wife claims an affair and a one-night-stand are different things.

So it seems her story has already changed.

She did confirm she consented.

This event supposedly occurred in 2006.

Her pupils were massively dilated, under TV lights no less. Many people are saying this is indicative of drug use such as cocaine.

She claimed that in 2011 someone threatened her to keep quiet.

So an assumed drug addict prostitute (to use a nicer way of putting it) who changed her story is the current hope of the left.


Oh, and here's this nugget:

Did Stormy Daniels’ Lawyer Implicate Himself or His Client in a Crime?
by Robert Barnes | 11:07 am, March 26th, 2018

That's not a good sign for you bro.

(03-27-2018 10:26 AM)JTiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 06:55 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  60 minutes is reality TV now, interview real housewives of Atlanta.

This is the current news cycle with the sitting POTUS.

I have no doubt he had sex with her but the question here is did he pay for her silence with campaign money? If so, that's a no no.

He didn't run on a family values platform but neither did Bill Clinton and the GOP went after him like sharks in chummed waters over a BJ with an intern.

Many of Trumps supporters who are/were W. Bush family values voters seem to be turning a blind eye to all this.

It is perfectly fine. If there is a crime here it is extortion by Daniels. Extortion is illegal, paying the money is not.

(03-27-2018 01:14 PM)JTiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 11:58 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-25-2018 08:32 PM)Claw Wrote:  Ok. I'll go get the details myself. I am disappointed in this forum.

She lowered the accusation from "affair" to "one-night-stand" -- a fact pointed out by my wife. My wife claims an affair and a one-night-stand are different things.

So it seems her story has already changed.

She did confirm she consented.

This event supposedly occurred in 2006.

Her pupils were massively dilated, under TV lights no less. Many people are saying this is indicative of drug use such as cocaine.

She claimed that in 2011 someone threatened her to keep quiet.

So an assumed drug addict prostitute (to use a nicer way of putting it) who changed her story is the current hope of the left.


Oh, and here's this nugget:

Did Stormy Daniels’ Lawyer Implicate Himself or His Client in a Crime?
by Robert Barnes | 11:07 am, March 26th, 2018

That's not a good sign for you bro.

lol... I hear ya.

(03-27-2018 01:15 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 10:26 AM)JTiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 06:55 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  60 minutes is reality TV now, interview real housewives of Atlanta.

This is the current news cycle with the sitting POTUS.

I have no doubt he had sex with her but the question here is did he pay for her silence with campaign money? If so, that's a no no.

He didn't run on a family values platform but neither did Bill Clinton and the GOP went after him like sharks in chummed waters over a BJ with an intern.

Many of Trumps supporters who are/were W. Bush family values voters seem to be turning a blind eye to all this.

It is perfectly fine. If there is a crime here it is extortion by Daniels. Extortion is illegal, paying the money is not.

It may not be fine if he used campaign money. It's like the cover up being worse than the crime. I'm sure he has the money in his own pocket to pay the hush money but if it came from campaign money then it can be a crime. I agree that she isn't guild free in all this but she doesn't have much to lose versus Trump. It's not like her dignity is intact, she banged Trump.

As a lib I have to admit asking myself why this whole deal is getting so much air time. While it affirms the sleazy nature of Trump, that's something everybody already knew. Most cons don't care, the evangelists don't care, only libs who are trying to get elected care.
I'm thinking the thought is to erode as much support as possible, a % here a % there could make a difference in the next election.
What I am truly disappointed in and I'm serious, is the totally unwarranted amount of air time this thing has gotten. It really does call into question the motives of MSM. Call me disappointed.

(03-27-2018 05:29 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  As a lib I have to admit asking myself why this whole deal is getting so much air time. While it affirms the sleazy nature of Trump, that's something everybody already knew. Most cons don't care, the evangelists don't care, only libs who are trying to get elected care.
I'm thinking the thought is to erode as much support as possible, a % here a % there could make a difference in the next election.
What I am truly disappointed in and I'm serious, is the totally unwarranted amount of air time this thing has gotten. It really does call into question the motives of MSM. Call me disappointed.

This is one are where I can honestly say the Democrats swayed my opinion. I now line up with them 100% on this.


JFK's womanizing wasn't an issue.

POTUS Bill Clinton's Oval Office...


So, Dems, you've convinced me. If it happens on their private time, who cares?

(03-27-2018 02:00 PM)JTiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 01:15 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 10:26 AM)JTiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2018 06:55 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  60 minutes is reality TV now, interview real housewives of Atlanta.

This is the current news cycle with the sitting POTUS.

I have no doubt he had sex with her but the question here is did he pay for her silence with campaign money? If so, that's a no no.

He didn't run on a family values platform but neither did Bill Clinton and the GOP went after him like sharks in chummed waters over a BJ with an intern.

Many of Trumps supporters who are/were W. Bush family values voters seem to be turning a blind eye to all this.

It is perfectly fine. If there is a crime here it is extortion by Daniels. Extortion is illegal, paying the money is not.

It may not be fine if he used campaign money. It's like the cover up being worse than the crime. I'm sure he has the money in his own pocket to pay the hush money but if it came from campaign money then it can be a crime. I agree that she isn't guild free in all this but she doesn't have much to lose versus Trump. It's not like her dignity is intact, she banged Trump.

I think the porn star lost any dignity long before Trump.

Been out of the loop a couple of days. I see the MSM narrative has spun from Russia Russia Russia to Stormy Stormy Stormy. At least this is entertaining.

(03-27-2018 07:54 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Been out of the loop a couple of days. I see the MSM narrative has spun from Russia Russia Russia to Stormy Stormy Stormy. At least this is entertaining.

It is nothing but a Stormy Russian Collusion.

(03-27-2018 05:29 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  As a lib I have to admit asking myself why this whole deal is getting so much air time. While it affirms the sleazy nature of Trump, that's something everybody already knew. Most cons don't care, the evangelists don't care, only libs who are trying to get elected care.
I'm thinking the thought is to erode as much support as possible, a % here a % there could make a difference in the next election.
What I am truly disappointed in and I'm serious, is the totally unwarranted amount of air time this thing has gotten. It really does call into question the motives of MSM. Call me disappointed.

I think it's the death by a thousand cuts theory. The GOP hedged their bets on the birth certificate "big deal" rather than this method. Mid terms are coming up and they intend to capitalize on the eroding support in key districts. In order to really stop trump they need to win back the house or senate and they know that.

(03-27-2018 07:54 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Been out of the loop a couple of days. I see the MSM narrative has spun from Russia Russia Russia to Stormy Stormy Stormy. At least this is entertaining.

My wife was interested for some reason, but said the interview was really boring. Not entertaining.

I guess trying to stretch a routine one night stand into a months long story is kind of difficult.

I am overwhelmed with irony since Clinton did far worse yet is lionized.

Isn't this "none of our business" since it is Trumps "personal life", right liberals ?

Liberalism, thy name is.....oh to hell with it....liberalism is all things fracked up....

What I don't get is why would Trump want to lay down with an overcooked dollar menu burger made from pink slime when he can get Filet Mignon ?

(03-28-2018 09:22 AM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  What I don't get is why would Trump want to lay down with an overcooked dollar menu burger made from pink slime when he can get Filet Mignon ?

Because he can.

(03-28-2018 09:22 AM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  What I don't get is why would Trump want to lay down with an overcooked dollar menu burger made from pink slime when he can get Filet Mignon ?

CAuse by the time he gets it well done with ketchup, they are both the same.

(03-28-2018 09:45 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(03-28-2018 09:22 AM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  What I don't get is why would Trump want to lay down with an overcooked dollar menu burger made from pink slime when he can get Filet Mignon ?

CAuse by the time he gets it well done with ketchup, they are both the same.

So true.

(03-28-2018 12:43 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(03-28-2018 09:45 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(03-28-2018 09:22 AM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  What I don't get is why would Trump want to lay down with an overcooked dollar menu burger made from pink slime when he can get Filet Mignon ?

CAuse by the time he gets it well done with ketchup, they are both the same.

So true.

I'm sorry guys but I respectfully disagree. Melania Trump looks better in the morning when she rolls out of bed than any drug addict adult "film" star that is made up with modern day cosmetics.

A good woman is a good woman. And a good woman is a Filet Mignon, regardless of what she looks like since a good woman will never be "ragged out" and "loose" like this other one....and TBH, just describing a thing like that creeps me out.....I might be a guy but I wouldn't touch her if she was the last woman on Earth....