Attempting to trigger another unhinged, alt-left terrorist like james t. hodgkinson or floyd lee corkins.

Quote:Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) reportedly took time during a Huntington, New York, speech to suggest that people should take up arms against President Trump.
Roll Call reports the Suozzi talked of putting pressure on Trump, saying, “This is where the Second Amendment comes in, quite frankly. Because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?”

An audience member responded by asking the essence of the Second Amendment and Suozzi said, “The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms.”

According to the New York Post, nervousness was evident among attendees. National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin said, “This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the president of the United States.”

http://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2...ssion=true

Where are the Democrats coming out and telling their psychotic followers to knock it off?

Fox News story with the video. Chilling.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/...trump.html

Nancy boy there probably hasn't even fired off a pellet rifle.

Quote:May 30, 2010—Sharron Angle, a candidate for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senator in Nevada, tells the Reno Gazette-Journal that a recent increase in gun sales nationwide "tells me that the nation is arming. What are they arming for if it isn't that they are so distrustful of government? They're afraid they'll have to fight for their liberty in more Second Amendment kinds of ways." These comments echo ones made by Angle in January, when she told conservative radio show talk host Lars Larson, "You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years. I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take [U.S. Senator from Nevada] Harry Reid out."

And yes, they're both in the wrong.

This guy needs to realize that the skeletons in his closet are now zombies and are coming back to life:

https://nypost.com/2004/01/28/rape-case-...-l-i-dems/
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/21/nyregi...andal.html

A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

I don't even have to click the "view post" icon to know that Redtom's post is whataboutism. It's what he does.

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

Ever heard of impeachment?

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

The hell? What do you think happens? The president is impeached and removed from office, or voted out of office. Both are almost guaranteed to end peaceably.

What other fantasy might you have?

(03-19-2018 12:29 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

The hell? What do you think happens? The president is impeached and removed from office, or voted out of office. Both are almost guaranteed to end peaceably.

What other fantasy might you have?

Oh dear. You might have opened up a can of worms by asking a liberal that, lol...

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

Do it. See how it works out

(03-19-2018 12:29 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

The hell? What do you think happens? The president is impeached and removed from office, or voted out of office. Both are almost guaranteed to end peaceably.

What other fantasy might you have?

First off I have no fanstasies about this. I personally think the investigations will continue until Trump loses in 2020 or just decides not to run. But if it happens the way you say it does then why do we need guns?

(03-19-2018 12:33 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:29 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

The hell? What do you think happens? The president is impeached and removed from office, or voted out of office. Both are almost guaranteed to end peaceably.

What other fantasy might you have?

Oh dear. You might have opened up a can of worms by asking a liberal that, lol...

I am not a liberal but BS is BS

(03-19-2018 12:33 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

Do it. See how it works out

Thanks for proving my point

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

Not really.

If it ever came down to civil war between the two political spectrums in this country we would mow through y'all like a Dixie Chopper through the first grass of spring.

Bearing arms is more than just the possession, it's possessing the knowledge and proficiency to use them when the time comes. Y'all will be too busy looking for your 30 round clips to do much practice and your pink puzzy hats will make target acquisition that much easier with our deer rifles.

(03-19-2018 12:24 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  I don't even have to click the "view post" icon to know that Redtom's post is whataboutism. It's what he does.

Because you just want your views encouraged and not open to actual discussion snowflake

(03-19-2018 12:36 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

Not really.

If it ever came down to civil war between the two political spectrums in this country we would mow through y'all like a Dixie Chopper through the first grass of spring.

Bearing arms is more than just the possession, it's possessing the knowledge and proficiency to use them when the time comes. Y'all will be too busy looking for your 30 round clips to do much practice and your pink puzzy hats will make target acquisition that much easier with our deer rifles.

The South thought the same thing and are still butthirt how that turned out.

Edit: Many gun owners have little to no training. Let alone military/militia training. It is not as cut and dry as you make it out to be

(03-19-2018 12:36 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:33 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

Do it. See how it works out

Thanks for proving my point

It appears that this has become the all-new "go to" phrase when someone doesn't want to put their ideas out there properly.

IMO, that phrase is the new version of "whatever".

(03-19-2018 12:38 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:36 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  A what if scenario was presented and a possible outcome from that scenario was the president not following the law. Now if the political party in power was different you guys would be screaming about tryranny and the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not so enthusiastic when the people who want to bear arms don’t share your same political views. Ish gets real right?

Not really.

If it ever came down to civil war between the two political spectrums in this country we would mow through y'all like a Dixie Chopper through the first grass of spring.

Bearing arms is more than just the possession, it's possessing the knowledge and proficiency to use them when the time comes. Y'all will be too busy looking for your 30 round clips to do much practice and your pink puzzy hats will make target acquisition that much easier with our deer rifles.

The South thought the same thing and are still butthirt how that turned out.

The South was martially superior to the Union invaders. That war, like most wars do, came down to logistics.

Logistics wouldn't be a problem for the right in a future civil war.