Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
Author Message
UofMstateU Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,216
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 1457
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #1
Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
Its about damned time.

The Trump administration announced Thursday that it will open the door for states to impose work requirements for Medicaid recipients, in a major shift that could affect millions of low-income people receiving benefits.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services described the decision as a response to requests from states to test work requirement programs.

“Medicaid needs to be more flexible so that states can best address the needs of this population. Our fundamental goal is to make a positive and lasting difference in the health and wellness of our beneficiaries, and today’s announcement is a step in that direction,” CMS Administrator Seema Verna said in a statement.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/...ement.html
01-11-2018 09:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

usmbacker Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,913
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 889
I Root For: Beer
Location: Margaritaville
Post: #2
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
[Image: 282j8zn.jpg]
01-11-2018 09:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ark30inf Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,643
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation: 588
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #3
Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
01-11-2018 09:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,216
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 1457
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

We're not dealing with 95 year olds here, nor 8 year olds. We will be dealing with 50% of all medicaid recipients. The ones that fall between 19 and 64, who until now, were allowed to sit on their ass and have their healthcare paid for by the working american.

If its too much for a bureaucrat to handle, we can simply shut off medicaid for that age group altogether.
01-11-2018 10:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CardFan1 Offline
Red Thunderbird
*

Posts: 13,806
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 546
I Root For: Louisville ACC
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
If You clear out the illegals, then there will be millions of jobs opening up for many of these that don't have jobs to be able to fill them. Lots of Americans on Welfare are ones that gave up looking for work because their skill levels were lacking and got on gov assistance to survive. When Welfare to work came up under Clinton, millions started working, many remained on work force payrolls. Obama changed it back to no requirement to work, thus millions got on Gov assistance again.
01-11-2018 10:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Online
laughing at MSM meltdown
*

Posts: 37,900
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1718
I Root For: StL Cards & USM
Location: who knows?
Post: #6
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

We're not dealing with 95 year olds here, nor 8 year olds. We will be dealing with 50% of all medicaid recipients. The ones that fall between 19 and 64, who until now, were allowed to sit on their ass and have their healthcare paid for by the working american.

If its too much for a bureaucrat to handle, we can simply shut off medicaid for that age group altogether.

04-rock04-rock04-rock
01-11-2018 10:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

ark30inf Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,643
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation: 588
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

We're not dealing with 95 year olds here, nor 8 year olds. We will be dealing with 50% of all medicaid recipients. The ones that fall between 19 and 64, who until now, were allowed to sit on their ass and have their healthcare paid for by the working american.

If its too much for a bureaucrat to handle, we can simply shut off medicaid for that age group altogether.

Thats all well and good, but I have been around long enough to know how this works.

Just like when you order the deportation of MS-13 and the bureacrats immediately find a nice crying lady with cancer and three kids to handcuff and leak it to the press to show how mean Republicans are.

You have to make systemic changes to the system, not just tell the current system to act differently. It won't.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
01-11-2018 10:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,792
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 885
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #8
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Huh?

This is about Medicaid, not Medicare.

I don't think this is a good idea.
01-11-2018 10:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Proud traitor.
*

Posts: 31,400
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 528
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Post: #9
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 10:14 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  If You clear out the illegals, then there will be millions of jobs opening up for many of these that don't have jobs to be able to fill them. Lots of Americans on Welfare are ones that gave up looking for work because their skill levels were lacking and got on gov assistance to survive. When Welfare to work came up under Clinton, millions started working, many remained on work force payrolls. Obama changed it back to no requirement to work, thus millions got on Gov assistance again.

I don't believe that's a clear representation of what actually happened.

Quote:...the Obama administration issued a memo telling states they could apply to have some aspects of the law's work requirements waived.

...the memo in question explicitly requires states that apply for waivers to propose plans that would increase, not decrease, the amount of welfare recipients working. But if that's the case, why waive any aspect of the work requirements? What, exactly, would the waivers in question -- none of which have yet been issued -- do?

The answer is that the states, and the Obama administration, do want to be able to give benefits to more people who aren't working as currently defined. But they say the problem is that the current definitions are too restrictive, and that loosening them would lead to more people getting jobs and being self-sufficient in the long run.

"The law sets forward a very complicated measure of work participation that pretty much all sides agree should be changed," said Liz Schott, an expert on the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program for the left-leaning Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. "It's too complicated and it doesn't measure the right things."
What Obama Really Did to Welfare Reform

Do you have other information to support your claim?
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2018 10:36 AM by Redwingtom.)
01-11-2018 10:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fitbud Offline
Banned

Posts: 30,986
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Who cares as long as we get to keep more of our money right?01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle
01-11-2018 11:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ark30inf Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,643
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation: 588
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 11:09 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Who cares as long as we get to keep more of our money right?01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle
If you get to keep a few more cents...it'll just run up the debt a few more cents...because they won't actually stop spending.

Republicans are afraid to actually change the system, so they piddle around the edges like this.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
01-11-2018 11:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Fitbud Offline
Banned

Posts: 30,986
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 11:17 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 11:09 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Who cares as long as we get to keep more of our money right?01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle
If you get to keep a few more cents...it'll just run up the debt a few more cents...because they won't actually stop spending.

Republicans are afraid to actually change the system, so they piddle around the edges like this.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Yeah I agree. But stuff like this plays well with that 30 % of the country.
01-11-2018 11:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Online
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 55,864
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 1130
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #13
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 11:17 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 11:09 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.
The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
Who cares as long as we get to keep more of our money right?01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle
If you get to keep a few more cents...it'll just run up the debt a few more cents...because they won't actually stop spending.
Republicans are afraid to actually change the system, so they piddle around the edges like this.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

This is what drives me up the wall. There are much better ways to run health and welfare. They are out there today working well. There are better ways to tax. They are out there today and working. But instead of changing the systems to something better, republicans seem content just to spend less on democrat programs. Democrat lite instead of change for the better.

Bismarck health care to replace Medicaid and ultimately phase out Medicare. A guaranteed minimum basic income to replace our welfare hodgepodge. Pay for it with a consumption tax which generates enough additional revenues to balance the budget and lower and flatten income tax rates. Make that a true alternative platform. Is that conservative? If you accept Barry Goldwater’s principle of, “proven ways, not because they are old but because they are true,” then not just yes but hell yes. These are things that work where they have been tried. They are based on providing a safety net, not massive redistribution of wealth and income. That makes them conservative in my book.

You can argue that “tax and spend” democrats are right or you can argue that “deficit and spend” republicans are right. I would say that neither is right—and neither is conservative.
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2018 08:39 PM by Owl 69/70/75.)
01-11-2018 12:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ark30inf Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,643
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation: 588
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #14
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 12:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 11:17 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 11:09 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.
The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
Who cares as long as we get to keep more of our money right?01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle
If you get to keep a few more cents...it'll just run up the debt a few more cents...because they won't actually stop spending.
Republicans are afraid to actually change the system, so they piddle around the edges like this.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

This is what drives me up the wall. There are much better ways to run health and welfare. They are out there today working well. There are better ways to tax. They are out there today and working. But instead of changing the systems to something better, republicans seem content just to spend less on democrat programs. Democrat lite instead of change for the better.

Bismarck health care to replace Medicaid and ultimately phase out Medicare. A guaranteed minimum basic income to replace our welfare hodgepodge. Pay for it with a consumption tax which generates enough additional revenues to balance the budget and lower and flatten income tax rates. Make that a true alternative platform. Is that conservative? If you accept Barry Goldwater’s principle of, “proven ways, not because they are old but because they are true,” then he’ll yes. These are things that work where they have been tried. They are based on providing a safety net, not massive distribution of wealth and income. That makes them conservative in my book.

You can argue that “tax and spend” democrats are right or you can argue that “deficit and spend” republicans are right. I would say that neither is right—and neither is conservative.
Pretty much matches my opinions.

At some point in the past conservatism had an intellectual component that was constantly proposing new ideas under the conservative philosophy and trying to be creative. That seems to have gone away to some extent leaving us with a minimalized unchanging set of disjointed maxims.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
01-11-2018 12:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
arkstfan Online
Sorry folks
*

Posts: 22,206
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 652
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
Post: #15
Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
My concern. If Dad is a slug will that knock his children off Medicaid?
Also what happens if Joe Smith is hit by an uninsured driver and losses his job and has applied for disability? Odds are he’s looking at 24 months before disability is approved then up to another 24 months before he qualifies for Medicare as being disabled. That up to four years with no treatment if the work requirements catch him. And you can just exempt people if they’ve only applied but not been approved because you’ll flood the system with applications after seven straight years of declines in applications and declining numbers of people on disability.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
01-11-2018 02:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Online
laughing at MSM meltdown
*

Posts: 37,900
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1718
I Root For: StL Cards & USM
Location: who knows?
Post: #16
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 12:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 11:17 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 11:09 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.
The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
Who cares as long as we get to keep more of our money right?01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle
If you get to keep a few more cents...it'll just run up the debt a few more cents...because they won't actually stop spending.
Republicans are afraid to actually change the system, so they piddle around the edges like this.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

This is what drives me up the wall. There are much better ways to run health and welfare. They are out there today working well. There are better ways to tax. They are out there today and working. But instead of changing the systems to something better, republicans seem content just to spend less on democrat programs. Democrat lite instead of change for the better.

Bismarck health care to replace Medicaid and ultimately phase out Medicare. A guaranteed minimum basic income to replace our welfare hodgepodge. Pay for it with a consumption tax which generates enough additional revenues to balance the budget and lower and flatten income tax rates. Make that a true alternative platform. Is that conservative? If you accept Barry Goldwater’s principle of, “proven ways, not because they are old but because they are true,” then not just yes but hell yes. These are things that work where they have been tried. They are based on providing a safety net, not massive distribution of wealth and income. That makes them conservative in my book.

You can argue that “tax and spend” democrats are right or you can argue that “deficit and spend” republicans are right. I would say that neither is right—and neither is conservative.

#henceDJT

gotta start blowing up the status quo somehow....and as I've stated on too many occasions, we see the same thing but view from a different lens relative to the 'how'

it's going to be interesting to see how this 'experiment' plays out.....so far, so good.....
01-11-2018 02:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

DavidSt Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,491
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 131
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

We're not dealing with 95 year olds here, nor 8 year olds. We will be dealing with 50% of all medicaid recipients. The ones that fall between 19 and 64, who until now, were allowed to sit on their ass and have their healthcare paid for by the working american.

If its too much for a bureaucrat to handle, we can simply shut off medicaid for that age group altogether.


There are people between 19 and 64 who can't work with some type of disabilities and health issues that prevents them from working. The problem that I am seeing is completely wrong is that Meth users could get SSI because they call addictions as a disability. They were not born that way. It is a choice for them to ruin their bodies. While people who are born with a disability or had an accident that they got a broken backs are having a hard time to get SSI. That is where some of the reform needs to take place. When people who do have a disability are having troubles getting SSI, Medicaid department would think that you are able to work when they are not.
01-11-2018 04:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ark30inf Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,643
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation: 588
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #18
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 04:58 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.

The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

We're not dealing with 95 year olds here, nor 8 year olds. We will be dealing with 50% of all medicaid recipients. The ones that fall between 19 and 64, who until now, were allowed to sit on their ass and have their healthcare paid for by the working american.

If its too much for a bureaucrat to handle, we can simply shut off medicaid for that age group altogether.


There are people between 19 and 64 who can't work with some type of disabilities and health issues that prevents them from working. The problem that I am seeing is completely wrong is that Meth users could get SSI because they call addictions as a disability. They were not born that way. It is a choice for them to ruin their bodies. While people who are born with a disability or had an accident that they got a broken backs are having a hard time to get SSI. That is where some of the reform needs to take place. When people who do have a disability are having troubles getting SSI, Medicaid department would think that you are able to work when they are not.

Government is just as bad at charity as it is at most other things.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
01-11-2018 05:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Online
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 55,864
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 1130
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #19
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 12:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 11:17 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 11:09 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  
(01-11-2018 09:51 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  The problem is that you will need bureaucrats who will manage things properly...and they do not exist.
The result will be 95-year old cancer patients denied coverage and 40 year old drug dealers forging their way with a resume on a napkin.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
Who cares as long as we get to keep more of our money right?01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle
If you get to keep a few more cents...it'll just run up the debt a few more cents...because they won't actually stop spending.
Republicans are afraid to actually change the system, so they piddle around the edges like this.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

This is what drives me up the wall. There are much better ways to run health and welfare. They are out there today working well. There are better ways to tax. They are out there today and working. But instead of changing the systems to something better, republicans seem content just to spend less on democrat programs. Democrat lite instead of change for the better.

Bismarck health care to replace Medicaid and ultimately phase out Medicare. A guaranteed minimum basic income to replace our welfare hodgepodge. Pay for it with a consumption tax which generates enough additional revenues to balance the budget and lower and flatten income tax rates. Make that a true alternative platform. Is that conservative? If you accept Barry Goldwater’s principle of, “proven ways, not because they are old but because they are true,” then not just yes but hell yes. These are things that work where they have been tried. They are based on providing a safety net, not massive redistribution of wealth and income. That makes them conservative in my book.

You can argue that “tax and spend” democrats are right or you can argue that “deficit and spend” republicans are right. I would say that neither is right—and neither is conservative.

And while you're at it, decriminalize marijuana and make abortion legal with restrictions and focus on making the alternatives such as adoption less difficult and expensive. That includes the basic concept that adoption by a gay couple is better than abortion.

Let republicans be the party of economic and personal freedom with a safety net. Let democrats be the collectivists/redistributionists/socialists/communists. Make it about issues and not personalities. Unless they are running against Hillary, republicans can't win a personality contest, but they can win a contest of ideas. I think that's a win for the republicans. It certainly wins my vote.
01-11-2018 08:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
olliebaba Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,095
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation: 876
I Root For: Christ
Location: El Paso
Post: #20
RE: Trump proposes Medicaid work requirements
(01-11-2018 09:30 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  [Image: 282j8zn.jpg]

They're talking about YOU, brother in law.
01-11-2018 09:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.