(09-09-2017 06:59 AM)Steve1981 Wrote: Fighting Muskie why do you think the MAC bridge is burnt.
Look at it from a non-UMass perspective. Put yourself in a MAC school's shoes.
They offered full membership and you said no, at potentially great cost to your fledgling football program. And you did it for the sake of your mighty basketball program--which has played one game anyone that anyone outside Amherst cared about in the last 20 years. (2014 NCAA game).
So why would they offer again? They're at a good number, their schools aren't anyone else's expansion candidates, they're regional. They don't need anyone or anything right now. And if they do need in the future, why you and not Missouri State or North Dakota State or Delaware or James MAdison or Eastern Kentucky or heck Northern Kentucky?
Quote: It does not make economic sense for the MAC to take in two university. The bridge still exists but is extremely costly to cross.
More important than anything is to start taking business on the field and improve the facilities. The conference and building facilities is the head wind with recruiting and the catch-22 for success on the field. UMass has land, so not sure if it can sell some or put it out to private development to help with the football facilities. To me, facility improvements, which includes an IPF, is my leading indicator how successful UMass Football will become.
Or as others have said, UMass stop doing FBS Football on the cheap. Start investing in football like everyone else. If you are not investing, you are moving backwards.
Except what is the plausible scenario for how those FBS investments start to pay off? What exactly does FBS UMass look like in 10 years that's not a total pipe dream? What sort of win-loss record, what sort of attendance?
How does a school with no FBS tradition, a precarious long-term FBS future, in a poor recruiting area, with a barely-FBS stadium with plenty of empty seats, overshadowed locally by a P5 school in the big metro area, and also by a next-door neighbor flagship with a clearly superior athletic department, get out of that hole?
Realistically, you look at that list and you expect 2-10 seasons to be about as common as 6 win seasons. So how does this get better?