Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate Group"
Author Message
DefCONNOne Offline
That damn MLS!!

Posts: 11,012
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: UCONN
Location: MLS HQ
Post: #21
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-15-2017 11:22 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 11:12 AM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 10:42 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 10:28 AM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 10:20 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  They advocate for the legality of throwing all Gay people into jailcamps for the 'crime' of being LGBT. They work with the World Congress of Families at the UN. Yea, they qualify.

Source?

How many do you want?

How about the ADF cheering an INdian Ruling criminalizing being LGBT and has been used to throw hundreds of Indians into Prison.

"When given the same choice the Supreme Court of the United States had in Lawrence vs. Texas, the Indian Court did the right thing. India chose to protect society at large rather than give in to a vocal minority of homosexual advocates. … America needs to take note that a country of 1.2 billion people has rejected the road towards same-sex marriage, and understood that these kinds of bad decisions in the long run will harm society."

—Benjamin Bull, executive director of ADF Global, on the recriminalization of homosexuality in India, 2013

“The issue under rational-basis review is not whether Texas should be concerned about opposite-sex sodomy, but whether it is reasonable to believe that same-sex sodomy is a distinct public health problem. It clearly is.”

—ADF attorney Glen Lavy, counsel of record, amicus brief, Lawrence v. Texas, 2003

---

Let me know if you'd like to read their amicus briefs.

They have extensive links to Russia, where at least 27 LGBT men have been executed this year in Southern Russia's Gay Concentration Camp. The detentions have restarted btw. I suppose Trump gave the green light for it.

You post a typical inflammatory statement about a Christian based group supporting jail camps for homosexuals. I'm calling you out to give me a source or quote that matches your ridiculous statement. You give examples of their supposed positions but make the leap across the Grand Canyon that they advocate for jail camps.

No, actually, the quote by the leader of the ADF, appears to be a full throated endorsement of the criminalization of being Gay. That means jail. And it has meant jail.

In the Lawrence v Texas case, the case did involve around a CRIMINAL arrest for the crime of non-commercial, consensual sex between unrelated adults in the privacy of their own bedroom. And yet the ADF wanted that to remain illegal. Laws like it were used to enhance penalties for LGBT persons as well. 2 years for crime x if straight, 20 if LGBT.

Beyond that, the ADF or its leaders, appear to pal around with the World Congress of Families as they seek to defend jail for LGBT persons around the world, the denial of even basic human rights for LGBT persons, and even palling around with Putin's genocidally anti-LGBT regime in Russia.

By the way, they have lawyers. Lots of lawyers. They can sue ABC or even me if they'd like to have a court decide whether calling the ADF a 'hate group' is libelous. They won't because they'd lose and the only impact of a lawsuit would be to highlight their advocacy. As well as so much discovery that might expose their activities to further scrutiny.

These aren't supposed positions, but direct quotes. Again, why not go to the website and look up their amicus briefs. You asked for sources, I provided sources. Its up to you to either accept them, ignore them, or discredit them.

---

At best the ADF appears to work directly to defend the legality of throwing all Gay people into jail for the 'crime' of being Gay.

---

So no, it isn't fake news to describe the ADF as a 'hate group', unless you think that jailing people for the 'crime' of existing isn't hateful
It isn't libelous either to call them a 'hate group' either

And unless you wish to define "religious liberty" as the right to throw people who don't follow your religious dictates into prison for the 'crime' of not allowing them to tell you what kind of sex you can have, I'd challenge the title calling them a "religious liberty org".

To summarize...you have zero sources to back up your lies and deceit. Standard operating procedure, for one Tom in Lazybrook.
07-15-2017 11:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,147
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 438
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #22
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-15-2017 11:29 AM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  Straight from the horse's mouth (web site):

Quote:Who We Are
We've Defended Your Freedom Since 1994


The morning Alliance Defending Freedom was launched, Dr. Bill Bright told a story about a little boy who was lost in a wheat field. The townspeople frantically searched for the boy, but they couldn’t find him. Finally, one of the searchers suggested that they all hold hands and walk together across the field. They found the boy, but sadly, not in time to save his life. One of the searchers lamented, "If we had only linked arms sooner..."

Dr. Bright compared the town’s story to the Christian community.

The gathered Christian leaders—more than 30 founders of ADF—recognized that Christians, like the town, needed to unite in order to defend religious freedom before it was too late.

And so, Alliance Defending Freedom was launched on January 31, 1994 to ensure that religious freedom did not share the same fate as the boy in the field.

Building an Alliance for Victory

With that launch, the Christian community gained growing awareness that the threats to its freedom were multiplying. The legal system, which was built on a moral and Christian foundation, had been steadily moving against religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and marriage and family. And very few Christians were showing up in court to put up a fight.

By funding cases, training attorneys, and successfully advocating for freedom in court, Alliance Defending Freedom changed that.

Advocacy
Transforming Law & Culture

It is not enough to just win cases; we must change the culture, and the strategy of Alliance Defending Freedom ensures lasting victory.

What is Alliance Defending Freedom?
Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.

Why were you formed?
For decades, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and its allies used the courts to drive out public expressions of faith and to radically change America into something the Founding Fathers never intended.

Despite outstanding efforts by many Christians, our Founders saw that there was limited unity and no common strategy. There was also no organized method to recruit and train attorneys to defend our God-given constitutionally protected rights in modern legal challenges. And inadequate funding allowed much territory to be lost by default.

What does Alliance Defending Freedom do?

Alliance Defending Freedom advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith. As an alliance-building legal organization, we unite attorneys, ministry leaders, pastors, and like-minded organizations in a common purpose, a shared commitment to defending religious liberty, the sanctity of life, and marriage and family.

What is your mission statement?
To keep the doors open for the Gospel by advocating for religious liberty, the sanctity of life, and marriage and family.
Alliance Defending Religious Freedom

And they/their leadership fights to protect/support the legality of throwing people into prison for the crime of being LGBT.

Is that religious freedom? Sounds like Saudi Arabia or Iran. But then again, there are links between the World Congress of Families, of which the ADF has been (and probably still is) linked to and Iran and Saudi Arabia.

---

So, do you think that advocating the legality of throwing people into jailcamps for the 'crime' of existing is hateful?

How many years, do you personally, think I should get in prison for being Gay? Or should I just be grabbed off the street and executed, like what is going on right now in Putin's Russia.

At no point have you even attempted to rebut my claims of ADF's/Its leaders' advocacy. Do you think that advocacy is hateful?
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2017 11:40 AM by Tom in Lazybrook.)
07-15-2017 11:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCGrad1992 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,169
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 730
I Root For: Cincy Bearcats
Location: North Carolina
Post: #23
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-15-2017 11:34 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  And they/their leadership fights to protect/support the legality of throwing people into prison for the crime of being LGBT.

Is that religious freedom? Sounds like Saudi Arabia or Iran. But then again, there are links between the World Congress of Families, of which the ADF has been (and probably still is) linked to and Iran and Saudi Arabia.

---

So, do you think that advocating the legality of throwing people into jailcamps for the 'crime' of existing is hateful?

How many years, do you personally, think I should get in prison for being Gay? Or should I just be grabbed off the street and executed, like what is going on right now in Putin's Russia.

I'm still waiting for you to produce a direct source or quote that this group advocates putting homosexuals in jail camps. You can't so I will end this charade on your part. This is why you are hurting your precious cause because like so many on the left you rely on inflammatory, fear mongering, finger pointing, victim card playing as part of your M.O. It is not a good strategy for success BTW.
07-15-2017 11:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,147
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 438
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #24
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-15-2017 11:46 AM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 11:34 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  And they/their leadership fights to protect/support the legality of throwing people into prison for the crime of being LGBT.

Is that religious freedom? Sounds like Saudi Arabia or Iran. But then again, there are links between the World Congress of Families, of which the ADF has been (and probably still is) linked to and Iran and Saudi Arabia.

---

So, do you think that advocating the legality of throwing people into jailcamps for the 'crime' of existing is hateful?

How many years, do you personally, think I should get in prison for being Gay? Or should I just be grabbed off the street and executed, like what is going on right now in Putin's Russia.

I'm still waiting for you to produce a direct source or quote that this group advocates putting homosexuals in jail camps. You can't so I will end this charade on your part. This is why you are hurting your precious cause because like so many on the left you rely on inflammatory, fear mongering, finger pointing, victim card playing as part of your M.O. It is not a good strategy for success BTW.

I provided direct quotes. You refused to rebut them. Why not just ask the ADF..."Did your leaders say that about the Indian Court Ruling?" Or "Do you affiliate with the World Congress of Families".

I can promise you, the ADF knows exactly where I lifted those quotes from. They're free to sue them. Have they even attempted to deny that they're not supporting the legality of criminalization of persons, solely for being sexually active Gay people?

I also provided a reference to an amicus brief in Lawrence v Texas. Why not look that up yourself and see if it matches the quote provided?

You got nothing. And neither does the ADF. They can sue me, ABC News, or any number of people saying/reporting that the ADF is a 'hate group' if they'd like. Discovery will be a real *****.

In short, you asked for sources. I provided them. You just don't like that you can't attack the reporter of the quotes rather than the content of the quotes. You have no intention of debating the reasons behind the ADF's classification as a hate group, but rather wish to attack the group making those claims. I'm not playing your game.
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2017 12:04 PM by Tom in Lazybrook.)
07-15-2017 11:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cb4029 Offline
The spoon that stirs the pot.
*

Posts: 16,857
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 318
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham

Donators
Post: #25
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
Yep, hate group.
07-15-2017 11:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,147
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 438
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #26
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate Group"
Here's more on the ADF's advocacy of criminalization.

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2014/1...ake/201629

Feel free to rebut the CLAIMS in the article, but not the article itself.
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2017 12:10 PM by Tom in Lazybrook.)
07-15-2017 12:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kronke Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,517
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 1008
I Root For: Houston / AAC
Location: Texas
Post: #27
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate Group"
ADF's Statement. My money is on ABC retracting.

Quote:The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel and Director of Communications Kerri Kupec regarding ABC News’ abandonment of objectivity in repeating false accusations against ADF made by the ultra-partisan Southern Poverty Law Center:

“ABC News has committed journalistic malpractice. For ABC News to essentially cut and paste false charges against Alliance Defending Freedom by a radically left-wing, violence-inciting organization like Southern Poverty Law Center is a discredit to ABC News and to the profession. Americans’ trust in media is cratering, and the blatant bias and lack of professionalism that ABC attempted to pass off as news can only serve to confirm and intensify that distrust.

“Alliance Defending Freedom is one of the most respected and successful Supreme Court advocates in the legal profession, having won seven cases at the high court in the last seven years. Southern Poverty Law Center spends its time and money attacking veterans, nuns, Muslims who oppose terrorism, Catholics, Evangelicals, and anyone else who dares disagree with its far-left ideology. Meanwhile, ADF works every day to preserve and affirm free speech and the free exercise of religion for people from all walks of life and all backgrounds because we believe freedom is for everyone.

“For the sake of its own integrity, ABC News should issue an apology to Alliance Defending Freedom and retract the defamatory story it published Wednesday.”

http://adflegal.org/detailspages/press-r...ue-apology
07-15-2017 12:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,147
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 438
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #28
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-15-2017 12:19 PM)Kronke Wrote:  ADF's Statement. My money is on ABC retracting.

Quote:The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel and Director of Communications Kerri Kupec regarding ABC News’ abandonment of objectivity in repeating false accusations against ADF made by the ultra-partisan Southern Poverty Law Center:

“ABC News has committed journalistic malpractice. For ABC News to essentially cut and paste false charges against Alliance Defending Freedom by a radically left-wing, violence-inciting organization like Southern Poverty Law Center is a discredit to ABC News and to the profession. Americans’ trust in media is cratering, and the blatant bias and lack of professionalism that ABC attempted to pass off as news can only serve to confirm and intensify that distrust.

“Alliance Defending Freedom is one of the most respected and successful Supreme Court advocates in the legal profession, having won seven cases at the high court in the last seven years. Southern Poverty Law Center spends its time and money attacking veterans, nuns, Muslims who oppose terrorism, Catholics, Evangelicals, and anyone else who dares disagree with its far-left ideology. Meanwhile, ADF works every day to preserve and affirm free speech and the free exercise of religion for people from all walks of life and all backgrounds because we believe freedom is for everyone.

“For the sake of its own integrity, ABC News should issue an apology to Alliance Defending Freedom and retract the defamatory story it published Wednesday.”

http://adflegal.org/detailspages/press-r...ue-apology

I missed the part about them denying their leaders' comments regarding the India Supreme Court decisions, their recanting of their opposition to the legalization of being Gay in Lawrence v Texas, their denial of their advocacy for criminalization of being gay in Jamaica, Belize, and other countries, their denial of association with the World Congress of Families and their clear disavowal of their support for criminalization statutes.

Again, they're welcome to sue ABC for defamation or libel.

Where did they even deny any of the charges that caused them to be called a hate group?

---

What's your limit on criminal statues for LGBT persons? You down with execution like in Russia today? Or how about 5 years like in India? How about the 20 people currently in jail in Cameroon? Just curious as to whether you think the open defense of laws used for the purpose of jailing people or even executing them simply because they are LGBT constitutes hate.

Simply reporting their statements and activities does not constitute defamation. Its called reporting the facts. I wouldn't hold my breath on any retraction. I'll bet that ABC has invited them to come into their studios to discuss their statements and advocacy on camera.
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2017 01:56 PM by Tom in Lazybrook.)
07-15-2017 12:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,614
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 869
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #29
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate Group"
ABC news has no integrity to compromise.

The SPLC has zero credibility outside the extreme left. It's a scam organization.
07-15-2017 05:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,147
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 438
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #30
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-15-2017 05:27 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  ABC news has no integrity to compromise.

The SPLC has zero credibility outside the extreme left. It's a scam organization.

Yea, fighting the Klan is a scam. Correctly pointing out that the ADF and/or its leaders openly and consistently advocate for the criminalization of people for being Gay is a scam.

What's the limit on criminal penalties for being Gay that you think goes too far? I think I know that answer.

---

But of course, you refuse to challenge any of the charges that caused people to call the ADF a hate group in the first place.
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2017 06:34 PM by Tom in Lazybrook.)
07-15-2017 06:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BlazerFan11 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,207
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 361
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #31
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate Group"
(07-15-2017 11:31 AM)john01992 Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 03:57 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 12:21 AM)john01992 Wrote:  
(07-14-2017 11:10 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  johnnyzero, you are so utterly clueless and hypocritical that you don't even realize how much this also applies to you and others on the left with the "17 intelligence agencies" lie and other baseless Manchurian candidate conspiracy theories. Instead of admitting you were wrong, you tried to spin it as "4/17 is the same as 17/17" and never even addressed that the spokesmen and spokeswomen of those agencies were proven liars who produced zero evidence to support their claims, even though you continue to criticize conservative's sources on here for prior lies or distortions.

(07-14-2017 07:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  the entire left-wing media pushed a false story that was disproven by a basic google search. there was never any evidence to support it, but they were dealing with a story detrimental to the liberal cause so something needed to be done to give liberals the moral high ground on said story. so a completely BS story was presented as factual and believed by conservatives simply because the liberals needed it to be true.

59% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote totals

http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cum...Report.pdf

what are you talking about? who are the dems that have advocated the notion that Russia directly hacked the election vote results? in the months after the election that was never stated by a notable dem nor did a major media source ever make that claim. the only time such a notion was ever brought up in the MSM was when REPUBLICANS said it. They figured they could discredit the libs if they (falsely) accused the libs of claiming it was about hacking vote totals because that is a ridiculous notion that is clearly false.

it wasn't even until June that anything even closely resembling the possibility of impacting votes directly was brought up in the russian scandal. and that was over reports of russia might have tried to hack/remove voters from the voter rolls. but that postdates all the time from after the election to last month when this story was covered on an almost daily basis and your own poll.

speaking of which your poll is pretty crap. The only places it has been published are reddit, twitter, some no-name websites, and dailycaller. not fox news let alone abc, cbs, etc. why? because it's not newsworthy at all nor is it being taken seriously.

I guess you fell for the republicans BS hook, line, and sinker.

^^Another great example. You don't like the poll results because it makes Dems look like idiots, so it's crap. I guess The Economist and YouGov are part of the giant Russian conspiracy in your mind. So you think the mainstream outlets would focus on a poll that highlights how their ridiculous coverage has caused people to believe something that isn't real? Just Google "Russia election hacking" and see the results. Time, NYT, and CNN were the first three media outlets that showed up, using "election hacking" or a similar phrase. The NYT even has an entire section dedicated to it. I'm sure you'll just try to discredit the source like you always do, but here is a good article on media manipulation.

https://extranewsfeed.com/poll-mass-medi...cd0e7e9d17

more like I see a glaring red flag when your poll results are only be taken seriously by dailycaller and some no name website. I see that same line of questioning also showing republicans polling far higher than dems on anti-vaxers, shows an even higher percentage of republicans believe millions of illegals voted in the election* than the 59%** of dems who believe in hacked election vote totals. not to mention your argument falls to **** when you see how many cons believe in pizzagate. seriously: a republican trying to claim the dems are more vulnerable to conspiracy theories is like starting a landwar with Russia in winter.

*there are multiple spin room conservatives who believe this very conspiracy theory so you can't deny it's popularity.

**from what I can tell that poll asks the same question at multiple intervals since the election with the results being far lower than that 59% figure. It appears Daily Caller was selective and took the highest result which is prime example #1 of why I am not taking this seriously.

prime example #2 is that republicans believe conspiracy theories and push that towards actual policy. is there not a major voting commission whose existence republicans support that is based entirely on a debunked conspiracy theory that illegals are responsible for trump losing the PV? did we not see a pizzashop get shot up over pizzagate and had controversy in the cabinet confirmation process when the son of a nominee tweeted out pizzagate?

any notion of the dems promote this conspiracy theory as policy is unfounded. as I said the only time I have ever seen it brought up has been by a REPUBLICAN which is ironic as I would love to see you explain why you were the only to mention it rather than myself, tom, red, or mach.

and I have the basic news literacy to understand that "russian election hacking" does not automatically mean hacked vote totals in a headline. you read a headline and come up with a completely different conclusion.

and non of this refutes my original point. The OP calls CNN/ABC "fake news" while promoting debunked news stories and you don't have a response to that. you have nothing but a sidetrack because it is such a killer point that you and kronke wouldn't be working so hard to not address it. so let's go back to the very point I made in the OP that you never addressed (because you can't).

how can someone who got burned twice in one week by false right-wing media stories argue in good faith or good conscience that CNN/ABC is fake news?

So many problems with this, it's hard to even know where to begin.

First off, the mainstream outlets aren't exactly experts on polls, are they? Or do you live in a parallel universe where Hillary won in a landslide, like their polls said she would? Do you really expect them to report on things that further undermine their credibility? You are doing the exact same thing that you are criticizing Kronke for doing. How can you hold up the mainstream outlets as the golden standard when they have been caught faking news (RUSSIA HACKS US ELECTRICAL GRID!!!)? You try to bolster your argument by anecdotally bringing up a few people on here who believe in PizzaGate while dismissing a scientific poll just because you didn't like the result. "Election hacking" clearly implies that the election itself was tampered with, which is precisely why do many Democrats now believe that. You see that verbiage prominently on mainstream sites because that is the narrative they want people to believe. They could easily clear it up, but they choose not to. Instead, they go around talking about "election hacking" as if it is a proven fact, when the truth is that Russia *might* have hacked the DNC, although there has been absolutely no credible evidence of that made public. Yet, Democrats go around parroting that and truly believe lies such as "17 intelligence agencies" lie (fromwhich originated from James Clapper, a guy who literally committed perjury on national television and has even since himself admitted it was false) You and them are just two different sides of the same dirty coin. You, Mach, cb, etc. are no better than the PizzaGaters or birthers, so stop acting like it.
07-16-2017 01:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kronke Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,517
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 1008
I Root For: Houston / AAC
Location: Texas
Post: #32
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-15-2017 12:59 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  What's your limit on criminal statues for LGBT persons? You down with execution like in Russia today?

Debunked fake news. You must have missed this..

http://csnbbs.com/thread-815044-post-144...id14405936

(06-19-2017 07:51 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Vice News report finds no evidence of this being true.


(This post was last modified: 07-16-2017 02:13 AM by Kronke.)
07-16-2017 02:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_Is_Back Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,056
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 541
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
Post: #33
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-14-2017 07:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  ....

So not addressing this then?
07-16-2017 09:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_Is_Back Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,056
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 541
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
Post: #34
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-15-2017 10:22 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  What should be the limit for criminal penalties for being Gay? Execution? 50 years of torture in jail? Where does the ADF draw the line? I don't see any line drawn.

I believe they should be identical to the penalties for not baking a cake for a gay wedding.... Maybe if we tie those two things together we can move on.
07-16-2017 09:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,147
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 438
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #35
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-16-2017 09:28 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 10:22 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  What should be the limit for criminal penalties for being Gay? Execution? 50 years of torture in jail? Where does the ADF draw the line? I don't see any line drawn.

I believe they should be identical to the penalties for not baking a cake for a gay wedding.... Maybe if we tie those two things together we can move on.

LOL. So in order for you to oppose jailings, beatings, and even execution for being Gay, LGBT persons have to accept being discriminated against in public commerce?

I don't think that's a deal. Because that would encourage the anti-Gays to engage in more violence against LGBT persons so they can use it as leverage.

What you are proposing is little different IMHO from Southerners in the 60's offering to investigate and punish lynchings if Black people stop attempting to secure equal rights in the 1960s.

Either you're for executions and jailings or you're not. Make your choice.
(This post was last modified: 07-16-2017 10:50 AM by Tom in Lazybrook.)
07-16-2017 10:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,147
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 438
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #36
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-16-2017 02:11 AM)Kronke Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 12:59 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  What's your limit on criminal statues for LGBT persons? You down with execution like in Russia today?

Debunked fake news. You must have missed this..

http://csnbbs.com/thread-815044-post-144...id14405936

(06-19-2017 07:51 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Vice News report finds no evidence of this being true.



Its not fake news. Over 100 missing. Over 27 dead. Multiple sources. Of course, no one will go on camera because the Russians will kill anyone who comes forward.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_concen...n_Chechnya 95 sources in the Wikipedia article.

BTW, the first Concentration Camp in Argun was demolished before the Vice News team arrived. Why did they bulldoze it?
(This post was last modified: 07-16-2017 10:48 AM by Tom in Lazybrook.)
07-16-2017 10:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 20,492
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 582
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #37
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-16-2017 10:45 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 09:28 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 10:22 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  What should be the limit for criminal penalties for being Gay? Execution? 50 years of torture in jail? Where does the ADF draw the line? I don't see any line drawn.

I believe they should be identical to the penalties for not baking a cake for a gay wedding.... Maybe if we tie those two things together we can move on.

LOL. So in order for you to oppose jailings, beatings, and even execution for being Gay, LGBT persons have to accept being discriminated against in public commerce?

I don't think that's a deal. Because that would encourage the anti-Gays to engage in more violence against LGBT persons so they can use it as leverage.

What you are proposing is little different IMHO from Southerners in the 60's offering to investigate and punish lynchings if Black people stop attempting to secure equal rights in the 1960s.

Either you're for executions and jailings or you're not. Make your choice.

Comprehension. Get you some.
07-16-2017 10:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ericsrevenge76 Away
Lion and the Lamb
*

Posts: 11,649
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 663
I Root For: The Kingdom
Location: The Body of Christ
Post: #38
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-16-2017 10:45 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 09:28 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 10:22 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  What should be the limit for criminal penalties for being Gay? Execution? 50 years of torture in jail? Where does the ADF draw the line? I don't see any line drawn.

I believe they should be identical to the penalties for not baking a cake for a gay wedding.... Maybe if we tie those two things together we can move on.

LOL. So in order for you to oppose jailings, beatings, and even execution for being Gay, LGBT persons have to accept being discriminated against in public commerce?

I don't think that's a deal. Because that would encourage the anti-Gays to engage in more violence against LGBT persons so they can use it as leverage.

What you are proposing is little different IMHO from Southerners in the 60's offering to investigate and punish lynchings if Black people stop attempting to secure equal rights in the 1960s.

Either you're for executions and jailings or you're not. Make your choice.



Posts and discussions like this verify your depravity and insanity.

Woe is you on judgement day my poor friend.
(This post was last modified: 07-16-2017 11:05 AM by ericsrevenge76.)
07-16-2017 11:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,147
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 438
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #39
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-16-2017 11:03 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 10:45 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 09:28 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 10:22 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  What should be the limit for criminal penalties for being Gay? Execution? 50 years of torture in jail? Where does the ADF draw the line? I don't see any line drawn.

I believe they should be identical to the penalties for not baking a cake for a gay wedding.... Maybe if we tie those two things together we can move on.

LOL. So in order for you to oppose jailings, beatings, and even execution for being Gay, LGBT persons have to accept being discriminated against in public commerce?

I don't think that's a deal. Because that would encourage the anti-Gays to engage in more violence against LGBT persons so they can use it as leverage.

What you are proposing is little different IMHO from Southerners in the 60's offering to investigate and punish lynchings if Black people stop attempting to secure equal rights in the 1960s.

Either you're for executions and jailings or you're not. Make your choice.



Posts and discussions like this verify your depravity and insanity on these issues.

Woe is you on judgement day my poor friend.

Does Jesus support throwing Gay people into jail for existing? How about rounding them up and killing them like in Russia? Just curious about your "Christianity".
07-16-2017 11:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ericsrevenge76 Away
Lion and the Lamb
*

Posts: 11,649
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 663
I Root For: The Kingdom
Location: The Body of Christ
Post: #40
RE: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate...
(07-16-2017 11:06 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  
Does Jesus support throwing Gay people into jail for existing?
How about rounding them up and killing them like in Russia? Just curious about your "Christianity".



No, and neither do a vast majority of Americans.

This is only a threat in your twisted imagination.

Gays are actually being mass murdered simply for being gay in other parts of the world, and they don't have governmental protection like you have here.

People like me are happy to live in peace with you. What you do in your bedroom is your business.
(This post was last modified: 07-16-2017 11:20 AM by ericsrevenge76.)
07-16-2017 11:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.