(04-11-2017 01:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It is mental that 86% of the time Republicans are blind idiots. The vast vast vast majority just blindly follow the R by the name. They can't think critically. They can't think for themselves for the most part.

In fairness Mach, the D's aren't much better, if at all.

(04-11-2017 02:06 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 01:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 01:40 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 09:09 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 09:07 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  MUH POLLS!!!

At one point saying that was just a funny way of dismissing an argument.

Today, it's an argument of equal intellectual status.

The left has lost it.

It's mental.

According to search of this site, this is like the 39th time you've said this same thing. We get it.

lol, I think it's hilarious you actually searched for that. I keep posting it because it's true. Dems have gone bat sh!t crazy since the election. You guys have NOTHING on the folks bagging on Obama the last eight years. There is no comparison and this is coming from someone that does not even like Trump.

It took me 2 minutes...so don't flatter yourself too much.

And regardless if it's true or not, we don't need quite this much spam on it do we?

(04-11-2017 02:21 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 01:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The scary part was Spicer yesterday mentioning like 3 times how "Well received" this action was. Sure makes it sound like it was done to change a narrative instead of doing what was right.

Depends on who he was referring to if that's what he mentioned Tom.

There are some Republicans in Congress how have supported this type of action for a while (Graham, McCain, and a few others). So if that's who he was referring to, then then statement makes sense.

He was talking about the calls and messages received from others like Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi (I think) and a number of others. They see this entire thing as the cancer it is, and a lot of them know it could only take one spark in their own neck of the woods and...

(04-11-2017 11:18 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

Quote:Beta Cuck Barry never bombed Assad or any of his airports. Do you not understand this.

Neither did the orange haired buffoon. Obviously you don't understand it either.

(04-11-2017 01:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It is mental that 86% of the time Republicans are blind idiots. The vast vast vast majority just blindly follow the R by the name. They can't think critically. They can't think for themselves for the most part.

you have a link for that?

http://obamamessiah.blogspot.com/
IS BARACK OBAMA THE MESSIAH?



Barbara Walters admitted on a broadcast appearance with Piers Morgan that maybe Christmas wasn’t the time to say it, but it’s true – the media regarded President Obama as the “next messiah” because of his promises and policies.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013...as-next-m/

Is Obama a (or the) Messiah?
https://www.onfaith.co/onfaith/2008/02/1...ssiah/6401

nine pages to tell Mach. what he never wants to hear.

FWIW - The argument about pages is meaningless. You can change the settings to display 50 posts per page instead of 10. Therefore, I'm still on my second page.

(04-11-2017 11:13 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I think you guys are brainwashed. You could have the exact same policy and if a D is after the name you won't support it. Put an R next to the name and it's 86% will. The vast majority don't think for themselves obviously. Wait til Rush and FoxNews tells you how to feel. Those stats prove it.

Total BS. This hasn't happened for any "exact same policy." That's the problem with the left. You keep insisting that things are the same when they are not.

Things like the exchanges or the mandate as parts of Obamacare. Those were not "the exact same" things that republicans had previously supported. And it was the changes to those things, plus the other 2000 pages that went with them, that were the reasons why republicans didn't support them in Obamacare.

Same thing here. These attacks were different, and for a different purpose, than the ones under Obama.

For the record, I don't support either one, because I don't believe in fighting a war that we don't intend to win, and I don't think we even know whom we want to win in this one.

(04-11-2017 03:16 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  FWIW - The argument about pages is meaningless. You can change the settings to display 50 posts per page instead of 10. Therefore, I'm still on my second page.

Two loooong pages to tell Mach. what he never wants to hear.

Obama ? wasnt that a word used for Team over Country ?

(04-11-2017 09:06 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Andrew Kaczynski: New ABC poll shows how conservatives view everything by Team. Democrats: 37% support Trump's Syria strikes, 38% supported Obama doing it in 2013. GOP: 86% supported Trump doing it, but only 22% supported Obama doing it in 13.


Pathetic..................

Be prepared to be disappointed then. Because you'll be hearing it a...lot.

(04-11-2017 12:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 12:02 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

Quote:No, Lybia was a Hillary Clinton / Sydney Blumenthal operation.

Hannity??????

Knowing that poster...likely Infowars or WND or Breitbart. Nothing credible for certain.

Better than Slate, or Vox , or HuffPo, or PolitiFact.

(04-11-2017 01:08 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 01:03 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I took it from another board that is rock freaking solid. I didn't have to fact check the tweet because I know if this guy wrote it down you can take it to the bank. After all the shyt that is thrown around here not sourced I didn't think it would be a problem. I know it's right.

I found and posted the Poll. It really doesn't matter some cons here will spin it whether you have a link or not.

You didn't even get the point. The criticism is the comparison to that 2013 poll and what questions it asked which you didn't link.

(04-11-2017 01:30 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  PCM linked the poll boys. It's not fake.


Muh polls I don't agree with "FAKE"

Pathetic

As I said to him, he didn't link the 2013 poll you talked about nor the specific question asked then.

(04-11-2017 01:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It is mental that 86% of the time Republicans are blind idiots. The vast vast vast majority just blindly follow the R by the name. They can't think critically. They can't think for themselves for the most part.

Pot, kettle, Putin.

(04-11-2017 01:08 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 01:03 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I took it from another board that is rock freaking solid. I didn't have to fact check the tweet because I know if this guy wrote it down you can take it to the bank. After all the shyt that is thrown around here not sourced I didn't think it would be a problem. I know it's right.

I found and posted the Poll. It really doesn't matter some cons here will spin it whether you have a link or not.

Do you need some ointment?

(04-11-2017 01:30 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  PCM linked the poll boys. It's not fake.


Muh polls I don't agree with "FAKE"

Pathetic

Give pcm the ointment you use. He really needs it.

(04-11-2017 12:58 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 12:43 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 12:22 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:   google turns up nothing but this thread as the source.

http://bfy.tw/BAVt

Now that's f$%^ing funny.

The proofiness is right there in this poll!!!

I believe this is the Poll the OP was referring to.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...0285e527bd

The data in his post matches the data in the article. Maybe Andrew Kaczynski might of tweeted it out. I don't use twitter so I'm not sure. I don't know how any other reason as to how his name is attached since its not in the article.

P.S. Oh and I used google which led me directly to the article.

So, this is the poll that had Hillary winning by 11 points about 2 weeks from the election. So if we add corrections for their huge error factor, basically the poll becomes 60-31 in favor of Trumps actions. Sounds legit.

That's not how it works UofM but why am I not surprised you would come up with that.

(04-11-2017 05:23 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  That's not how it works UofM but why am I not surprised you would come up with that.

Maybe you and Max can get together and remind us all how polling works again. I know he says you have to factor in MUH FIELD OFFICES and other fake data points in order to make a poll legit. Also, I believe if you manipulate your calling patterns heavy enough, you can actually show that Hillary will win Georgia and Texas.