(03-20-2017 10:50 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 10:15 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  The longest lasting consequence of the donks pissing away the last election will be changes to the Supreme Court.

Thank god.

Bingo!

w/o question...

(03-20-2017 09:21 AM)Niner National Wrote:  If he needs 8 dem votes I see this carrying on for a long time.

that's fine. They can be bought for a small price, 2018 vs 30+ year control of the SC is a good deal for Trump.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Gorsuch is declining to answer Dem questions that pertain directly to past and possible future cases.

Good for him. He should do the same as Ginsberg/Sotomayer/Kagan and let the Dems blood pressure rise.

(03-21-2017 11:01 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  Gorsuch is declining to answer Dem questions that pertain directly to past and possible future cases.

Good for him. He should do the same as Ginsberg/Sotomayer/Kagan and let the Dems blood pressure rise.

he is under no obligation to answer hypothetical. I believe in a court room that would be objected to as "suppositions" (?).

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Gorsuch is phenomenal. Dems are going to look like idiots when this is over, and they try to paint him as Hitler.

considering how the libturds completely screwed up the hypothetical Sessions question, I wouldnt touch a hypothetical either.

(03-20-2017 10:50 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 10:15 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  The longest lasting consequence of the donks pissing away the last election will be changes to the Supreme Court.

Thank god.

Bingo!

If the Demoncrats don't want to cooperate then slam, wham them with the nuclear option. You can't tell me that if the shoe was on the other foot the Evil party wouldn't commit the nuclear option. If you say they wouldn't then you're just plain stupid and a big liar, yes liar.

This guy Gorsuch has an even keel and seems to be fair.

If it creates more animosity, can there be more? Shite, it seems our Congress is one punch away from total chaos anyway like third world countries where they try to settle it with a fight, a real fisticuffs fight.
So be it.

(03-21-2017 11:13 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Gorsuch is phenomenal. Dems are going to look like idiots when this is over, and they try to paint him as Hitler.

yes they are....and your former candidate might just be be the next one up to bat....

#watchithappen

(03-21-2017 11:36 AM)olliebaba Wrote:  If the Demoncrats don't want to cooperate then slam, wham them with the nuclear option. You can't tell me that if the shoe was on the other foot the Evil party wouldn't commit the nuclear option. If you say they wouldn't then you're just plain stupid and a big liar, yes liar.

From The Hill

Quote:Hillary Clinton's running mate is predicting Democrats will go "nuclear" if Republicans try to stonewall a potential Supreme Court nominee by Clinton.

Tim Kaine on Friday said he believes Senate Democrats will change the chamber's rules if they run into GOP obstruction in 2017.

"If these guys think they are going to stonewall the filling of that vacancy, or other vacancies, then a Democratic Senate majority will say we're not going to let you thwart the law," he told The Huffington Post.

(03-21-2017 11:45 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 11:36 AM)olliebaba Wrote:  If the Demoncrats don't want to cooperate then slam, wham them with the nuclear option. You can't tell me that if the shoe was on the other foot the Evil party wouldn't commit the nuclear option. If you say they wouldn't then you're just plain stupid and a big liar, yes liar.

From The Hill

Quote:Hillary Clinton's running mate is predicting Democrats will go "nuclear" if Republicans try to stonewall a potential Supreme Court nominee by Clinton.

Tim Kaine on Friday said he believes Senate Democrats will change the chamber's rules if they run into GOP obstruction in 2017.

"If these guys think they are going to stonewall the filling of that vacancy, or other vacancies, then a Democratic Senate majority will say we're not going to let you thwart the law," he told The Huffington Post.

once again, save it for the next one if necessary....right now they're screwed relative to popular opinion....

#betterstrategy

(03-21-2017 11:44 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  yes they are....and your former candidate might just be be the next one up to bat....

My wildest fantasy would have Trump nominating Cruz to replace Ginsberg. That would be ****** epic.

(03-21-2017 11:48 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 11:44 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  yes they are....and your former candidate might just be be the next one up to bat....

My wildest fantasy would have Trump nominating Cruz to replace Ginsberg. That would be ****** epic.

Wouldn't that be GRAND?

...now we know Senator Durbin is an idiot....

Trying to tie Gorsuch to one of his professors 25 years ago?

bahahahahaha

(03-21-2017 11:52 AM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 11:48 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 11:44 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  yes they are....and your former candidate might just be be the next one up to bat....

My wildest fantasy would have Trump nominating Cruz to replace Ginsberg. That would be ****** epic.

Wouldn't that be GRAND?

yes, it would....

(03-21-2017 11:59 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Trying to tie Gorsuch to one of his professors 25 years ago?

bahahahahaha

dipshite durbin is cherry pickin like the libs that post on this board....east StL....

who'd a thunk it?

(03-21-2017 11:58 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  ...now we know Senator Durbin is an idiot....

I'm pretty sure you knew before NOW.

(03-21-2017 11:48 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 11:44 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  yes they are....and your former candidate might just be be the next one up to bat....

My wildest fantasy would have Trump nominating Cruz to replace Ginsberg. That would be ****** epic.

Cruz might not get half the Republican Senators as much as they dislike him!

(03-21-2017 12:17 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 11:48 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 11:44 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  yes they are....and your former candidate might just be be the next one up to bat....

My wildest fantasy would have Trump nominating Cruz to replace Ginsberg. That would be ****** epic.

Cruz might not get half the Republican Senators as much as they dislike him!

The ones that don't like him would be guaranteed "yes" votes so they could get rid of him.

(03-21-2017 12:17 PM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 11:58 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  ...now we know Senator Durbin is an idiot....

I'm pretty sure you knew before NOW.

sometimes, a 15 yrd targeting penalty is necessary