(03-04-2017 03:43 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-04-2017 03:38 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Sam Stein: We’re a bit numb. But the president read a Brietbart article, didn’t consult advisers, and accused his predecessor of wiretapping him. crazy*

Barrack Milhous Obama

1.illegally wiretap
2. Use IRS to attack enemies
3. Routinely lie about Foreign Pol
4. Politicize Intel

Lol

5. Slush fund

(03-04-2017 03:38 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Sam Stein: We’re a bit numb. But the president read a Brietbart article, didn’t consult advisers, and accused his predecessor of wiretapping him. crazy*

So you are quoting a Huffington Post writer's tweet to us? Are they numb because some Obama officials may go to jail if true?

Seriously Mach-the reaction of a Huffington Post writer? Why not just give us your own reaction? You have far more credibility.

(03-04-2017 04:52 PM)bullet Wrote:  Seriously Mach-the reaction of a Huffington Post writer? Why not just give us your own reaction? You have far more credibility.

Trump is a genius.

The Guardian has reported that the FBI applied for a Foreign Intelligence Service Act (FISA) warrant last summer to monitor members of the Trump campaign, but was denied in its initial attempt. Last November, former British MP and openly anti-Trump journalist Louise Mensch reported that the FBI had succeeded in its second request for a FISA warrant, which was later confirmed by the BBC.
http://fortune.com/2017/03/04/trump-wiretappi...

According to the New York Times (based on FBI sources), the FBI initially determined that the Trump Tower server did not have “any nefarious purpose.” But then, Heat Street says,“the FBI’s counter-intelligence arm, sources say, re-drew an earlier FISA court request around possible financial and banking offenses related to the server.”

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443768/...

Reading the purpose of the FISA, this seems like a gross abuse of its purpose.

(03-04-2017 04:58 PM)bullet Wrote:  Reading the purpose of the FISA, this seems like a gross abuse of its purpose.

Like the irs, like the ap, like the slush fund, like dhs "scanning" georgia, etc.

Arrogant abuse of power.

(03-04-2017 12:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I would expect them to Tap his phones. It would be derelict if they didn't.

???????

Your are advocating for the federal government to tap a private citizen's phones?

So instead of tricky Dick Nixon, can we begin to call Trump conny Don? They will both end up the same way, that's for sure.

I guess the libturds are now admitting that Obama likely had Trump wire-tapped. I mean, when you have to send out Ben Rhodes, the liar who came up with the fake talking points for Benghazi, you know they are laying WAYYYYYYY low.

Now they just need to come up with legitimate sounding reasons why they needed to go full watergate.

If, Trump had been wiretapped, and had "colluded" with the Russians as Mach keeps parroting, don't you think that it would have been used during the campaign to destroy the Trump candidacy?

This is going to blow up, and Obama and his minions are going to get torched.

I love it.

You have to be half retarded to believe this is some Russian thing--considering who is harping on it about on this forum that rings true.

I want to see a weekly perp walk on the news. At least weekly. We might need to start off at a one a day pace for a while.

Haul Out the Holly!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeS8bkoYfDI

(03-04-2017 05:15 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  If, Trump had been wiretapped, and had "colluded" with the Russians as Mach keeps parroting, don't you think that it would have been used during the campaign to destroy the Trump candidacy?

Of course, which makes it so bad that they found NOTHING.

(03-04-2017 05:32 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-04-2017 05:15 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  If, Trump had been wiretapped, and had "colluded" with the Russians as Mach keeps parroting, don't you think that it would have been used during the campaign to destroy the Trump candidacy?

Of course, which makes it so bad that they found NOTHING.

According to board libs. They did we're all too blind to see it. Apparently this is some Joseph Smith level sh*t

(03-04-2017 05:34 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-04-2017 05:32 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(03-04-2017 05:15 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  If, Trump had been wiretapped, and had "colluded" with the Russians as Mach keeps parroting, don't you think that it would have been used during the campaign to destroy the Trump candidacy?

Of course, which makes it so bad that they found NOTHING.

According to board libs. They did we're all too blind to see it. Apparently this is some Joseph Smith level sh*t

OMG it isn't the Russians it is the Brits oh no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

King Ralph tweets and you guys are so close to his nutsack 14 pages in half a day. Then you have the nerve to say lock him up lock him up. Crazy.

The story is not true. Breitbart have been known to report false conspiracy stories, and Trump is too stupid enough to know he have been made like an idiot several times.