Welp.

(11-05-2016 02:42 PM)timber Wrote:  I feel for y'all, this was another right team right time game just like GT, UGA, NC ST, and UF. Hard fought game against a clearly ailing Ole Miss and you took out their QB. Silver lining, you could be us with no chance of a bowl.

Yea seems every one of those games was a geme.

(11-05-2016 03:00 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  

(11-05-2016 02:37 PM)Oldyeller Wrote:  Let's take a look at our history. We hire Mike Sewak who lands us in academic crapsville and lays an embarrassing egg in the playoffs. We hire "superstar" Vanwhatever to mix it up, then hire Hatch to fix it and continue to correct the nightmare. Hach takes us to seven wins and a Payton award winner by going backwards. He has two years to give it a go and butts heads with Baker and is out. Same scenario unfolds with the next three hires while Ga Tech is getting skull drug by North Carolina. Let's hire 80 year old Mike Ayers and call it a day.

What is your point, here? That we've made awful hires in the past so it's okay to continue to make awful hires?

I'm tired of chasing rabbits with the T/O. Clearly the reason you feel we made a bad hire.

(11-05-2016 03:13 PM)Oldyeller Wrote:  I'm tired of chasing rabbits with the T/O. Clearly the reason you feel we made a bad hire.

Uhhhh, no.

(11-05-2016 03:13 PM)Oldyeller Wrote:  

(11-05-2016 03:00 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  

(11-05-2016 02:37 PM)Oldyeller Wrote:  Let's take a look at our history. We hire Mike Sewak who lands us in academic crapsville and lays an embarrassing egg in the playoffs. We hire "superstar" Vanwhatever to mix it up, then hire Hatch to fix it and continue to correct the nightmare. Hach takes us to seven wins and a Payton award winner by going backwards. He has two years to give it a go and butts heads with Baker and is out. Same scenario unfolds with the next three hires while Ga Tech is getting skull drug by North Carolina. Let's hire 80 year old Mike Ayers and call it a day.

What is your point, here? That we've made awful hires in the past so it's okay to continue to make awful hires?

I'm tired of chasing rabbits with the T/O. Clearly the reason you feel we made a bad hire.

Tough loss. Much better than I was expecting. One of those rare chances to play a down Sec team. Hate that we couldnt finish the drill.

Gives me hope that we might not lose out, like I've been thinking we would.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

(11-06-2016 01:09 PM)DrGonzo Wrote:  Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

Your defense was good enough to get us to switch playcallers.

(11-06-2016 01:09 PM)DrGonzo Wrote:  Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

I don't think ANYONE has said that. Clearly hyperbole on your part so you can talk more trash when they perform well. That said, one has to wonder if they knew what to expect against Southern. I think it was a good move for GS for sure, but can they keep it up now that everyone has tape on what they do?

APP has a very good defense, but you can't base it on a game with a P5 opponent, a new playcaller, and an Ole Miss defense that is trash to begin with. The only reason Ole Miss has been in games this year is because of their QB. They are legitimately one of the worst defenses on the country and certainly the worst in the SEC.

(11-06-2016 01:18 PM)Klak Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:09 PM)DrGonzo Wrote:  Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

Your defense was good enough to get us to switch playcallers.

Yes.

The offensive attack we saw in Oxford yesterday was fundamentally different than anything we did against App or at any point this season.

App does have a good defense, no doubt. We made them look like the 85 Bears though, and they damn sure ain't that good.

(11-06-2016 02:08 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:09 PM)DrGonzo Wrote:  Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

I don't think ANYONE has said that. Clearly hyperbole on your part so you can talk more trash when they perform well. That said, one has to wonder if they knew what to expect against Southern. I think it was a good move for GS for sure, but can they keep it up now that everyone has tape on what they do?

APP has a very good defense, but you can't base it on a game with a P5 opponent, a new playcaller, and an Ole Miss defense that is trash to begin with. The only reason Ole Miss has been in games this year is because of their QB. They are legitimately one of the worst defenses on the country and certainly the worst in the SEC.

Well... it is his MO.

I spoke with a GaSo booster/important person yesterday after the game, in Oxford. He said that your coach and AD are about gone. Said that the usual hiring process at GaSo was a five person decision, this time the AD didn't honor the process and hired without that panel. He said he told the AD if his hire didn't work out that they wouldn't be looking to hire one new guy, they would be looking for two guys.

The money at GaSo is not happy, and out thinking yourself with an onside kick will get you out of Statesboro.

(11-06-2016 05:28 PM)Usajags Wrote:  I spoke with a GaSo booster/important person yesterday after the game, in Oxford. He said that your coach and AD are about gone. Said that the usual hiring process at GaSo was a five person decision, this time the AD didn't honor the process and hired without that panel. He said he told the AD if his hire didn't work out that they wouldn't be looking to hire one new guy, they would be looking for two guys.

The money at GaSo is not happy, and out thinking yourself with an onside kick will get you out of Statesboro.

Not sure it would be a smart idea to get rid of the AD that has presided over the best growth in the Athletic Foundation and season ticket sales we have seen in a very long time and make a good hire when we lost our coach the off-season before our first year with an FBS schedule ever.

Also, this is the first time I've heard someone say TK wanted CTS and the hiring committee someone else. Not saying I have any reason to believe you aren't reporting exactly what you were told. No one wants to claim the disaster I guess.

(11-06-2016 05:28 PM)Usajags Wrote:  I spoke with a GaSo booster/important person yesterday after the game, in Oxford. He said that your coach and AD are about gone. Said that the usual hiring process at GaSo was a five person decision, this time the AD didn't honor the process and hired without that panel. He said he told the AD if his hire didn't work out that they wouldn't be looking to hire one new guy, they would be looking for two guys.

The money at GaSo is not happy, and out thinking yourself with an onside kick will get you out of Statesboro.

Well that's the last time I give you inside information.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

(11-06-2016 04:49 PM)TheEagleWay Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 02:08 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:09 PM)DrGonzo Wrote:  Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

I don't think ANYONE has said that. Clearly hyperbole on your part so you can talk more trash when they perform well. That said, one has to wonder if they knew what to expect against Southern. I think it was a good move for GS for sure, but can they keep it up now that everyone has tape on what they do?

APP has a very good defense, but you can't base it on a game with a P5 opponent, a new playcaller, and an Ole Miss defense that is trash to begin with. The only reason Ole Miss has been in games this year is because of their QB. They are legitimately one of the worst defenses on the country and certainly the worst in the SEC.

Well... it is his MO.

He does like to play the victim. Millennial's, they can't help it.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

(11-06-2016 07:40 PM)SBEagle Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 05:28 PM)Usajags Wrote:  I spoke with a GaSo booster/important person yesterday after the game, in Oxford. He said that your coach and AD are about gone. Said that the usual hiring process at GaSo was a five person decision, this time the AD didn't honor the process and hired without that panel. He said he told the AD if his hire didn't work out that they wouldn't be looking to hire one new guy, they would be looking for two guys.

The money at GaSo is not happy, and out thinking yourself with an onside kick will get you out of Statesboro.

Well that's the last time I give you inside information.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

What are intrawebz message bards for if it isn't for sharing stolen inside information???

(11-06-2016 08:27 PM)Usajags Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 07:40 PM)SBEagle Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 05:28 PM)Usajags Wrote:  I spoke with a GaSo booster/important person yesterday after the game, in Oxford. He said that your coach and AD are about gone. Said that the usual hiring process at GaSo was a five person decision, this time the AD didn't honor the process and hired without that panel. He said he told the AD if his hire didn't work out that they wouldn't be looking to hire one new guy, they would be looking for two guys.

The money at GaSo is not happy, and out thinking yourself with an onside kick will get you out of Statesboro.

Well that's the last time I give you inside information.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

What are intrawebz message bards for if it isn't for sharing stolen inside information???

LOL

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

(11-06-2016 07:41 PM)SBEagle Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 04:49 PM)TheEagleWay Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 02:08 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:09 PM)DrGonzo Wrote:  Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

I don't think ANYONE has said that. Clearly hyperbole on your part so you can talk more trash when they perform well. That said, one has to wonder if they knew what to expect against Southern. I think it was a good move for GS for sure, but can they keep it up now that everyone has tape on what they do?

APP has a very good defense, but you can't base it on a game with a P5 opponent, a new playcaller, and an Ole Miss defense that is trash to begin with. The only reason Ole Miss has been in games this year is because of their QB. They are legitimately one of the worst defenses on the country and certainly the worst in the SEC.

Well... it is his MO.

He does like to play the victim. Millennial's, they can't help it.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Ever since the game the narrative has revolved around the sorry state of the GS offense.

And am I a millennial? I was born in 89.

(11-07-2016 07:51 AM)DrGonzo Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 07:41 PM)SBEagle Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 04:49 PM)TheEagleWay Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 02:08 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:09 PM)DrGonzo Wrote:  Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

I don't think ANYONE has said that. Clearly hyperbole on your part so you can talk more trash when they perform well. That said, one has to wonder if they knew what to expect against Southern. I think it was a good move for GS for sure, but can they keep it up now that everyone has tape on what they do?

APP has a very good defense, but you can't base it on a game with a P5 opponent, a new playcaller, and an Ole Miss defense that is trash to begin with. The only reason Ole Miss has been in games this year is because of their QB. They are legitimately one of the worst defenses on the country and certainly the worst in the SEC.

Well... it is his MO.

He does like to play the victim. Millennial's, they can't help it.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Ever since the game the narrative has revolved around the sorry state of the GS offense.

And am I a millennial? I was born in 89.

You're cherry picking what you want to hear. Nearly everyone has given credit to APP for a great defense. Time to stop peddling the "no one respects APP" BS and try something else.

(11-07-2016 07:51 AM)DrGonzo Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 07:41 PM)SBEagle Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 04:49 PM)TheEagleWay Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 02:08 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 01:09 PM)DrGonzo Wrote:  Hopefully this game put to rest the "App's defense isn't that good" talk.

My guess is it will not.

I don't think ANYONE has said that. Clearly hyperbole on your part so you can talk more trash when they perform well. That said, one has to wonder if they knew what to expect against Southern. I think it was a good move for GS for sure, but can they keep it up now that everyone has tape on what they do?

APP has a very good defense, but you can't base it on a game with a P5 opponent, a new playcaller, and an Ole Miss defense that is trash to begin with. The only reason Ole Miss has been in games this year is because of their QB. They are legitimately one of the worst defenses on the country and certainly the worst in the SEC.

Well... it is his MO.

He does like to play the victim. Millennial's, they can't help it.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Ever since the game the narrative has revolved around the sorry state of the GS offense.

And am I a millennial? I was born in 89.

Wrong, as usual. We've been talking about the state of Southern's awful offense for several weeks. Some even after the Sav St game. Everyone knows App's D is stout, how many times do you want us to repeat it to allow you to finally lose the martyr role?



Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk