Yeah he's not winning Michigan either.

kind of like Bernie wasnt winning Michigan either?

(10-28-2016 11:51 AM)Max Power Wrote:  Yeah he's not winning Michigan either.

But Clinton was beaten badly here in Minnesota by Bernie Sanders
-- minnesota.cbslocal.com

DON'T PRESS YOUR LUCK

(10-27-2016 12:38 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  MN will vote heavily blue. Probably WI as well.

Sorry.

Just asked my source, senior Trump official, if MN is indeed on battleground list: "It is now. We are winning this thing."
-- @JoshuaGreen (Bloomberg)

A PRAIRIE HOME COMPANION

(10-28-2016 10:33 AM)Max Power Wrote:  

(10-27-2016 10:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Heck Max admitted 6 weeks ago that was exactly what he was doing.

LOL where did I say that exactly? It's math that's demoralizing you, or at least should be. Don't blame me for reality's liberal bias. The delusion on here in the face of the asskicking Trump's getting in polls, betting markets, early voting results and forecasts is hilarious. You've got Trump losing in recent AZ polls but instead people on here are talking about MN going red! Minne-*******-sota! You know, the state that went for Mondale! You can either accept reality now and remember the lessons of 2012 or wait for reality to give you a nice big cockslap on November 8th.

Hillary's big lead in the polls cuts both ways though. It can lead to complacency on our side which can be just as bad. The net effect isn't much.

How about an active FBI investigation?



SURPRISE!

(10-28-2016 11:51 AM)Max Power Wrote:  Yeah he's not winning Michigan either.

Trump Comm. Advisor: Internals show dead heat in Michigan, New Mexico

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...ew-mexico/

(10-28-2016 07:32 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 10:33 AM)Max Power Wrote:  

(10-27-2016 10:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Heck Max admitted 6 weeks ago that was exactly what he was doing.

LOL where did I say that exactly? It's math that's demoralizing you, or at least should be. Don't blame me for reality's liberal bias. The delusion on here in the face of the asskicking Trump's getting in polls, betting markets, early voting results and forecasts is hilarious. You've got Trump losing in recent AZ polls but instead people on here are talking about MN going red! Minne-*******-sota! You know, the state that went for Mondale! You can either accept reality now and remember the lessons of 2012 or wait for reality to give you a nice big cockslap on November 8th.

Hillary's big lead in the polls cuts both ways though. It can lead to complacency on our side which can be just as bad. The net effect isn't much.

How about an active FBI investigation?



SURPRISE!

BUT MUH NATE

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(10-27-2016 01:41 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Delusional.

News: Hillary Clinton is buying television time in Wisconsin, per source.

Her very first ads of the general election in the state.
-- @teddyschleifer

GROUNDS FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT

Updated map.

Latest polls still do not have the latest FBI revelations completely baked in, but even when they do, we know how rigged they have still proven to be. Another example, early voter returns in Florida are showing a landslide for Trump, yet some polls still have the nerve to over sample Dems to make it look close.

Colorado, Michigan, and Pennsylvania are now all within the margin of error in the rigged polls.

If you're wondering why I left Minnesota in play, MUH NATE has Trump just as likely to win MN as MI, and MI's latest poll has Clinton +1. I want updated polling in MN, and something more reputable than "Survey Monkey".

BUT MUH MINNESOTA! -Trumpmos on Nov 8

GOP internal polling isn't as good as Dems'. Mitt Romney bought fireworks for a Boston Harbor victory party because his own pollsters fell for the unskewing theory lol

You are going on the faulty assumption that Clinton is anywhere near as competent as Obama.

(10-31-2016 07:15 PM)Kronke Wrote:  If you're wondering why I left Minnesota in play, MUH NATE has Trump just as likely to win MN as MI, and MI's latest poll has Clinton +1. I want updated polling in MN, and something more reputable than "Survey Monkey".

Wait a second. Did you just tout a SurveyMonkey poll showing Hillary +1 in Michigan, while dismissing a similar SurveyMonkey Minnesota poll because of the name? Because if so that's hilarious.

(10-31-2016 07:54 PM)bullet Wrote:  You are going on the faulty assumption that Clinton is anywhere near as competent as Obama.

Clinton is using mostly the same data operation as Obama. There are some differences like Plouffe being on the outside and Axe not being involved at all but the quality is still there.

Word is Trump just stiffed his own pollster out of $3 million.

Lol here it is. Trump's polling operation is a dumpster fire

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post...n-dollars/

Donald Trump's hiring of pollster Tony Fabrizio in May was viewed as a sign that the real estate mogul was finally bringing seasoned operatives into his insurgent operation.

But the Republican presidential nominee appears to have taken issue with some of the services provided by the veteran GOP strategist, who has advised candidates from 1996 GOP nominee Bob Dole to Florida Gov. Rick Scott. The Trump campaign's latest Federal Election Commission report shows that it is disputing nearly $767,000 that Fabrizio's firm says it is still owed for polling.

Trump campaign officials declined to provide details about the reason the campaign has declined to pay the sum to Fabrizio Lee, the pollster's Fort Lauderdale, Fla.-based firm. “This is an administrative issue that we're resolving internally,” said senior communications adviser Jason Miller. Fabrizio did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Max's map has a blue Georgia. Not sure what color the sky is above his map. He'll have to discuss that elsewhere at around 9 pm eastern time next Tuesday once Georgia is called.

(10-31-2016 08:33 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(10-31-2016 07:15 PM)Kronke Wrote:  If you're wondering why I left Minnesota in play, MUH NATE has Trump just as likely to win MN as MI, and MI's latest poll has Clinton +1. I want updated polling in MN, and something more reputable than "Survey Monkey".

Wait a second. Did you just tout a SurveyMonkey poll showing Hillary +1 in Michigan, while dismissing a similar SurveyMonkey Minnesota poll because of the name? Because if so that's hilarious.

I didn't "tout" anything, but rather show the inconsistencies of the poll. If Clinton is +1 in Michigan and +9 in Minnesota, and MUH NATE says Trump's odds of winning both states is nearly identical, something is not adding up.

I want 10/31-11/6 from credible outlets.

Georgia won't be called when the polls close.

(10-31-2016 08:52 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(10-31-2016 08:33 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(10-31-2016 07:15 PM)Kronke Wrote:  If you're wondering why I left Minnesota in play, MUH NATE has Trump just as likely to win MN as MI, and MI's latest poll has Clinton +1. I want updated polling in MN, and something more reputable than "Survey Monkey".

Wait a second. Did you just tout a SurveyMonkey poll showing Hillary +1 in Michigan, while dismissing a similar SurveyMonkey Minnesota poll because of the name? Because if so that's hilarious.

I didn't "tout" anything, but rather show the inconsistencies of the poll. If Clinton is +1 in Michigan and +9 in Minnesota, and MUH NATE says Trump's odds of winning both states is nearly identical, something is not adding up.

I want 10/31-11/6 from credible outlets.

Sampling error. SMis credible but no pollster is error proof.

Minnesota voted hard for Sanders.
Minnesota voted Rubio in the primary with Trump a pretty distant third.

But suddenly, Trump is going to take Minnesota?