(10-25-2016 03:28 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Disagree John.. I believe Assange, if he were to step off the embassy at any time.. would be an instant target for a hit squad (sanctioned or unsanctioned)... and if not, he'd be in jail in a heartbeat where someone would find him a day later with a shiv in his spine.

Again, I remember hearing about dotcom some time ago.. but I can't remember if it was for him getting busted or him reporting something he hacked into (off the top of my head), so I don't remember how 'sensationalistic' he's been.

they are not going to kill him. that would only make him a martyr and it would single handedly verify every anti-west and pro conspiracy sentiment imaginable.

he's hiding in the embassy to avoid a rape charge...in sweden.

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

Yet you gleefully slurp copiously from that trough of unethical, opportunistic, dirty money funded fraud brock. gotcha.

(10-25-2016 03:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:28 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Disagree John.. I believe Assange, if he were to step off the embassy at any time.. would be an instant target for a hit squad (sanctioned or unsanctioned)... and if not, he'd be in jail in a heartbeat where someone would find him a day later with a shiv in his spine.

Again, I remember hearing about dotcom some time ago.. but I can't remember if it was for him getting busted or him reporting something he hacked into (off the top of my head), so I don't remember how 'sensationalistic' he's been.

they are not going to kill him. that would only make him a martyr and it would single handedly verify every anti-west and pro conspiracy sentiment imaginable.

he's hiding in the embassy to avoid a rape charge...in sweden.

Oh I know about the rape charge, john.. but I just think he has made himself a target in the process.

(10-25-2016 03:33 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

am I incorrect that all three of them have a lengthy record with the justice system?

two of them are admitted hackers and the third one tried to bug a congresswoman's office.

(10-25-2016 03:43 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

Yet you gleefully slurp copiously from that trough of unethical, opportunistic, dirty money funded fraud brock. gotcha.

those three are actually unethical. the best cons have on HRC is that she misused a server that was the result of incompetence and went the extra mile to...advance a highly rated charity.

for crying out loud

(10-25-2016 03:47 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:43 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

Yet you gleefully slurp copiously from that trough of unethical, opportunistic, dirty money funded fraud brock. gotcha.

those three are actually unethical. the best cons have on HRC is that she misused a server that was the result of incompetence and went the extra mile to...advance a highly rated charity.

for crying out loud

Is that all she's done Johnny? What a doofuss.

(10-25-2016 03:57 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:47 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:43 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

Yet you gleefully slurp copiously from that trough of unethical, opportunistic, dirty money funded fraud brock. gotcha.

those three are actually unethical. the best cons have on HRC is that she misused a server that was the result of incompetence and went the extra mile to...advance a highly rated charity.

for crying out loud

Is that all she's done Johnny? What a doofuss.

sorry for inserting critical thinking into the conversation.

Yep, so critical it deserves to be on life support. It's really pitiful that you cover your eyes to her illegal dealings. What's in it for you? Has she promised you a cabinet seat?

The reason this Godmother is not in jail is because she has Oblunder and his cohorts in her pocket. She makes the Cosa Nostra look like JV.

(10-25-2016 03:28 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Disagree John.. I believe Assange, if he were to step off the embassy at any time.. would be an instant target for a hit squad (sanctioned or unsanctioned)... and if not, he'd be in jail in a heartbeat where someone would find him a day later with a shiv in his spine.

Again, I remember hearing about dotcom some time ago.. but I can't remember if it was for him getting busted or him reporting something he hacked into (off the top of my head), so I don't remember how 'sensationalistic' he's been.

He owned a music download website years ago called megasomething that has since been closed down....the RIAA wants a pound of flesh since it is done suing single moms and 13 year olds.

(10-25-2016 04:11 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Yep, so critical it deserves to be on life support. It's really pitiful that you cover your eyes to her illegal dealings. What's in it for you? Has she promised you a cabinet seat?

The reason this Godmother is not in jail is because she has Oblunder and his cohorts in her pocket. She makes the Cosa Nostra look like JV.

you have nothing to hang your hat on.

let's face it the server issue comes down to incompetence not malice and I certainly haven't seen an argument that that somehow implies corruption.

the clinton foundation is a highly rated charity with its finances in order and is by no means a personal fund. hell the whole "paid for speeches" talking point you guys love contradicts the need for a slush fund.

I've already posted Oliver's breakdown of the clinton scandals and you guys refused to watch it. yet you claim she is corrupt based on nothing more than your simply wanting it to be true and refusal to watch/look at anything that vindicates her.

the reason she isn't in jail, is because there isn't a legitimate reason to throw her in jail.

she is without a doubt the most throughly examined candidate to ever run for POTUS. and the net result is a server usage issue and pay for play on a charity. that is trivial compared to what you would find if you did the same amount of digging on the overwhelming majority of politicians.

(10-25-2016 04:16 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:28 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Disagree John.. I believe Assange, if he were to step off the embassy at any time.. would be an instant target for a hit squad (sanctioned or unsanctioned)... and if not, he'd be in jail in a heartbeat where someone would find him a day later with a shiv in his spine.

Again, I remember hearing about dotcom some time ago.. but I can't remember if it was for him getting busted or him reporting something he hacked into (off the top of my head), so I don't remember how 'sensationalistic' he's been.

He owned a music download website years ago called megasomething that has since been closed down....the RIAA wants a pound of flesh since it is done suing single moms and 13 year olds.

don't forget the crap he pulled in the stock market.

Given the number of people who are voting early, if they really had anything and wanted to influence the election, they had better have it out by now. The fact that they don't says that either they don't have any really damaging stuff, or they want her to be elected and then cripple her by releasing the really problematic stuff. I actually think the latter is a real possibility.

(10-25-2016 03:47 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:43 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

Yet you gleefully slurp copiously from that trough of unethical, opportunistic, dirty money funded fraud brock. gotcha.

those three are actually unethical. the best cons have on HRC is that she misused a server that was the result of incompetence and went the extra mile to...advance a highly rated charity.

for crying out loud

So, you admit she's incompetent, yet feel she's worthy of a promotion, cause.... Feels?

And I'd say leading the charge to spearhead the efforts to promote the violence at Trump rallies is pretty unethical. Never mind that scrub the server stuff, not turning over the peoples property whether under subpoena or not, and openly sharing our classified information to damn near anyone in the world.

What part of her job description as SOS (read public servant, OUR employee) outlined her responsibilities to "Continue to advance the criminal syndicate clintoon family front group"? I don't see that outlined anywhere...

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

You're voting for an unethical POS and have a problem with others who may be?

(10-25-2016 03:04 PM)john01992 Wrote:  of those three figures: one is hiding in an embassy to avoid extradition, one is under house arrest fighting off extradition, and the last one has been convicted

And the one you're voting for should be in prison at a minimum and possibly in front of a firing squad.

(10-25-2016 03:47 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:43 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

Yet you gleefully slurp copiously from that trough of unethical, opportunistic, dirty money funded fraud brock. gotcha.

those three are actually unethical. the best cons have on HRC is that she misused a server that was the result of incompetence and went the extra mile to...advance a highly rated charity.

for crying out loud

You're delusional. And as dishonest as the Obama admin and Hillary's campaign.

(10-25-2016 03:45 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:33 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-25-2016 02:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Do libs slam anyone who doesn't toe the line for the corruption machine? It's like a gag reflex.

only the unethical POS like Assange, Okeefe, and Kim Dot Com.

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

am I incorrect that all three of them have a lengthy record with the justice system?

two of them are admitted hackers and the third one tried to bug a congresswoman's office.

I must've forgot to bold the word for you. There ya go. In reality anyone who supports Clinton can never be relied on to lecture someone on ethics.

He's unethical, but unlike her, within the laws.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Kim Dot Com. owned a Bit Torrent website that shared Music, Movies, Games that Millions of people world wide downloaded from including nearly every liberal I knew that wanted the latest media for free. MegaUpload was just like the Pirate Bay,Kicka$$ Torrents and dozens of other similar sites. Hollywood and RIAA hated Him but He was a darling to many worldwide leftists.

"You are not allowed to call out someone on ethics because of HRC"

-Said by a con while defending someone who commuted major violations in the stock market.

Oh the irony

So the only ones who can speak then are the few of us who call out both Clinton and Trump.

Listen up you bastards...