(08-01-2016 09:46 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Its amazing to see how many people say all lives matter but they cant say black lives matter. It speaks volumes.

Because black lives don't matter.

(08-01-2016 09:38 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  If all lives matter then black lives matter. Why cant you say that?

(08-01-2016 09:39 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 09:38 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  If all lives matter then black lives matter. Why cant you say that?

One is inclusive and the other discriminates.

Because apparently discrimination is just fine on the left side aisle...

(08-01-2016 10:05 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 09:38 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  If all lives matter then black lives matter. Why cant you say that?

(08-01-2016 09:39 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 09:38 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  If all lives matter then black lives matter. Why cant you say that?

One is inclusive and the other discriminates.

Because apparently discrimination is just fine on the left side aisle...

It really is that simple. People that spout otherwise are just being obtuse and argumentative for argument's sake.

(08-01-2016 09:39 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 09:38 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  If all lives matter then black lives matter. Why cant you say that?

One is inclusive and the other discriminates.

(08-01-2016 09:46 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Its amazing to see how many people say all lives matter but they cant say black lives matter. It speaks volumes.

No more amazing than the number of people who get their nickers in a twist over "All lives matter"

(a) holy crap, the SGA president can suspend another student? WTFF!?!?
(b) holy crap, the SGA vice president makes $700 a month? $WTFF!?!?

Bull in Exile

I have no problem saying all lives matter because I truly believe it. That is why I can say black lives matter and even blue lives matter. Try it.

From the quote....she said Forget (Hashtag) Black Lives Matter. She didn't say "forget black lives matter". Seems to me she was simply saying that the hashtag movement should be "All Lives Matter".

(08-01-2016 11:02 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Bull in Exile

I have no problem saying all lives matter because I truly believe it. That is why I can say black lives matter and even blue lives matter. Try it.

The first includes everything else. Why be redundant other than to be intentionally obtuse?

(08-01-2016 11:02 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Bull in Exile

I have no problem saying all lives matter because I truly believe it. That is why I can say black lives matter and even blue lives matter. Try it.

I have said it fit. I've even commented on how BLM and the Right missed a chance to connect early in their movement...

Try reading what people say instead of assuming you know what they would say.

So is it true that the SGA president was the one that handed down the punishment?


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

(08-01-2016 12:01 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So is it true that the SGA president was the one that handed down the punishment?


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Yes.

(08-01-2016 12:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 12:01 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So is it true that the SGA president was the one that handed down the punishment?


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Yes.

Is he allowed to do that? Especially since his suspension means that she will lose her tuition stipend? Time to get a lawyer.


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Bull in Exile

I wouldnt be surprised if you said it. You are more moderate than the others.

(08-01-2016 12:06 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 12:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 12:01 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So is it true that the SGA president was the one that handed down the punishment?


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Yes.

Is he allowed to do that? Especially since his suspension means that she will lose her tuition stipend? Time to get a lawyer.

You're probably right in that's where it's headed.

(08-01-2016 12:01 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So is it true that the SGA president was the one that handed down the punishment?


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Quote:A full removal of Sethi has significant hurdles, though. The student government constitution requires the student body president, president of the student senate and three-fourths of present student senators to approve impeachment proceedings. Sethi would then be tried by the student supreme court.

Instead of going through that arduous process, the student senate approved a measure giving SGA president Shane Smith exceptional one-time powers to punish Sethi as he saw fit.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/31/all-li...z4G6OiLG41

they one-offed a hired gun. removing you from your post temporarily is one thing.

either the headline is misleading, or the story is incomplete. was she suspended form the SGA, or suspended from the university?

I suppose I can see being suspended from your position. suspension from school is another matter entirely.

Suspended from her position, not from the university.

(08-01-2016 12:06 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 12:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 12:01 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So is it true that the SGA president was the one that handed down the punishment?

Yes.

Is he allowed to do that? Especially since his suspension means that she will lose her tuition stipend?

Apparently he has a pen and a phone.

So black lives don't matter?

If "all lives" don't matter, then black lives definitely don't. Right?