(09-07-2015 11:04 AM)HuskieAlumnus03 Wrote: (09-07-2015 10:59 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: (09-07-2015 09:24 AM)FlyHawk98 Wrote: Of course that's what happened. NIU always has some excuse for their attendance.
Just face it man, your attendance is pathetic for as much as you guys have been winning the last few years. Also, no one would really care if you weren't always out running your mouth about how NIU was a contender for a spot in the Big 12. Or if you would stop trying to claim the Chicago market. Start actually drawing the DeKalb market first.
At least 15,000 fans is an improvement from your average of 13k last year.
The more annoying part is the belief that if they were in the American their attendance would suddenly be 25-30k
Why does that annoy you?
1 - because it's not true, it's excuse making. when you make excuses you won't get better.
Toledo and Ohio have proven that you don't need to play UConn or ECU every other year to get asses in the seats. NIU is winning more than either program so look at your own AD for the problem.
Buffalo is not winning big but our attendance is up about 20-33% since the new Athletic Director came in. We just opened a West Club which requires a 1.2K per season donation and it's sold out (about 500K more in revenue).
2 - because its shaqing on the rest of the conference.
I think Buffalo would do better attendance wise in the AAC but not because folks would rather see Temple than EMU per se. I'm not going to blame Ohio or Akron for Buffalo's attendance problems (despite the improvement we still have problems).
We would do better because our Alumni outside of Buffalo are mainly in the Boston to DC corridor and because Temple, UConn, Cinci, Navy are closer to UB than some of the schools in the MAC West.
Navy and Cinci are as far from Buffalo as Miami. And unlike EMU/CMU/WMU you don't need to cross an international border (twice) to get there.
NIU is the opposite situation.