(05-01-2015 04:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: A few things Owl:
-Tax Rates mean squat really. It's the effective rate and the number of profitable corporations that pay nothing.
They mean everything. They are used in the ROI calculations for capital expenditure requests in order to determine future cash flow. This determines how likely a company is to invest in a certain area. Even if my company paid zero taxes last year, I can not submit a CER with a zero tax rate, because that would cause the the numbers to be completely wrong.
It's laughable that you believe "highly profitable" corporations pay nothing in taxes. Show me a few you think this applies to, and we'll show you your fallacy. (Unless you show us the Clinton foundation, George Soros, and any anchor on MSNBC, in which case you may have a point.)
Also, you lefties need to get off your butt-hurtedness about companies being profitable. There is only one entity that states a company MUST be profitable, and that is the US government, specifically the IRS.
One more point, before you go off and try to put a list together of companies who paid no taxes; submit 3 consecutive years of taxes paid by that company. Dont cherry pick a year here, and a year there. You have to do it correctly. Cherry picking isnt correct.
Quote:-Corporations are double taxed? What?
Start one up, make it profitable, and let's see if you still question that remark.
Quote:-Most people call loopholes areas of the tax law that were unintended to be there. These are vastly different than legitimate credits that are legislated into law to reduce tax burdens.
It's still a loophole. It's an intended one versus an unintended one. The issue with a complex tax laws ( and other laws in general) is that the people writing them are either not experienced enough in the area, or do not spend enough time vetting out their own law to notice the loopholes. Then, you have the intentional loopholes created for cronyism.