Easy second place if he goes 4 years

(10-01-2014 11:09 PM)FUT Wrote:  No clue but that DeAngelo number is just sick. What a treat that guy was.

Considering he had a single season which was good enough to put him in top 10 career rushing. Yea his number were sick as

In some ways it explains just how great he is, but in other ways it puts a major question mark on the other running backs in the programs history.

After DeAngelo that's a pretty sad list. Would like to see him get to #2.

(10-02-2014 07:33 PM)Rob Wrote:  After DeAngelo that's a pretty sad list. Would like to see him get to #2.

Steele was pretty good, I'm thinking if he played 4 years he would easily be 2nd behind DeAngelo and I think its quite possible that the gap between Steel and Deangelo at 2 and 1 would have been smaller than the gap between Steel and the number 3 on the list. In other words, it would be DeAngelo and Curtis, and then a big gap between them and the rest of the list.

It depends. If we can get ahead in some games, he SHOULD be used to sock a game away. I'll go 4790.

(10-02-2014 08:31 PM)idroot4russia Wrote:  

(10-02-2014 07:33 PM)Rob Wrote:  After DeAngelo that's a pretty sad list. Would like to see him get to #2.

Steele was pretty good, I'm thinking if he played 4 years he would easily be 2nd behind DeAngelo and I think its quite possible that the gap between Steel and Deangelo at 2 and 1 would have been smaller than the gap between Steel and the number 3 on the list. In other words, it would be DeAngelo and Curtis, and then a big gap between them and the rest of the list.

I'm not trashing the guys on the list, just the numbers by their names.

Most Yards Rushing
Rk Yds Player Years
1. 6,026 DeAngelo Williams 2002-05
2. 2,636 Dave Casinelli 1960-63
3. 2,462 Curtis Steele 2008-09
4. 2,378 Gerard Arnold 1997-99
5. 2,339 Joseph Doss 2004-07
6. 2,227 Paul Gowen 1969-71
7. 2,194 Larry Porter 1990-93
8. 1,970 Terdell Middleton 1973-76
30. 1,013 Gerald White 1986-89

264 J Cooper

I remember an nfl announcer saying Middleton had the worst name in nfl history.

(10-02-2014 09:47 AM)MemTiger90 Wrote:  Jarvis definitely has the potential to be great, but I don't think he will get the touches to collect "all time" type numbers. He will get a good amount of touches this year. Then next year, it appears most touches will go to Dorceus and Kimbrow. You also throw in RD. Jarvis' touches may be limited

Again, he should have been redshirted. Zero need for him this year. Hayes, Dorceus, Craft, Davis, and Wallace would have been fine.

(10-26-2014 09:32 PM)NDTiger Wrote:  Again, he should have been redshirted. Zero need for him this year. Hayes, Dorceus, Craft, Davis, and Wallace would have been fine.

Well, except for that Dorceus is done, Craft is out 3-4 more weeks and Hayes has been hurt for a couple of games...

I guess those other two will suffice...

(10-26-2014 09:32 PM)NDTiger Wrote:  Again, he should have been redshirted. Zero need for him this year. Hayes, Dorceus, Craft, Davis, and Wallace would have been fine.

If he wanted to redshirt he would have went to Arkansas

(10-26-2014 10:28 PM)GringoStarr Wrote:  

(10-26-2014 09:32 PM)NDTiger Wrote:  Again, he should have been redshirted. Zero need for him this year. Hayes, Dorceus, Craft, Davis, and Wallace would have been fine.

Well, except for that Dorceus is done, Craft is out 3-4 more weeks and Hayes has been hurt for a couple of games...

I guess those other two will suffice...

His redshirt would have likely been pulled yesterday after injury to Craft.

(10-26-2014 10:38 PM)Oceana Tiger Wrote:  

(10-26-2014 09:32 PM)NDTiger Wrote:  Again, he should have been redshirted. Zero need for him this year. Hayes, Dorceus, Craft, Davis, and Wallace would have been fine.

If he wanted to redshirt he would have went to Arkansas

This is probably very true.

Not playing him likely cost us the Houston game. Glad to see him yesterday against SMU.

Not being able to contain mobile quarterbacks is what cost us the Houston game.

(10-27-2014 08:53 AM)idroot4russia Wrote:  Not being able to contain mobile quarterbacks is what cost us the Houston game.

5 turnovers cost us this game.

Why redshirt Cooper?

(10-27-2014 09:02 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  Why redshirt Cooper?

At the beginning of the year we had enough depth to probably justify it, however, at this point in the season and two RB injuries later, it would have definitely been pulled.

(10-27-2014 09:02 AM)2tigers Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 08:53 AM)idroot4russia Wrote:  Not being able to contain mobile quarterbacks is what cost us the Houston game.

5 turnovers cost us this game.

Houston was better than we expected. They beat Temple handily over the weekend. 5 Turnovers, letting Ward (?) be a free range QB, etc-all true.

But Houston is heading in the right direction.