Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
Who is against NMSU in all sports
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,299
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 446
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #1
Who is against NMSU in all sports
And why?

Just curious.
05-19-2014 11:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


GoApps70 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 20,650
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 290
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location: Charlotte, N. C.
Post: #2
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
Would be surprised if they are not added as full members soon.
Not too much opposition it seems.
[Image: R3SCx_zps31d3432b.jpg~original]
05-19-2014 11:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Cat79 Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 741
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 14
I Root For: Texas State
Location: Pearland, Texas
Post: #3
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
Their basketball is a plus to the SBC. They should be added asap.
05-19-2014 11:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hemi Man Offline
Hector's Homeboy
*

Posts: 2,199
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 78
I Root For: Troy
Location:
Post: #4
Who is against NMSU in all sports
Nothing against them personally, I just prefer a tighter geographical footprint for the conference. Benson talks about less money games in football, but trips to New Mexico for non revenue sports would have to be paid for by someone.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
05-19-2014 11:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoApps70 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 20,650
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 290
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location: Charlotte, N. C.
Post: #5
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
We have heard so many scenarios the last few months, but yet no
action evidently, makes you think the SBC presidents have something
different in mind than what we are considering.
[Image: qsRhn4L_zpse849c417.jpg~original]
05-19-2014 11:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BruceMcF Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,188
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 785
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 11:55 AM)GoApps70 Wrote:  We have heard so many scenarios the last few months, but yet no
action evidently, makes you think the SBC presidents have something
different in mind than what we are considering.
The number of scenarios themselves ~ each with their obvious downsides that have been aired by the opponents of each move here ~ could all on their own explain the decision to put off making a decision. You only need 4 schools favoring one move, 4 schools favoring a second move and 3 schools favoring a third to have gridlock on the way to a 9-2 vote in favor.

And several of the scenarios can't happen in this year anyway, so some "wait and see what happens" votes can come from schools who are really thinking "give my preferred option time to mature".

Benson is declared in favor of a 12/12 model, which narrows down the possible ways to do an NMSU all-sports add, and some opposition could be opposition to the other moving piece.

It would be interesting to have an insider's view of the whip count against NMSU all-sports in some form or other, and how many of those are schools who weren't even a gleam in the Sunbelt's eyes last time NMSU was an all-sports member.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 12:18 PM by BruceMcF.)
05-19-2014 12:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


GoApps70 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 20,650
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 290
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location: Charlotte, N. C.
Post: #7
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
Going back seems as if the only one school most seemed to agree about
adding was JMU.

[Image: scenic_tower_zps2a996795.jpg~original]
05-19-2014 12:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BruceMcF Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,188
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 785
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 12:15 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Going back seems as if the only one school most seemed to agree about adding was JMU.
Yes, that seems the only potential FCS-transition both clearly ready to move up and likely to get a 9-2 vote or better. That JMU didn't want the spot is not an unusual situation ... the ideal realignment partner from a conference's perspective is typically a member already or has some reason that they aren't.

"JMU sees sense and realizes that they are assigning the potential opening in the Sunbelt the full value it deserves" would be among the "wait and see" option, since that would be a likely slow process of evolution.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 12:27 PM by BruceMcF.)
05-19-2014 12:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GaSoEagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,435
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 89
I Root For: Ga Southern
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
I believe the plan remains to add an eastern all-sports member. Possibly that could be Eastern Kentucky next year or maybe Missouri St..
05-19-2014 12:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BruceMcF Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,188
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 785
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 12:23 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I believe the plan remains to add an eastern all-sports member. Possibly that could be Eastern Kentucky next year or maybe Missouri St..
Would EKU be ready to join next year?

At least Missouri State has their luxury box addition and brushing up of their away stand underway ... but would Missouri State be an eastern add?
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 12:26 PM by BruceMcF.)
05-19-2014 12:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TheRevSWT Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,502
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 133
I Root For: Bobcats!
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
Who is against NMSU all sports?

Communists.
05-19-2014 12:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


SlyFox Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,788
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 120
I Root For: Liberty
Location: Lake Conroe, Texas
Post: #12
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
I apparently have no dog left in the fight based on today's media reports, but NMSU remains a serious geographical outlier with subpar Olympics in everything except men's hoops. And even that program isn't quite as strong as some are suggesting having been unable to win a regular season title in seven seasons in a league made up of random pieces holding on for dear life. But they certainly do a have a great history.
05-19-2014 12:39 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoApps70 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 20,650
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 290
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location: Charlotte, N. C.
Post: #13
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 12:23 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I believe the plan remains to add an eastern all-sports member. Possibly that could be Eastern Kentucky next year or maybe Missouri St..

Wouldn't consider Missouri State Eastern.
[Image: campus_green_zps461aaa1a.jpg~original]
05-19-2014 12:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tom in Lazybrook Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,299
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 446
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
Post: #14
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 12:39 PM)SlyFox Wrote:  I apparently have no dog left in the fight based on today's media reports, but NMSU remains a serious geographical outlier with subpar Olympics in everything except men's hoops. And even that program isn't quite as strong as some are suggesting having been unable to win a regular season title in seven seasons in a league made up of random pieces holding on for dear life. But they certainly do a have a great history.

You still have a dog in the fight. Just probably not this year.

Oddly enough, adding NMSU probably helps LU over UMass because it would start the move to all sports and leave Idaho (who has a 'kick out clause') as the only football only.

Their men's basketball success is a huge advantage for them. We already have their football, so lets at least get a benefit from basketball as part of the deal is the thought process.
05-19-2014 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoApps70 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 20,650
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 290
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location: Charlotte, N. C.
Post: #15
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
[Image: ss-blue-ridge-mountains_zps6e35dc80.jpg~original]
Makes it a more odd move last year concerning NMSU and Idaho if they are not adding a 12th team.
05-19-2014 12:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BruceMcF Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,188
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 785
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 12:39 PM)SlyFox Wrote:  I apparently have no dog left in the fight based on today's media reports, but NMSU remains a serious geographical outlier with subpar Olympics in everything except men's hoops.
When I asked the question whether NMSU's baseball this year is typical or unusual, several on this board suggested that they are normally above par in baseball.

Indeed, the argument by western schools that Sunbelt has NMSU's worst sports, may as well get their better ones seems likely focused on BBall first, daylight second, baseball third, and "didn't check before making the statement because none of the others matter as much" finishing out of the money in a big crowd behind.

BBall may only play a secondary role in conference realignment, but it takes unusual circumstances for any other sport to play any role ~ meeting some NCAA requirement, some special concern of particular schools (eg, Maryland and Big Ten Lacrosse), or something like that. Normally its a case of FB first by a massive margin, BBall the remaining consideration, and the other sports coming into play when toting up the travel costs associated with the expansion.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 01:00 PM by BruceMcF.)
05-19-2014 01:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 41,835
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 2390
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 12:39 PM)SlyFox Wrote:  I apparently have no dog left in the fight based on today's media reports, but NMSU remains a serious geographical outlier with subpar Olympics in everything except men's hoops. And even that program isn't quite as strong as some are suggesting having been unable to win a regular season title in seven seasons in a league made up of random pieces holding on for dear life. But they certainly do a have a great history.

Do not belittle my school's oly-sports. MBB may have not won regular season championships, but you left out the fact that we have won 4 out of the last 5 years WAC Tournament Championships,also in 2007. Won regular season in 2008. Our Volleyball has won back to back WAC Championships (2012-13) and regular season in 2013. They have also been in the top 25 in attendence since 2005. Men's Golf have been WAC Conference Champs (2006,2008-11, 2013-14). Women's Golf Were the WAC Conference Champs this year. Men's and Women's Tennis were in the WAC Conference finals this year.

I have not seen an NMSU fan say anything negative about LU and I will not start to either.
05-19-2014 02:45 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AtlantaJag Offline
Beltbbs USA INsider
*

Posts: 2,693
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 78
I Root For: USA Jaguars
Location:
Post: #18
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 11:18 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  And why?

Just curious.

I'm pretty certain there are several ADs of eastern schools that are not in favor of adding NMSU because of the expense of travel for all sports.
05-19-2014 02:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrazyCajun Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,317
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation: 60
I Root For: Louisiana
Location:
Post: #19
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 12:39 PM)SlyFox Wrote:  I apparently have no dog left in the fight based on today's media reports, but NMSU remains a serious geographical outlier with subpar Olympics in everything except men's hoops. And even that program isn't quite as strong as some are suggesting having been unable to win a regular season title in seven seasons in a league made up of random pieces holding on for dear life. But they certainly do a have a great history.

You are currently not a member, so yes move along.
05-19-2014 02:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
panama Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 31,353
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 633
I Root For: Georgia STATE
Location: East Atlanta Village
Post: #20
RE: Who is against NMSU in all sports
(05-19-2014 11:46 AM)Hemi Man Wrote:  Nothing against them personally, I just prefer a tighter geographical footprint for the conference. Benson talks about less money games in football, but trips to New Mexico for non revenue sports would have to be paid for by someone.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Youre already going to San Antonio, TX for Texas State. El Paso, TX is just a few more minutes of a flight.
05-19-2014 03:14 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.