Quote:U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan of Washington, D.C., the judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s case in the district, previously worked at a law firm that once employed Hunter Biden and worked closely with Ukrainian energy firm Burisma.
Chutkan spent 12 years working for Boies, Schiller, & Flexner LLP (BSF) where she specialized in white collar litigation and antitrust defense, before she was nominated to her current position by former President Obama, her official bio states.
Quote:That’s the same Tanya Chutkan who represented Theranos at Boies Schiller (the firm that hired Fusion GPS to attack Theranos whistleblowers) and then presided as judge in the U.S. House lawsuit against Fusion GPS. Completely corrupt.
Chutkan worked at other private sector law firms and served as a public defender in Washington D.C. prior to her tenure at BSF. She graduated from George Washington University and the University of Pennsylvania law school.
“Perhaps as important as all the skillsets that she has, she is a person of just consummate decency,” Don Flexner said in December 2013 when Chutkan was nominated, the Legal Times previously reported. “I think she will be a welcome addition to the bench in Washington.”
Hunter Biden worked for BSF in the same year he was appointed to Burisma’s board in April 2014. Hunter quickly brought BSF partners into the fold to assist Burisma with its efforts to influence U.S. officials, according to emails on Hunter Biden’s laptop.
In April 2014, Hunter Biden and business associate Devon Archer spoke about how BSF could give them “protection” and work with government officials on Burisma’s behalf.
“BSF can actually have direct discussions at state, energy and NSC. They can devise a media plan and arrange for legal protections and mitigate US domestic negative press regarding the current leadership if need be,” Biden told Archer.
“The contract should begin now- not after the upcoming visit of my guy. That should include a retainer in the range of 25k p/m w/ additional fees where appropriate for more in depth work to go to BSF for our protection. Complete separate from our respective deals re board participation,” Biden added.
Shortly after his correspondence with Archer, Biden set up a call with BSF partners including Christopher Boies and Heather King, the emails show.
King communicated with the State Department on behalf of Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky and strategized with Burisma on how to handle the press and influence government officials, emails from May 2014 indicate. She suggested Burisma hire professional lobbyists, a PR firm and an investigative research firm to bolster its influence operation, per the emails.
Trump was indicted Tuesday in Washington, D.C. by Department of Justice (DOJ) Special Counsel Jack Smith for allegedly interfering in the 2020 presidential election and his alleged involvement in the Jan. 6th, 2021 Capitol riot. Trump announced the indictment on Truth Social right before the news broke.
“This is nothing more than the latest corrupt chapter in the continued pathetic attempt by the Biden Crime Family and their weaponized Department of Justice to interfere with the 2024 Presidential Election,” the Trump campaign said in a statement.
“President Trump will not be deterred by disgraceful and unprecedented political targeting!”
Link
The same judge that was approved 95-0 by the Senate.
(08-01-2023 07:03 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]The same judge that was approved 95-0 by the Senate.
Because republicans are pu$$ie$ who don't know how to be an opposition. And Mitch couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.
(08-01-2023 07:12 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2023 07:03 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]The same judge that was approved 95-0 by the Senate.
Because republicans are pu$$ie$ who don't know how to be an opposition. And Mitch couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.
Republicans don't want to be an opposition party. They don't have the balls to fight back. They cower in fear of the Democrats calling them racist.
(08-01-2023 07:22 PM)andybible1995 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2023 07:12 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2023 07:03 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]The same judge that was approved 95-0 by the Senate.
Because republicans are pu$$ie$ who don't know how to be an opposition. And Mitch couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.
Republicans don't want to be an opposition party. They don't have the balls to fight back. They cower in fear of the Democrats calling them racist.
Andy…
That’s the establishment Republican Party…
The New America First Conservative Republican Party does care about being called racist.
(08-01-2023 07:39 PM)CardinalJim Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2023 07:22 PM)andybible1995 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2023 07:12 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2023 07:03 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]The same judge that was approved 95-0 by the Senate.
Because republicans are pu$$ie$ who don't know how to be an opposition. And Mitch couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.
Republicans don't want to be an opposition party. They don't have the balls to fight back. They cower in fear of the Democrats calling them racist.
Andy…
That’s the establishment Republican Party…
The New America First Conservative Republican Party does care about being called racist.
I'm assuming you meant to put a n't at the end of that.
Trump’s Jan 6 Judge Trial is Foreign-Born, BLM Apologist, Obama Donor, Who Has Over-Sentenced Jan 6 Prisoners.
Quote:Tanya Sue Chutkan, the US federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s criminal case in Washington D.C., is an Obama appointee and donor, as well as an especially vocal Black Lives Matter (BLM) apologist who has now presided over many of the harshest over-sentences handed to Jan. 6 protestors. Chutkan, a 61-year-old born in Jamaica, also persistently tried to stymie the Trump administration between 2017 and 2021. Her husband Peter Krauthamer is also an Obama appointee.
Chutkan has prosecuted 38 people involved in the January 6th protests so far, with 19 sentences that “exceeded prosecutors’ recommendations.” Her rhetoric against the protestors was no less subdued. She argued:
“It has to be made clear that trying to violently overthrow the government, trying to stop the peaceful transition of power and assaulting law enforcement officers in that effort is going to be met with absolutely certain punishment.“
Chutkan has raged about the issue, claiming protesters, “soiled and defaced the halls of the Capitol and showed their contempt for the rule of law,” though her comments on Black Lives Matter were far more subdued. The D.C. judge called BLM rioters “people protesting, mostly peacefully, for civil rights,” referring to the widespread chaos and destruction in the summer of 2020 as: “People gathered all over the country last year to protest the violent murder by the police of an unarmed man.”
In 2017, Chutkan issued a restraining order against the Trump admin policy of prohibiting migrants from leaving detention facilities for abortions. She ruled immigration officials are required to transport migrants “promptly and without delay… to an abortion provider, in order to obtain any pregnancy or abortion-related medical care.”
The Obama judge also tried to block scheduled executions of rapists and murderers on death row, bizarrely arguing that allowing the executions would deprive the inmates of their ability to pursue challenges in the court.
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
A judge formerly worked for a law firm.
(08-02-2023 02:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
A judge formerly worked for a law firm.
Looks like yum yum woke up today.
(08-02-2023 02:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
A judge formerly worked for a law firm.
But not every judge worked for a law firm that employed Hunter Biden. You kind of missed the point.
(08-02-2023 04:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2023 02:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
A judge formerly worked for a law firm.
But not every judge worked for a law firm that employed Hunter Biden. You kind of missed the point.
He's too busy performing DNC yum yum duties to ever get the point.
The Biden crime syndicate is fighting for its life. The communist-socialist are fighting for their lives. It’s time the conservatives fight like they are fighting for their lives. At present we are carrying pillows to a gun fight.
(08-02-2023 04:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2023 02:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
A judge formerly worked for a law firm.
But not every judge worked for a law firm that employed Hunter Biden. You kind of missed the point.
So what that she worked for Boies Schiller? And so what that Hunter previously worked there?
Is the new rule that any attorney that worked for any law firm that employed any person with any political tie is suspect? Seroiusly?
Or are you just limiting the rank speculation to Hunter?
Or should we extend this tenuous connection paradigm to Ailleen Cannon and her work at Gibson Dunn?
Sorry, that is a real thin stretch, #s.
(08-01-2023 07:03 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]The same judge that was approved 95-0 by the Senate.
And your point is??????
(08-02-2023 05:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2023 04:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2023 02:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
A judge formerly worked for a law firm.
But not every judge worked for a law firm that employed Hunter Biden. You kind of missed the point.
So what that she worked for Boies Schiller? And so what that Hunter previously worked there?
Is the new rule that any attorney that worked for any law firm that employed any person with any political tie is suspect? Seroiusly?
Or are you just limiting the rank speculation to Hunter?
Or should we extend this tenuous connection paradigm to Ailleen Cannon and her work at Gibson Dunn?
Sorry, that is a real thin stretch, #s.
I call it a Stacked Deck, but it's a small world isn't it.
(08-02-2023 06:57 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2023 05:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2023 04:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2023 02:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!
A judge formerly worked for a law firm.
But not every judge worked for a law firm that employed Hunter Biden. You kind of missed the point.
So what that she worked for Boies Schiller? And so what that Hunter previously worked there?
Is the new rule that any attorney that worked for any law firm that employed any person with any political tie is suspect? Seroiusly?
Or are you just limiting the rank speculation to Hunter?
Or should we extend this tenuous connection paradigm to Ailleen Cannon and her work at Gibson Dunn?
Sorry, that is a real thin stretch, #s.
I call it a Stacked Deck, but it's a small world isn't it.
I call it such a tenuous link to be absurdly stupid.
I mean, jeezus aych krist, I worked at a firm that had a future Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court, and a future Texas Senator.
Another that was founded by a past Democratic national committee chair, and had a future chief of staff of a Republican President.
Means. nothing,
But it is enough to get the howler monkeys baying.
Don't know what the relationship, if any, was between this judge and Hunter. Probably none, but don't know.
Don't know the firm either, but it would be a fair bet that any firm that hired a Biden would lean left.
The connections with Burisma and Fusion GPS are also potentially concerning.
There certainly might be enough to constitute a legitimate conflict. Whether it's a problem or not would depend on answers to those questions. But I don't think it can be dismissed with something as condescending as, "Breaking news! A judge formerly worked for a law firm."
This judge is tough on crime, so you can't have it both ways. She would throw the book at Hunter Biden if the alleged crimes that he did were true, and found guilty in a court of law.