CSNbbs

Full Version: Tech vs Uh Non-Partisan Thoughts
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
What are the the thoughts of the non-Houston/non-Lubbock fans on this game? While I think both fan-bases would like for the other schools to give a ****, I’m not sure anyone does. Prove me wrong.
(09-05-2022 05:35 PM)spaz Wrote: [ -> ]What are the the thoughts of the non-Houston/non-Lubbock fans on this game? While I think both fan-bases would like for the other schools to give a ****, I’m not sure anyone does. Prove me wrong.

I’ll definitely be tuning in! I’ll be rooting for the team that has some red in their jersey. 03-lmfao03-lmfao
I think it's a fun matchup. It's going to take some time, but I expect Houston's old Southwest Conference rivalries to gain steam in the coming years.
This is the start of UH's two week Big 12 trial membership. @Tech this week host Kansas the next. Should be fun!
(09-06-2022 11:47 AM)WhoseHouse? Wrote: [ -> ]This is the start of UH's two week Big 12 trial membership. @Tech this week host Kansas the next. Should be fun!

Tech should handle Coog High easily.
(09-06-2022 12:18 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-06-2022 11:47 AM)WhoseHouse? Wrote: [ -> ]This is the start of UH's two week Big 12 trial membership. @Tech this week host Kansas the next. Should be fun!

Tech should handle Coog High easily.


You may be in for a rude awakening if you believe this.


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!
(09-06-2022 12:18 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-06-2022 11:47 AM)WhoseHouse? Wrote: [ -> ]This is the start of UH's two week Big 12 trial membership. @Tech this week host Kansas the next. Should be fun!

Tech should handle Coog High easily.

Cool, go bet the farm on it then
Tech wins...pretty easily.

Sent from my SM-N975U using CSNbbs mobile app
(09-06-2022 12:35 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-06-2022 12:18 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-06-2022 11:47 AM)WhoseHouse? Wrote: [ -> ]This is the start of UH's two week Big 12 trial membership. @Tech this week host Kansas the next. Should be fun!

Tech should handle Coog High easily.


You may be in for a rude awakening if you believe this.


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!
I believe Tech not only "should"...but WILL hand UH a comfortable loss.

17 points...

Sent from my SM-N975U using CSNbbs mobile app
Coogs coog it a week after almost cooging it. A cooging is coming.
I am not sure about either team, I do know that raider fans are hyper excited and seem to believe their team is wayyyyy better than Houston, believing their own hype but then saying their fans will carry the day ?
I’ll be honest here, I’m not really aligned with the rest of UH’s fan base on this one. I don’t think UH or UTSA looked all that hot last weekend. A lot of our fans seem to think UTSA is really good and that they will win in Austin, but I think they start the year 1-2 with 0-3 being a real possibility (tough schedule).

I’m concerned we read too many press clippings this off season and forgot how fortunate we were to win 12 in a row last year. I’m concerned our oline will get their asses whipped. I’m not sold on our secondary. I totally understand why Tech fans are confident because I sure as hell am not lol.
(09-08-2022 11:54 AM)Charlie Broadway Wrote: [ -> ]I’ll be honest here, I’m not really aligned with the rest of UH’s fan base on this one. I don’t think UH or UTSA looked all that hot last weekend. A lot of our fans seem to think UTSA is really good and that they will win in Austin, but I think they start the year 1-2 with 0-3 being a real possibility (tough schedule).

I’m concerned we read too many press clippings this off season and forgot how fortunate we were to win 12 in a row last year. I’m concerned our oline will get their asses whipped. I’m not sold on our secondary. I totally understand why Tech fans are confident because I sure as hell am not lol.

I agree with UTSA. They are good team but I wouldn't be surprised if UAB or another team wins that conference. They are well coached though and their QB is solid and has experience. Houston/Holgorsen seems to start off slow in week 1 games and then pick up steam during the season. Case in point, Houston blowing a 21-7 lead to Tech in week 1 last year and then followed that L with a hot streak.

During the UTSA game I made the comment on the game thread on how I couldn't believe we were down at the half. Why? The first half of that UTSA game, Houston owned the TOP and were excellent on 3rd down conversions while UTSA was abysmal on 3rd and 4th down. The UH play calling was relying heavily on the mediocre run game and there were a few key dimes from Tune that were dropped that ended drives but Tune was still efficient. Houston also had 7 points on an absolute fire punt return from Dell erased on a bad call. UTSA scored 14 points on two big plays. The Harris 38 yard scramble and that WR 51 yard. Review the film. Good play by the WR and QB but piss poor tackling from the defense. The second half was a different animal. The D line ("Sack Ave") finally registered a sack and were consistently getting pressure. After that tip drill the offense started attacking. Tune adjusted and started using his feet because the UTSA defense focused on taking away the Tune - Dell connection and they had no adjustment for Tune running through them. That 21-7 lead quickly evaporated in 1 quarter. Again, Harris made two big plays on that last drive to setup the fg to tie it. 4 big plays was a significant portion of his production. Houston's biggest ? going into the season was replacing our secondary and they still are my biggest concern going into Lubbock. One thing I'm not concerned about is Tune and Dell. Certified ballers! biggest key stat from this game for me is Houston owned the TOP differential by a whole 11 minute including a whole 10 mins in the fourth quarter! THey started faking injuries because the defense was so tired lol

This was a great replay summary of the game from Alamodome Audible. They also had a good podcast on the game:


UH should be 0-2 but I will take 1-1

LMAO at Coog High
(09-10-2022 07:11 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]UH should be 0-2 but I will take 1-1

LMAO at Coog High


You mean should be 2-0*


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!
Coog High they are who we thought they were!
(09-10-2022 07:12 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2022 07:11 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]UH should be 0-2 but I will take 1-1

LMAO at Coog High


You mean should be 2-0*


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!

If you had a coach.
(09-10-2022 07:46 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]Coog High they are who we thought they were!


Better than Cincinnati…


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!
(09-10-2022 07:49 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2022 07:12 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2022 07:11 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]UH should be 0-2 but I will take 1-1

LMAO at Coog High


You mean should be 2-0*


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!

If you had a coach.


We do have a coach and he went 12-2 last year.


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!
(09-10-2022 07:50 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2022 07:49 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2022 07:12 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2022 07:11 PM)doss2 Wrote: [ -> ]UH should be 0-2 but I will take 1-1

LMAO at Coog High


You mean should be 2-0*


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!

If you had a coach.


We do have a coach and he went 12-2 last year.


Sent from the Warp via the ruinous powers of Chaos!

In case you forgot AAC Championship 2021 UC 35 Coog High 20.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's