If there is any wrangling over USM, Marshall, and Old D leaving early then it is directly related to the remaining group of five (LT, MTSU, WKU, FIU, and UTEP). The new cusa additions plus the other six older members leaving are on the sidelines in this matter and could care less. So these five want to burn the bridges then just throw the match because the gasoline has already been poured.
Mods, please move this ridiculous topic to the CUSA Realignment forum where it belongs.
Or better yet, the Smack Talk forum.
(01-21-2022 04:37 PM)high flyer Wrote: [ -> ]If there is any wrangling over USM, Marshall, and Old D leaving early then it is directly related to the remaining group of five (LT, MTSU, WKU, FIU, and UTEP). The new cusa additions plus the other six older members leaving are on the sidelines in this matter and could care less. So these five want to burn the bridges then just throw the match because the gasoline has already been poured.
Bwhaaaaahaaaaaahaaaaa! CUSA is living up to it's contracted agreement that we all signed. It is USM, Marshall, and ODU not living up to their obligations in the agreement. You are going to fit in perfectly in the Sunbelt.
(01-21-2022 04:37 PM)high flyer Wrote: [ -> ]If there is any wrangling over USM, Marshall, and Old D leaving early then it is directly related to the remaining group of five (LT, MTSU, WKU, FIU, and UTEP). The new cusa additions plus the other six older members leaving are on the sidelines in this matter and could care less. So these five want to burn the bridges then just throw the match because the gasoline has already been poured.
What are you talking about?
(01-21-2022 04:37 PM)high flyer Wrote: [ -> ]If there is any wrangling over USM, Marshall, and Old D leaving early then it is directly related to the remaining group of five (LT, MTSU, WKU, FIU, and UTEP). The new cusa additions plus the other six older members leaving are on the sidelines in this matter and could care less. So these five want to burn the bridges then just throw the match because the gasoline has already been poured.
Burn it. We don’t give a rip.
(01-21-2022 04:54 PM)FAU Connoisseur! Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2022 04:37 PM)high flyer Wrote: [ -> ]If there is any wrangling over USM, Marshall, and Old D leaving early then it is directly related to the remaining group of five (LT, MTSU, WKU, FIU, and UTEP). The new cusa additions plus the other six older members leaving are on the sidelines in this matter and could care less. So these five want to burn the bridges then just throw the match because the gasoline has already been poured.
what are you saying?
Nothing but b****ing. Notice that the fans of schools going to the AAC aren't over here on the CUSA forum behaving this way about the league.
I've taken particular notice. That's how I know which conference between the AAC and Sun Belt is commanding of more respect.
Only ones burning bridges is you 3
(01-21-2022 05:13 PM)All4One Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2022 04:54 PM)FAU Connoisseur! Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2022 04:37 PM)high flyer Wrote: [ -> ]If there is any wrangling over USM, Marshall, and Old D leaving early then it is directly related to the remaining group of five (LT, MTSU, WKU, FIU, and UTEP). The new cusa additions plus the other six older members leaving are on the sidelines in this matter and could care less. So these five want to burn the bridges then just throw the match because the gasoline has already been poured.
what are you saying?
Nothing but b****ing. Notice that the fans of schools going to the AAC aren't over here on the CUSA forum behaving this way about the league.
I've taken particular notice. That's how I know which conference between the AAC and Sun Belt is commanding of more respect.
I would not exactly consider you a ambassador of peace.
(01-21-2022 10:42 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2022 05:13 PM)All4One Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2022 04:54 PM)FAU Connoisseur! Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2022 04:37 PM)high flyer Wrote: [ -> ]If there is any wrangling over USM, Marshall, and Old D leaving early then it is directly related to the remaining group of five (LT, MTSU, WKU, FIU, and UTEP). The new cusa additions plus the other six older members leaving are on the sidelines in this matter and could care less. So these five want to burn the bridges then just throw the match because the gasoline has already been poured.
what are you saying?
Nothing but b****ing. Notice that the fans of schools going to the AAC aren't over here on the CUSA forum behaving this way about the league.
I've taken particular notice. That's how I know which conference between the AAC and Sun Belt is commanding of more respect.
I would not exactly consider you a ambassador of peace.
I'm not going to the AAC.
(01-21-2022 08:40 PM)BKTopper Wrote: [ -> ]Only ones burning bridges is you 3
Didn’t know posters on a message board had the power to burn Athletics departments bridges. Hi
(01-24-2022 11:48 AM)SouthernMissSNu Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2022 08:40 PM)BKTopper Wrote: [ -> ]Only ones burning bridges is you 3
Didn’t know posters on a message board had the power to burn Athletics departments bridges. Hi
According to the OP from USM apparently so.
And ODU has been pretty silent on all this. It’s mostly Marshall and USM
(01-26-2022 05:55 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-24-2022 04:58 PM)theATLDawg Wrote: [ -> ]And ODU has been pretty silent on all this. It’s mostly oNEMarshall fan and USM
FIFY
Yeah, let's not paint with such a broad brush. The schools and conferences will all do their best to take care of their interests. We fans have nothing to do with it.
Best of luck to all parties involved.