CSNbbs

Full Version: Best/Worst P5 Football Jobs?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
For those of you who can't get enough of these great bowls such as the Idaho Potato Bowl (I don't know who's playing nor do I care), I give you this thread.

Imagine if all of the P5 head football coaching jobs (you can count future Big 12 teams in this exercise) become available today. Assume no new recruiting allegations or criminal acts that would make any job less attractive. What would be the best/worst P5 head coaching jobs? If you could take any head coaching job, which one(s) would you take? How about the worst? I think the fact that arguably three top ten jobs this year (Oklahoma, Notre Dame, and Oregon) all opened not because of a firing, retirement, or even a move to the NFL, but because of a move to another head coaching job, makes this exercise relevant this year.

The obvious answer for the best would be Alabama but the man who takes that job is replacing Nick Saban. You have a better chance of success than any other program in the country but the highest expectations of anyone in the country. If you go 10-2 every year they will want your head on a silver platter. Win three national championships? You're not even half as good as Saban (and we haven't even gotten to Bear Bryant). Likewise, if you take Clemson's job you're replacing Dabo Swinney.

Obviously I'm biased but in 2021 going on 2022 I'm going to say Ohio State. Would you rather replace Nick Saban, Dabo Swinney, or ... Ryan Day? Ohio State certainly has a lot of tradition and high expectations but not the same. You're also not competing in the SEC. It is tougher to get recruits to come to Columbus if they don't like the cold but you're not facing Georgia, Florida, LSU, Auburn, and Texas A&M (and soon Oklahoma and Texas). I mean when even Ole Miss is in the top 25 most valuable football programs that's tough. No doubt I would love to be Alabama's head coach but if you gave me Alabama or Ohio State, I'll take Ohio State.

Other top jobs? Other than the obvious powerhouses, I'd have to think about places with lots of homegrown talent and/or desirable locations. Why did Lincoln Riley leave Oklahoma for USC? Could the fact that it is easier to attract recruits to Los Angeles than Oklahoma have figured into the decision? Or the fact that he would rather live in LA? Sure coaches would rather win but I'd rather win in California or Florida than insert name of undesirable state to live in. I know Mario Cristobal has ties to Miami but how many people would make the move from Miami to Oregon? Why didn't Chip Kelly make the move from UCLA to Oregon, probably a step up in football, and return home? I wouldn't leave Los Angeles for Eugene either.

The SEC pecking order is in a bit of a flux because of the uncertain nature after Oklahoma and Texas join. Will Alabama and Auburn join the SEC East? Will they go divisionless or go to pods? I think it's a bit overrated being in Alabama's division vs. not being in Alabama's division. Since Texas A&M and Missouri joined the SEC, Auburn, LSU, and Georgia have the same number of SEC Championships (one each). Most likely you're going to have to beat Alabama anyway whether it's a regular season game or the SEC Championship (Georgia did get lucky the year they won the SEC Championship but wound up playing Alabama in the national championship and losing). Were Auburn and LSU hurt by being in the SEC West any more than Georgia and Florida were helped by being in the SEC East? Not much.

In the Big Ten, Michigan and Penn State each have one Big Ten title while Wisconsin hasn't won any since they went to the East-West format. When Penn State won their Big Ten title, they got the Buckeyes at home. So did Michigan this past year. Wisconsin meanwhile lost the Big Ten Championship Game four times in eight years, three times to Ohio State and once to Penn State. What does winning a weak Big Ten West get them? No titles. If Penn State or Michigan can beat Ohio State, they go to the Big Ten Championship with OSU out of the picture. Wisconsin will have to beat Ohio State (or Penn State or Michigan) in Indy. It's easier to beat them on a neutral field than in Columbus but harder than at home. Georgia had Alabama in their home state this past month and still couldn't beat them.

So I don't think it will make that big a difference as to what the SEC divisions will be (if there are any). Unless Georgia fans really care much about their SEC Championship in 2017. I guess if you can't win the national championship, at least win the SEC. But after they lost to Alabama their SEC title was clearly tainted. Should Georgia fans be that upset if Alabama moves to the SEC East? In the long run, Georgia will have to beat Alabama to win the SEC nine out of ten times no matter what. But if you want to think it's better to be in the SEC West, maybe LSU, Texas A&M, Texas, and Oklahoma become better jobs. Texas hasn't had much success since Vince Young but NIL could change that.

Worst? Vanderbilt's probably one of the candidates, especially if Alabama and Auburn move to the East. Rutgers' recruiting class was ranked 7th in the Big Ten by 247 Sports this year, a good coach that can keep that talent home could do well there. Oregon State's probably a lousy job considering you'd have to compete with Oregon and Nike and deal with a not so nice location and conference (at least Vanderbilt is still in the SEC). Kansas is certainly one of the worst if not the worst P5 program on the field, not so nice location and conference. If you hate the cold, Syracuse (although at least their home games are inside and many of their away games are down south). Also, the closer you get to New York you might get a chance to get decent talent.

Also is there a scenario you would leave a P5 head coaching job for a G5 head coaching job, assuming the money is the same? For example, would you leave Vanderbilt for Memphis, Kansas for SMU? Assume UCF, Houston, and Cincinnati are P5's.

By my count this will be my 4000th post 02-13-banana
I think the best jobs are where it's easy to recruit.

It's easier to recruit when you're close to recruits' homes and you're by far the biggest football school in the region.

So it's not Alabama - their state is okay for # of recruits, and they have to share it with Auburn (and Auburn is a pretty big dog in their own right).

It's not Texas either. TX has lots of recruits, but Texas shares that pond with 2 other big dogs (Texas A&M and Oklahoma), and 4 decent Big 12 schools.

By that measure: Ohio State and LSU are the best jobs in the country. And maybe USC, just because they're by far the biggest football school in the biggest state and have an easier road to the championship than any SEC or Big Ten job.



The worst jobs are where it's hard to recruit. Factors like being in a low-recruit region, sharing mediocre recruiting home grounds with a bigger rival, having such a tough schedule that recruits think you'll never win. Washington State, Kansas, Wake Forest, Vanderbilt, Indiana, and Mississippi State are the worst by that consideration.

But for worst job, you also have to consider the pressure to win. So Kentucky, Indiana, and Kansas actually aren't that bad because you have zero pressure to win.

Adding in "fan expectations" might actually make slightly larger schools among the worst jobs: South Carolina, Iowa State, West Virginia, Arkansas, and Texas Tech.
(12-23-2021 03:51 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote: [ -> ]I think the best jobs are where it's easy to recruit.

It's easier to recruit when you're close to recruits' homes and you're by far the biggest football school in the region.

So it's not Alabama - their state is okay for # of recruits, and they have to share it with Auburn (and Auburn is a pretty big dog in their own right).

It's not Texas either. TX has lots of recruits, but Texas shares that pond with 2 other big dogs (Texas A&M and Oklahoma), and 4 decent Big 12 schools.

By that measure: Ohio State and LSU are the best jobs in the country. And maybe USC, just because they're by far the biggest football school in the biggest state and have an easier road to the championship than any SEC or Big Ten job.



The worst jobs are where it's hard to recruit. Factors like being in a low-recruit region, sharing mediocre recruiting home grounds with a bigger rival, having such a tough schedule that recruits think you'll never win. Washington State, Kansas, Wake Forest, Vanderbilt, Indiana, and Mississippi State are the worst by that consideration.

But for worst job, you also have to consider the pressure to win. So Kentucky, Indiana, and Kansas actually aren't that bad because you have zero pressure to win.

Adding in "fan expectations" might actually make slightly larger schools among the worst jobs: South Carolina, Iowa State, West Virginia, Arkansas, and Texas Tech.

You might include K-State with that bunch too, unfortunately...
(12-24-2021 01:29 AM)DawgNBama Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-23-2021 03:51 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote: [ -> ]I think the best jobs are where it's easy to recruit.

It's easier to recruit when you're close to recruits' homes and you're by far the biggest football school in the region.

So it's not Alabama - their state is okay for # of recruits, and they have to share it with Auburn (and Auburn is a pretty big dog in their own right).

It's not Texas either. TX has lots of recruits, but Texas shares that pond with 2 other big dogs (Texas A&M and Oklahoma), and 4 decent Big 12 schools.

By that measure: Ohio State and LSU are the best jobs in the country. And maybe USC, just because they're by far the biggest football school in the biggest state and have an easier road to the championship than any SEC or Big Ten job.



The worst jobs are where it's hard to recruit. Factors like being in a low-recruit region, sharing mediocre recruiting home grounds with a bigger rival, having such a tough schedule that recruits think you'll never win. Washington State, Kansas, Wake Forest, Vanderbilt, Indiana, and Mississippi State are the worst by that consideration.

But for worst job, you also have to consider the pressure to win. So Kentucky, Indiana, and Kansas actually aren't that bad because you have zero pressure to win.

Adding in "fan expectations" might actually make slightly larger schools among the worst jobs: South Carolina, Iowa State, West Virginia, Arkansas, and Texas Tech.

You might include K-State with that bunch too, unfortunately...

Bill Snyder in Manhattan, Kansas might be considered there what Dabo is in Clemson even though he never won a national championship. A coach starting there in 2022 won't be directly replacing Snyder but his name is on the stadium. I can't think of any head coaches at "South Carolina, Iowa State, West Virginia, Arkansas, and Texas Tech" other than the recent ones and I don't think any of them have achieved the status Snyder has at KSU.

A tough program by definition is when the talent level should produce X number of wins a year but the fans expect three or four wins more than that a year. Right now I would say Nebraska would be a good example.
The worst P5 job in the country has to be Kansas.
(12-23-2021 03:51 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote: [ -> ]I think the best jobs are where it's easy to recruit.

It's easier to recruit when you're close to recruits' homes and you're by far the biggest football school in the region.

So it's not Alabama - their state is okay for # of recruits, and they have to share it with Auburn (and Auburn is a pretty big dog in their own right).

It's not Texas either. TX has lots of recruits, but Texas shares that pond with 2 other big dogs (Texas A&M and Oklahoma), and 4 decent Big 12 schools.

By that measure: Ohio State and LSU are the best jobs in the country. And maybe USC, just because they're by far the biggest football school in the biggest state and have an easier road to the championship than any SEC or Big Ten job.



The worst jobs are where it's hard to recruit. Factors like being in a low-recruit region, sharing mediocre recruiting home grounds with a bigger rival, having such a tough schedule that recruits think you'll never win. Washington State, Kansas, Wake Forest, Vanderbilt, Indiana, and Mississippi State are the worst by that consideration.

But for worst job, you also have to consider the pressure to win. So Kentucky, Indiana, and Kansas actually aren't that bad because you have zero pressure to win.

Adding in "fan expectations" might actually make slightly larger schools among the worst jobs: South Carolina, Iowa State, West Virginia, Arkansas, and Texas Tech.

I believe you are right to put South Carolina at the top of that list. That's the least self-aware fan base I'm aware of and has been for decades.
Never forget when it comes to SC and the Gamecocks in particular - these are the same people who shelled a federal fort in 1861 causing Lincoln to invade the South. These are the same people that Andrew Jackson of all people threatened to march into the State and hang Senator Calhoun from a sour apple tree. These are the same people that left the ACC in 1971 despite having no where to go. These are the same people who partake of mustard BBQ.
(12-27-2021 08:03 PM)Statefan Wrote: [ -> ]Never forget when it comes to SC and the Gamecocks in particular - these are the same people who shelled a federal fort in 1861 causing Lincoln to invade the South. These are the same people that Andrew Jackson of all people threatened to march into the State and hang Senator Calhoun from a sour apple tree. These are the same people that left the ACC in 1971 despite having no where to go. These are the same people who partake of mustard BBQ.

Well you are right about the mustard and leaving the ACC.

The shelling came after soldiers refused to surrender the fort and return to their own country. South Carolina at that point had legally seceded from United States and they didn't want a foreign army on their soil.
(12-27-2021 08:34 PM)XLance Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-27-2021 08:03 PM)Statefan Wrote: [ -> ]Never forget when it comes to SC and the Gamecocks in particular - these are the same people who shelled a federal fort in 1861 causing Lincoln to invade the South. These are the same people that Andrew Jackson of all people threatened to march into the State and hang Senator Calhoun from a sour apple tree. These are the same people that left the ACC in 1971 despite having no where to go. These are the same people who partake of mustard BBQ.

Well you are right about the mustard and leaving the ACC.

The shelling came after soldiers refused to surrender the fort and return to their own country. South Carolina at that point had legally seceded from United States and they didn't want a foreign army on their soil.

I understand that XLance and I agree with you. In fact, Florida did something similar with Fort Pickens near Pensacola, FL and Alabama did something similar with Fort Morgan and Fort Gaines in the Mobile Bay, all for the same exact reason that South Carolina did.
Can we keep politics out of this forum?!
(01-03-2022 06:54 PM)Erictelevision Wrote: [ -> ]Can we keep politics out of this forum?!

It's not politics.....it's history.
(01-03-2022 06:54 PM)Erictelevision Wrote: [ -> ]Can we keep politics out of this forum?!

Don't you have a reserve in Ohio that you need to reclaim? Go get your portion of Lack Erie back before you lecture us on how we can joke about Sandlappers and their tempers in the Palmetto State. 04-cheers
I to topic, I think Georgia Tech has to be one of the worst P5 coaching jobs. Yes, you are in the state of Georgia, but this is the hierarchy for in-state recruits, IMO:

1. Georgia/Alabama
2. Auburn
3. Clemson/Tennessee
4. Vandy
5. Georgia Tech
6. Everyone else

Not many recruits have Georgia Tech on their minds. I will give Geoff Collins major props in that he has been enthusiastic about the job, but the sad reality is that Georgia Tech is near the bottom of the totem pole for Georgia football teams.

If I were a Georgia Tech coach (and thank God I am not!!), I would work to build a wall around metro Atlanta for recruiting, much like Miami Hurricanes' coaches have done with the city of Miami in the past.
Why is Vanderbilt so high in Atlanta?
It's easier to get into Vandy than it is to get into Tech, IMO.
Pretty much P5 job pays enough to where you are set for life after five years as long as you aren’t going completely crazy with your money. And most are in places where a decent size house doesn’t cost a million dollars.

So there are no bad P5 jobs. There are ones where winning is near impossible. But if you have enough in the bank after you get fired to where you never have to work again, who cares?
Reference URL's