05-17-2021, 09:09 AM
Pages: 1 2
05-17-2021, 09:11 AM
We can only hope and pray.
05-17-2021, 09:16 AM
Roberts and Cavanaugh will side with the leftist.
05-17-2021, 09:17 AM
Roberts will muck it up.
05-17-2021, 09:30 AM
They might give them abortion to fend off court packing. It’s all a game and unborn babies are reduced to collateral damage.
05-17-2021, 09:34 AM
(05-17-2021 09:16 AM)domer1978 Wrote: [ -> ]Roberts and Kavanaugh will side with the leftists.We’ll see.
For all his many failures, Roberts has cast some votes in a constitutional manner.
Three years ago, Brett Kavanaugh got to witness — up close and personal — the true nature of “the leftists” when his nomination went before the Senate. That’s the kind of experience few people would ever forget.
05-17-2021, 09:47 AM
Cavanaugh will rule with Roe v Wade.
05-17-2021, 09:50 AM
(05-17-2021 09:16 AM)domer1978 Wrote: [ -> ]Roberts and Cavanaugh will side with the leftist.
at least 4 justices agreed to review ...
aka rule of 4 ...
or granting certiorari ...
cert for short ...
CERTAIN JE NE SAIS QUOI
05-17-2021, 09:53 AM
(05-17-2021 09:47 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ]Cavanaugh will rule with Roe v Wade.
He has said as much many times he views RvW as established precedence. He could still rule on a very narrow interpretation of the case in future cases though.
05-17-2021, 09:58 AM
(05-17-2021 09:53 AM)bobdizole Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:47 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ]Cavanaugh will rule with Roe v Wade.
He has said as much many times he views RvW as established precedence. He could still rule on a very narrow interpretation of the case in future cases though.
I wonder why he considers it established precedence.
05-17-2021, 10:02 AM
(05-17-2021 09:58 AM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:53 AM)bobdizole Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:47 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ]Cavanaugh will rule with Roe v Wade.
He has said as much many times he views RvW as established precedence. He could still rule on a very narrow interpretation of the case in future cases though.
I wonder why he considers it established precedence.
A previous court ruled. That is precedence. Cavanaugh believes in the law and the process.
05-17-2021, 10:05 AM
(05-17-2021 10:02 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:58 AM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:53 AM)bobdizole Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:47 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ]Cavanaugh will rule with Roe v Wade.
He has said as much many times he views RvW as established precedence. He could still rule on a very narrow interpretation of the case in future cases though.
I wonder why he considers it established precedence.
A previous court ruled. That is precedence. Cavanaugh believes in the law and the process.
So by that guideline slavery should still be the law of the land rather than eradicated as immoral.
05-17-2021, 10:16 AM
(05-17-2021 10:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 10:02 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:58 AM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:53 AM)bobdizole Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:47 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ]Cavanaugh will rule with Roe v Wade.
He has said as much many times he views RvW as established precedence. He could still rule on a very narrow interpretation of the case in future cases though.
I wonder why he considers it established precedence.
A previous court ruled. That is precedence. Cavanaugh believes in the law and the process.
So by that guideline slavery should still be the law of the land rather than eradicated as immoral.
It was, until the constitution was amended.
That's how you change the law of the land, not through the courts.
2nd amendment people should know this well.
05-17-2021, 10:27 AM
(05-17-2021 10:16 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 10:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 10:02 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:58 AM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:53 AM)bobdizole Wrote: [ -> ]He has said as much many times he views RvW as established precedence. He could still rule on a very narrow interpretation of the case in future cases though.
I wonder why he considers it established precedence.
A previous court ruled. That is precedence. Cavanaugh believes in the law and the process.
So by that guideline slavery should still be the law of the land rather than eradicated as immoral.
It was, until the constitution was amended.
That's how you change the law of the land, not through the courts.
2nd amendment people should know this well.
Unless its a state's constitution and it deals with election law, then it apparently doesnt matter.
05-17-2021, 10:28 AM
(05-17-2021 09:17 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote: [ -> ]Roberts will muck it up.
don't need Roberts if you hold the 4 votes from the case they heard last summer before Barrett was on the court.
05-17-2021, 10:44 AM
(05-17-2021 10:16 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 10:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 10:02 AM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:58 AM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ](05-17-2021 09:53 AM)bobdizole Wrote: [ -> ]He has said as much many times he views RvW as established precedence. He could still rule on a very narrow interpretation of the case in future cases though.
I wonder why he considers it established precedence.
A previous court ruled. That is precedence. Cavanaugh believes in the law and the process.
So by that guideline slavery should still be the law of the land rather than eradicated as immoral.
It was, until the constitution was amended.
That's how you change the law of the land, not through the courts.
2nd amendment people should know this well.
Thank goodness for Republicans.
07-22-2021, 06:39 PM
07-22-2021, 07:33 PM
Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch are the only ones I trust fully.
Roberts is basically an activist just like the libs.
Kavanaugh I believe is already shaky and in time will be another Anthony Kennedy.
Barrett, I will believe it when I see it.
Roberts is basically an activist just like the libs.
Kavanaugh I believe is already shaky and in time will be another Anthony Kennedy.
Barrett, I will believe it when I see it.
07-22-2021, 09:48 PM
(07-22-2021 07:33 PM)chrisd11 Wrote: [ -> ]Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch are the only ones I trust fully.
Roberts is basically an activist just like the libs.
Kavanaugh I believe is already shaky and in time will be another Anthony Kennedy.
Barrett, I will believe it when I see it.
Kavanaugh believes in the law. The law already ruled on RvW. He is not likely to overturn it. He never has been.
07-23-2021, 07:07 AM
It was a fairy tale made up legal opinion where they came up with the result they wanted and the. worked backwards to try to justify it via penumbras and emanations.
This case will be decided backwards to front as well. They won’t touch it.
This case will be decided backwards to front as well. They won’t touch it.
Pages: 1 2