04-22-2021, 03:36 PM
mybe we can force the A5 to triple the amount of cfp payouts to the g5 by proposing a g5 break away and or a g5 playoffs
extortion is the name of the game...
extortion is the name of the game...
(04-22-2021 03:39 PM)Pony94 Wrote: [ -> ]They will laugh
(04-22-2021 03:39 PM)Pony94 Wrote: [ -> ]They will laugh
(04-22-2021 03:36 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]mybe we can force the A5 to triple the amount of cfp payouts to the g5 by proposing a g5 break away and or a g5 playoffs
extortion is the name of the game...
(04-22-2021 03:36 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]mybe we can force the A5 to triple the amount of cfp payouts to the g5 by proposing a g5 break away and or a g5 playoffs
extortion is the name of the game...
(04-22-2021 03:36 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]mybe we can force the A5 to triple the amount of cfp payouts to the g5 by proposing a g5 break away and or a g5 playoffs
extortion is the name of the game...
(04-22-2021 04:12 PM)UCbball21 Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2021 03:36 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]mybe we can force the A5 to triple the amount of cfp payouts to the g5 by proposing a g5 break away and or a g5 playoffs
extortion is the name of the game...
The A5 schools would love for the G5 to split from the CFP lol
(04-22-2021 04:11 PM)GoOwls111 Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2021 03:36 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]mybe we can force the A5 to triple the amount of cfp payouts to the g5 by proposing a g5 break away and or a g5 playoffs
extortion is the name of the game...
Extortion should always be in play/an option
(04-22-2021 04:39 PM)usffan Wrote: [ -> ]Oh look, JHS55 is proposing that we break away again.
USFFan
(04-22-2021 04:55 PM)jedclampett Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2021 04:39 PM)usffan Wrote: [ -> ]Oh look, JHS55 is proposing that we break away again.
USFFan
Not exactly. You're oversimplifying what he's written. What he's suggesting is a lot more subtle than what you seem to think he's suggesting.
What he suggested was that perhaps the G5 should propose the idea of breaking away in order to get something closer to equal treatment.
That's how people leverage their power.
It's like, if you get a job offer, you could just take the job with no questions asked about your salary or working conditions and not even try to leverage your other options, or you could make it clear that you have other options and won't necessarily take the gig if the compensation and working conditions aren't satisfactory, thus leveraging the power that you have in that situation.
The second option is usually the only way to get a better offer more effective than the first if one handles the situation deftly enough, because it at least demonstrates that you're not desperate to take the gig and puts one into a potential negotiating situation that one otherwise wouldn't be in.
.
(02-20-2020 09:45 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]I’d like to see a g5 playoff sometime soon but not just yet
If the g5 were offered a big chunk of money to do a real playoff “ ( conference champions and some wild cards, no committee)”, mybe this would change the minds of y’all naysayers
Throw in the fact that the A5 has a predetermined champion with their committee and we play at the same time on our network I think it has a great chance to showcase our better playoff product
I think a g5 split from the NCAA is a must, we need to make our own rules, set our own scholarship limits and all those kind of things
(04-22-2021 05:07 PM)usffan Wrote: [ -> ]oh gosh, now iam being quoted...(04-22-2021 04:55 PM)jedclampett Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2021 04:39 PM)usffan Wrote: [ -> ]Oh look, JHS55 is proposing that we break away again.
USFFan
Not exactly. You're oversimplifying what he's written. What he's suggesting is a lot more subtle than what you seem to think he's suggesting.
What he suggested was that perhaps the G5 should propose the idea of breaking away in order to get something closer to equal treatment.
That's how people leverage their power.
It's like, if you get a job offer, you could just take the job with no questions asked about your salary or working conditions and not even try to leverage your other options, or you could make it clear that you have other options and won't necessarily take the gig if the compensation and working conditions aren't satisfactory, thus leveraging the power that you have in that situation.
The second option is usually the only way to get a better offer more effective than the first if one handles the situation deftly enough, because it at least demonstrates that you're not desperate to take the gig and puts one into a potential negotiating situation that one otherwise wouldn't be in.
.
This isn't exactly new ground here...
https://csnbbs.com/thread-894687-post-16...id16690018
(02-20-2020 09:45 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]I’d like to see a g5 playoff sometime soon but not just yet
If the g5 were offered a big chunk of money to do a real playoff “ ( conference champions and some wild cards, no committee)”, mybe this would change the minds of y’all naysayers
Throw in the fact that the A5 has a predetermined champion with their committee and we play at the same time on our network I think it has a great chance to showcase our better playoff product
I think a g5 split from the NCAA is a must, we need to make our own rules, set our own scholarship limits and all those kind of things
USFFan
(04-22-2021 04:55 PM)Pony94 Wrote: [ -> ]now that’s the idea, so do you have any pictures?(04-22-2021 04:11 PM)GoOwls111 Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2021 03:36 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]mybe we can force the A5 to triple the amount of cfp payouts to the g5 by proposing a g5 break away and or a g5 playoffs
extortion is the name of the game...
Extortion should always be in play/an option
Can we get pics of them with hookers and blow?
(04-22-2021 06:19 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]at least jed clampet understands me...
(04-22-2021 05:40 PM)CliftonAve Wrote: [ -> ]It would take a unified approach from the non autonomous group (G5/Indy)
Quote:wherein schools would refuse to schedule the A5 OOC.
(04-22-2021 07:08 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2021 06:19 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]at least jed clampet understands me...
This is def. a candidate for addition to my sig.. Classic.
(04-22-2021 08:10 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2021 07:08 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2021 06:19 PM)JHS55 Wrote: [ -> ]at least jed clampet understands me...
This is def. a candidate for addition to my sig.. Classic.
i don’t know what this means...^^^
jed and i think alike...we see the writing on the wall... and we don’t like it