CSNbbs

Every wonder why NO democrat is contesting any State election where they lost by a slim margin?

Quote:New analysis of michigan voter data reveals hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots flagged as potentially fraudulent, leading statisticians to posit “strong evidence” exists that results were “manipulated by a computer algorithm.”

The “non-partisan effort by unpaid citizens and volunteer experts” and phds comes to the conclusion that an “audited recount” ought to be carried out in michigan counties that returned voting results that were statistically unlikely, if not impossible.

MAIL-IN MADNESS.

The report also raises concerns about Michigan election official’s conduct regarding mail-in balloting. Of the 3,507,129 ballots requested, the report flags hundreds of thousands of ballots with qualities, such as “duplicate ballot IDs,” “missing ballot address,” or “year of birth before 1921.”



The report explains in detail the various red flags, such as “288,783 [ballots] that have the application sent and ballot received on the same day.”

The data also includes the voter’s year of birth. One is 170 years old, likely an error but their application was not rejected. In total, more than 1400 of these absentee voters are over 100 years old. These could well be nursing home patients. There are 217,271 applications without a recorded date (i.e. never received back). More interesting is the 288,783 that have the application sent and ballot received on the same day.

COMPUTER INTERFERENCE.


The fifth section of the report, “Irrational MI Absentee Ballots Findings” also posits there is “very strong evidence that the absentee voting counts in Michigan have been manipulated by a computer algorithm.”

“On the surface, it would seem that the tabulating equipment in each precinct has been programmed to shift a percentage of absentee votes from Trump to Biden,” the report continues.

The allegations are premised on the fact that the absentee voting trends of Michigan counties deviate from the nationwide norm and that “the percentage of Democratic absentee voters exceeds the percentage of Republican absentee voters in every precinct.”

The picture below shows “normal (non-manipulated) absentee voting results should be,” representing “the actual percentage of absentee ballots received by each 2020 presidential candidate in a swing state county, by precinct (Red = R and Blue = D).”



And the plot below reveals a statistically unlikely trend in Monroe County.

“Specifically, save for outliers, the percentage of Democratic absentee voters exceeds the percentage of Republican absentee voters in every precinct. Even more remarkable – and unbelievable – these two independent variables appear to track one another,” the report notes.



A similar pattern emerges in Oakland County.

WAYNE & OAKLAND.
Two counties raised red flags to the statisticians concerning the spread of votes for Biden vs. President Trump. Wayne and Oakland Counties “stand out as problematic,” as the report concludes “40,000 and 46,000 estimated excessive votes, respectively” for Biden.

Concerning Wayne County:

What’s curious is that above the 2016 totals, a new vote ratio appears in contrast to the history of the area – showing new votes going 70% Democrat vs 30% Republican – a 15- point mismatch to the same area just in the last Presidential Election.

In 2016, Wayne county split 55 percent for Hillary Clinton and 45 percent for President Trump.

The other outlier county, Oakland, saw a similar “mismatch” between its 2016 and 2020 results:

In Oakland, all votes added by both candidates above the 2016 take show a new vote ratio of 72% Democrat to 28% Republican – an 18-point mismatch to the same area just since the last Presidential Election.

Link

That Monroe cty graph is a joke.

Another astonishing coincidence, I’m sure.

(11-28-2020 01:41 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: [ -> ]Every wonder why NO democrat is contesting any State election where they lost by a slim margin?

Quote:The report explains in detail the various red flags, such as “288,783 [ballots] that have the application sent and ballot received on the same day.”

Michigan allows you to pick up a ballot in person, and return it the same day. They don’t have traditional “early voting” with voting booths so people just fill it out when they get it and return it. Given the press around the post office before the election it is unsurprising a lot of people did this.

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/E...3273_7.pdf

I think most people realized what happened in this election, but it doesn't matter. It's not going to be overturned.

I just hope this gets fixed before the next election gets "fixed".

(11-28-2020 04:36 PM)bearcatfan Wrote: [ -> ]I think most people realized what happened in this election, but it doesn't matter. It's not going to be overturned.

I just hope this gets fixed before the next election gets "fixed".

The next election is the GA run-off in just a few weeks. Guessing there will be another "water leak" or maybe a "gas leak" this time that causes (almost) everyone to have to evacuate.

(11-28-2020 03:29 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 01:41 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: [ -> ]Every wonder why NO democrat is contesting any State election where they lost by a slim margin?

Quote:The report explains in detail the various red flags, such as “288,783 [ballots] that have the application sent and ballot received on the same day.”

Michigan allows you to pick up a ballot in person, and return it the same day. They don’t have traditional “early voting” with voting booths so people just fill it out when they get it and return it. Given the press around the post office before the election it is unsurprising a lot of people did this.

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/E...3273_7.pdf

These idiots don't listen to logic.

Graphs by random internet statisticians is not admissible evidence. Even Trump's own campaign isn't using such paper-thin arguments.

Get back to me when an actual reputable source does some of these analyses.

(11-28-2020 04:57 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote: [ -> ]Graphs by random internet statisticians is not admissible evidence. Even Trump's own campaign isn't using such paper-thin arguments.

Get back to me when an actual reputable source does some of these analyses.

What would your position be if the above graph was shown to be accurate by what you consider a reputable source? Would you consider it a weird anomaly or evidence of fraud?

(11-28-2020 04:57 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote: [ -> ]Graphs by random internet statisticians is not admissible evidence. Even Trump's own campaign isn't using such paper-thin arguments.

Get back to me when an actual reputable source does some of these analyses.

Maybe the democrats should show them their own graphs and statistics to refute the republicans. Should be easy but I haven’t seen any. Wondering why?

Cheaters

(11-28-2020 03:29 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 01:41 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: [ -> ]Every wonder why NO democrat is contesting any State election where they lost by a slim margin?

Quote:The report explains in detail the various red flags, such as “288,783 [ballots] that have the application sent and ballot received on the same day.”

Michigan allows you to pick up a ballot in person, and return it the same day. They don’t have traditional “early voting” with voting booths so people just fill it out when they get it and return it. Given the press around the post office before the election it is unsurprising a lot of people did this.

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/E...3273_7.pdf

lulz...another pdf....

(11-28-2020 06:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 03:29 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 01:41 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: [ -> ]Every wonder why NO democrat is contesting any State election where they lost by a slim margin?

Quote:The report explains in detail the various red flags, such as “288,783 [ballots] that have the application sent and ballot received on the same day.”

Michigan allows you to pick up a ballot in person, and return it the same day. They don’t have traditional “early voting” with voting booths so people just fill it out when they get it and return it. Given the press around the post office before the election it is unsurprising a lot of people did this.

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/E...3273_7.pdf

lulz...another pdf....

I forgot you can’t read, I’ll sketch it up in crayon if I get a chance.

Keep working on those phonics, you’ll get there one day little buddy.

(11-28-2020 06:02 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 03:29 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 01:41 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: [ -> ]Every wonder why NO democrat is contesting any State election where they lost by a slim margin?

Quote:The report explains in detail the various red flags, such as “288,783 [ballots] that have the application sent and ballot received on the same day.”

Michigan allows you to pick up a ballot in person, and return it the same day. They don’t have traditional “early voting” with voting booths so people just fill it out when they get it and return it. Given the press around the post office before the election it is unsurprising a lot of people did this.

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/E...3273_7.pdf

lulz...another pdf....

I forgot you can’t read, I’ll sketch it up in crayon if I get a chance.

Keep working on those phonics, you’ll get there one day little buddy.

but muh pdf!

(11-28-2020 06:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:02 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 03:29 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 01:41 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: [ -> ]Every wonder why NO democrat is contesting any State election where they lost by a slim margin?

Michigan allows you to pick up a ballot in person, and return it the same day. They don’t have traditional “early voting” with voting booths so people just fill it out when they get it and return it. Given the press around the post office before the election it is unsurprising a lot of people did this.

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/E...3273_7.pdf

lulz...another pdf....

I forgot you can’t read, I’ll sketch it up in crayon if I get a chance.

Keep working on those phonics, you’ll get there one day little buddy.

but muh pdf!

These guys are taking applications, perhaps they can help you

(11-28-2020 05:52 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 04:57 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote: [ -> ]Graphs by random internet statisticians is not admissible evidence. Even Trump's own campaign isn't using such paper-thin arguments.

Get back to me when an actual reputable source does some of these analyses.

Maybe the democrats should show them their own graphs and statistics to refute the republicans. Should be easy but I haven’t seen any. Wondering why?

"Republicans" aren't showing any graphs. It's random internet commenters.

If the RNC or Mitch McConnell says something, then I'll listen to the evidence they present. Just like I listened to the idiots in the DNC who brought forth "evidence" of collusion with Russia.

If Trump & the RNC aren't willing to believe this graph, then why should I?

(11-28-2020 05:36 PM)banker Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 04:57 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote: [ -> ]Graphs by random internet statisticians is not admissible evidence. Even Trump's own campaign isn't using such paper-thin arguments.

Get back to me when an actual reputable source does some of these analyses.

What would your position be if the above graph was shown to be accurate by what you consider a reputable source? Would you consider it a weird anomaly or evidence of fraud?

My job is to smell out fishy anomalies in statistical data. I always evaluate the data source before the conclusion. I've gotten to the point in my career where I won't even waste my time evaluating an analysis if the data source is b.s. Garbage In = Garbage Out.

(11-28-2020 03:04 PM)JMUDunk Wrote: [ -> ]That Monroe cty graph is a joke.

Another astonishing coincidence, I’m sure.

#muhMirrorEffectViaAlgorithm

those biatches only have balls to cheat...their platform is dogshite....other than that, it's cliNtON popping...

we live in dumbfk-land.......and dems know it!

(11-28-2020 06:21 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:02 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 03:29 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]Michigan allows you to pick up a ballot in person, and return it the same day. They don’t have traditional “early voting” with voting booths so people just fill it out when they get it and return it. Given the press around the post office before the election it is unsurprising a lot of people did this.

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/E...3273_7.pdf

lulz...another pdf....

I forgot you can’t read, I’ll sketch it up in crayon if I get a chance.

Keep working on those phonics, you’ll get there one day little buddy.

but muh pdf!

These guys are taking applications, perhaps they can help you

I saw that place! Wasn’t it in Minneapolis?

(11-28-2020 09:01 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:21 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:02 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 06:00 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]lulz...another pdf....

I forgot you can’t read, I’ll sketch it up in crayon if I get a chance.

Keep working on those phonics, you’ll get there one day little buddy.

but muh pdf!

These guys are taking applications, perhaps they can help you

I saw that place! Wasn’t it in Minneapolis?

Looks like it may not be open any longer. Terrible accident.

(11-28-2020 07:36 PM)stinkfist Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-28-2020 03:04 PM)JMUDunk Wrote: [ -> ]That Monroe cty graph is a joke.

Another astonishing coincidence, I’m sure.

#muhMirrorEffectViaAlgorithm

those biatches only have balls to cheat...their platform is dogshite....other than that, it's cliNtON popping...

we live in dumbfk-land.......and dems know it!

Some know it and they don't give a damn. No code thr anoral fricks.

They told us...by any means necessary.