(11-24-2020 10:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, this should be fun.
Zero place for this to go. First off—-how would random person have any standing in objecting to a legal dispute in which they are not a party? I don’t like that the ACLU is suing to stop construction of the Southern Border Wall—judge make ‘em stop? Yeah—right.
So they should throw out all the Lin Wood lawsuits in Georgia because they don’t have trump as the plaintiff?
I actually asked that question earlier about Sydney—who is her client? You have to have standing to sue.
(11-24-2020 10:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, this should be fun.
Zero place for this to go. First off—-how would random person have any standing in objecting to a legal dispute in which they are not a party? I don’t like that the ACLU is suing to stop construction of the Southern Border Wall—judge make ‘em stop? Yeah—right.
So they should throw out all the Lin Wood lawsuits in Georgia because they don’t have trump as the plaintiff?
I actually asked that question earlier about Sydney—who is her client? You have to have standing to sue.
Lin Wood's case has been accepted so he certainly has standing.
"Ellis provided Breitbart News with a screen grab of text messages from an unknown person who attempted to provoke her to respond, ending with: “You’re a f**king c**t. You’re the reason people despise humanity. You deserved to be raped.”
(11-24-2020 10:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, this should be fun.
Zero place for this to go. First off—-how would random person have any standing in objecting to a legal dispute in which they are not a party? I don’t like that the ACLU is suing to stop construction of the Southern Border Wall—judge make ‘em stop? Yeah—right.
So they should throw out all the Lin Wood lawsuits in Georgia because they don’t have trump as the plaintiff?
I actually asked that question earlier about Sydney—who is her client? You have to have standing to sue.
Lin Wood's case has been accepted so he certainly has standing.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
Quote:WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court on Friday handed another loss to the Trump campaign’s effort to undo President-elect Joe Biden’s win in Pennsylvania, with a judge — one of Trump’s nominees — writing that the campaign’s “claims have no merit.”
In a 3-0 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit rejected the campaign’s effort to get a do-over of its lawsuit challenging the election results in Pennsylvania, which a lower court had already tossed out last week.
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote in a 3-0 decision from the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit.
(11-25-2020 09:08 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]Zero place for this to go. First off—-how would random person have any standing in objecting to a legal dispute in which they are not a party? I don’t like that the ACLU is suing to stop construction of the Southern Border Wall—judge make ‘em stop? Yeah—right.
So they should throw out all the Lin Wood lawsuits in Georgia because they don’t have trump as the plaintiff?
I actually asked that question earlier about Sydney—who is her client? You have to have standing to sue.
Lin Wood's case has been accepted so he certainly has standing.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
(11-26-2020 08:31 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]So they should throw out all the Lin Wood lawsuits in Georgia because they don’t have trump as the plaintiff?
I actually asked that question earlier about Sydney—who is her client? You have to have standing to sue.
Lin Wood's case has been accepted so he certainly has standing.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
(11-26-2020 08:31 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]So they should throw out all the Lin Wood lawsuits in Georgia because they don’t have trump as the plaintiff?
I actually asked that question earlier about Sydney—who is her client? You have to have standing to sue.
Lin Wood's case has been accepted so he certainly has standing.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
In other words, you are backpeddling.
Not surprised that he is backpedaling, U_Of_Elvis is know for doing that.
(11-26-2020 08:31 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote: [ -> ]So they should throw out all the Lin Wood lawsuits in Georgia because they don’t have trump as the plaintiff?
I actually asked that question earlier about Sydney—who is her client? You have to have standing to sue.
Lin Wood's case has been accepted so he certainly has standing.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
In other words, you are backpeddling.
Not surprised that he is backpedaling, U_Of_Elvis is know for doing that.
Quote:WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court on Friday handed another loss to the Trump campaign’s effort to undo President-elect Joe Biden’s win in Pennsylvania, with a judge — one of Trump’s nominees — writing that the campaign’s “claims have no merit.”
In a 3-0 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit rejected the campaign’s effort to get a do-over of its lawsuit challenging the election results in Pennsylvania, which a lower court had already tossed out last week.
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote in a 3-0 decision from the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
In other words, you are backpeddling.
Not surprised that he is backpedaling, U_Of_Elvis is know for doing that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You guys want to stop jibberjabbering and point out where I backpedaled? I’ll hang up and listen.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
In other words, you are backpeddling.
Not surprised that he is backpedaling, U_Of_Elvis is know for doing that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You guys want to stop jibberjabbering and point out where I backpedaled? I’ll hang up and listen.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
In other words, you are backpeddling.
Not surprised that he is backpedaling, U_Of_Elvis is know for doing that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You guys want to stop jibberjabbering and point out where I backpedaled? I’ll hang up and listen.
The lawsuit against trump is by Michigan voters and an organization representing Michigan voters. My point in asking about Lin Wood was that they have the same standing he does.
In other words, you are backpeddling.
Not surprised that he is backpedaling, U_Of_Elvis is know for doing that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You guys want to stop jibberjabbering and point out where I backpedaled? I’ll hang up and listen.
