Better. I’ve always thought we should go by SBC more often.
I think it's a good logo, but I think the current one is fine. It's only six years old, anyway.
It can probably be mistaken for SEC too closely. That's the one big negative about going by the initials.
I imagine that each school would get one in their colors. This looks good with USA's colors, but it might look rougher with others.
Thought it was a rule we change logos when we change commissioners. Not crazy about SBC. Most say Belt so why not that?
I like it, but I also think T-Dog has a point.
I mean, if people see a South Alabama game on TV and think we are in the SEC then that’s on them. Years ago people on this board really wanted us to go by SBC. Maybe we’re about to finally do that.
That logo is hideous. Looks straight out of the 90's.
(03-29-2020 02:15 PM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote: [ -> ]That logo is hideous. Looks straight out of the 90's.
One of the worst logos I’ve ever seen. The previous one was gorgeous.
It’s better than the dumb one we have now they replaced a better one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
According to this, that logo is our new logo going forward. I have to say, I'm partial to our current logo. This one looks very old school to me.
It looks good with South Alabama's colors, but some of our schools' colors are going to look strange especially on a green field. I'm assuming Georgia Southern's will be navy blue on the bottom, white on the top, with a gold sun.
(03-30-2020 09:03 AM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote: [ -> ]
According to this, that logo is our new logo going forward. I have to say, I'm partial to our current logo. This one looks very old school to me.
It looks good with South Alabama's colors, but some of our schools' colors are going to look strange especially on a green field. I'm assuming Georgia Southern's will be navy blue on the bottom, white on the top, with a gold sun.
I'm not sure about it.
I do like the idea of the using "SBC". I just don't know about this logo... maybe it looks better in person because this photo is so grainy.
That particular logo looks like one of Herb Tarlek's sport coats.
Going by "SBC" is good for the conference. It fixes the common problem of being labeled the "Sunbelt."
That said, the design is horrible. The circular sun was great, and looked good on uniforms. Huge step back.
Yikes. I loved the circle logo. It didn't look like your typical DIII logo, which is what this new logo looks like to me.
Love the new logo. Makes us look more legit and less like an HVAC company from LaGrange.
(03-30-2020 01:02 PM)ah59396 Wrote: [ -> ]Love the new logo. Makes us look more legit and less like an HVAC company from LaGrange.
![[Image: 139306.jpg]](https://i.imgflip.com/139306.jpg)
(03-30-2020 01:11 PM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote: [ -> ] (03-30-2020 01:02 PM)ah59396 Wrote: [ -> ]Love the new logo. Makes us look more legit and less like an HVAC company from LaGrange.
Stick around, it might grow on ya.
(03-30-2020 12:16 PM)Brosef Wrote: [ -> ]Going by "SBC" is good for the conference. It fixes the common problem of being labeled the "Sunbelt."
That said, the design is horrible. The circular sun was great, and looked good on uniforms. Huge step back.
Just changing what they call us "SBC" vs "Sun Belt" doesn't automatically change the stigma that most have with the conference. I also dislike the new logo. I think we are fine with what we have now.