Should we hear back soon? Maybe shortly after our game vs NC St.?
And do you guys think a few games will get shaved off? I’m hoping we get James back for the Georgia game. That would still be a 10 game suspension.
Heard on the radio that the meeting is tomorrow and it will most likely be next week some time before we get an answer.
(11-26-2019 05:09 PM)memtigbb Wrote: [ -> ]Heard on the radio that the meeting is tomorrow and it will most likely be next week some time before we get an answer.
Thanks man!
What’s your thought on reducing the number of games?
(11-26-2019 05:13 PM)Joe1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-26-2019 05:09 PM)memtigbb Wrote: [ -> ]Heard on the radio that the meeting is tomorrow and it will most likely be next week some time before we get an answer.
Thanks man!
What’s your thought on reducing the number of games?
If what they did to Missouri is any indication, we are not going to get any reduction.
Well, I'm not holding my breath. It is, after all, the NCAA.
They’ll make it up as they capriciously go along.
(11-26-2019 06:13 PM)holyterror Wrote: [ -> ]They’ll make it up as they capriciously go along.
+3 LOVE that sentence structure!
I thought we had a good case argument, with the he’s eligible, he isn’t eligible but that was our mistake so he can play, then he isn’t eligible??
(11-26-2019 06:41 PM)Joe1 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought we had a good case argument, with the he’s eligible, he isn’t eligible but that was our mistake so he can play, then he isn’t eligible??
I think the answer here is that some of us (me included) believed everything positive about the situation and none of the negative. I believed the NCAA had been told everything before making a decision. Apparently that was not true. I believed U of Memphis had gotten official clearance for James, but that wasn’t true. The school, apparently, had been told that he likely would be ineligible and they were playing him at their own risk. The moral: Don’t believe everything you hear.
IMO, the suspension terms will be upheld...hate it but I bet that's what happens
(11-26-2019 07:30 PM)eastcoastDave Wrote: [ -> ] (11-26-2019 06:41 PM)Joe1 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought we had a good case argument, with the he’s eligible, he isn’t eligible but that was our mistake so he can play, then he isn’t eligible??
I think the answer here is that some of us (me included) believed everything positive about the situation and none of the negative. I believed the NCAA had been told everything before making a decision. Apparently that was not true. I believed U of Memphis had gotten official clearance for James, but that wasn’t true. The school, apparently, had been told that he likely would be ineligible and they were playing him at their own risk. The moral: Don’t believe everything you hear.
I think the purpose of the Lawsuit was to force the NCAA to agree to terms prior to sitting him.
(11-26-2019 07:35 PM)450bench Wrote: [ -> ]IMO, the suspension terms will be upheld...hate it but I bet that's what happens
Now if we were Duke......
(11-26-2019 05:13 PM)Joe1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-26-2019 05:09 PM)memtigbb Wrote: [ -> ]Heard on the radio that the meeting is tomorrow and it will most likely be next week some time before we get an answer.
Thanks man!
What’s your thought on reducing the number of games?
I want to be positive and think they will reduce it by a few games, but chances are likely they don't reduce it at all.
(11-26-2019 07:55 PM)memtigbb Wrote: [ -> ] (11-26-2019 05:13 PM)Joe1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-26-2019 05:09 PM)memtigbb Wrote: [ -> ]Heard on the radio that the meeting is tomorrow and it will most likely be next week some time before we get an answer.
Thanks man!
What’s your thought on reducing the number of games?
I want to be positive and think they will reduce it by a few games, but chances are likely they don't reduce it at all.
I'll say 3 game reduction.
I think a few games will get shaved off.
Can an appeal open you up to harsher penalties? If so, then I think the best case is that the ruling stands.
(11-26-2019 08:05 PM)snowtiger Wrote: [ -> ] (11-26-2019 07:55 PM)memtigbb Wrote: [ -> ] (11-26-2019 05:13 PM)Joe1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-26-2019 05:09 PM)memtigbb Wrote: [ -> ]Heard on the radio that the meeting is tomorrow and it will most likely be next week some time before we get an answer.
Thanks man!
What’s your thought on reducing the number of games?
I want to be positive and think they will reduce it by a few games, but chances are likely they don't reduce it at all.
I'll say 3 game reduction.
Why not!
I heard they changed their mind again. Additional 12 games added on, just because.
(11-26-2019 11:51 PM)TigerNationStandUp Wrote: [ -> ]I heard they changed their mind again. Additional 12 games added on, just because.
Please don't give them any ideas!!