CSNbbs

Full Version: Zach in CFL Playoffs
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
4:30 ESPN2.

Winnipeg vs Calvary.
(11-10-2019 03:16 PM)Bcatbog Wrote: [ -> ]4:30 ESPN2.

Winnipeg vs Calvary.

Watching the CFL game.
Much more entertaining than the professional football that was allegedly played at PBS.
Zach just had a 72 yard completion for TD to give his team an eleven point lead in 4th quarter.
(11-10-2019 06:52 PM)cincybb51 Wrote: [ -> ]Zach just had a 72 yard completion for TD to give his team an eleven point lead in 4th quarter.

Zack headed to the Western Grey Cup
Steubenville's finest still has a lot of gas left in the tank.
Would've lost a lot of money 10 years ago if you had told me that of our 2 QBs Zach would still be a pro 10 years later while Tony would be doing local radio.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
I bet Collaros' team wins after forcing a QB fumble and returning a pick 6.
(11-21-2019 12:49 PM)dsquare Wrote: [ -> ]Who'da thunk it?

https://twitter.com/GoBearcatsFB/status/...5050603521

That is really cool! I'm going to have to try to check that game out.
(11-22-2019 03:39 PM)Bcatbog Wrote: [ -> ]https://winnipegsun.com/sports/football/...th-bombers

Great Bearcat! Would love to see him come back and coach someday.
6 pm tonight

more fun than NFL
(11-21-2019 05:18 PM)Bearhawkeye Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-21-2019 12:49 PM)dsquare Wrote: [ -> ]Who'da thunk it?

https://twitter.com/GoBearcatsFB/status/...5050603521

That is really cool! I'm going to have to try to check that game out.

That is awesome.
(11-21-2019 05:18 PM)Bearhawkeye Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-21-2019 12:49 PM)dsquare Wrote: [ -> ]Who'da thunk it?

https://twitter.com/GoBearcatsFB/status/...5050603521

That is really cool! I'm going to have to try to check that game out.

Hey Bearhawkeye. Quick request related to your signatures. Part of why I come to this board is to avoid politics. With a few notable exceptions, people steer clear on the board. Can you please leave it out of your signatures?
(11-24-2019 12:21 PM)geef Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-21-2019 05:18 PM)Bearhawkeye Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-21-2019 12:49 PM)dsquare Wrote: [ -> ]Who'da thunk it?

https://twitter.com/GoBearcatsFB/status/...5050603521

That is really cool! I'm going to have to try to check that game out.

Hey Bearhawkeye. Quick request related to your signatures. Part of why I come to this board is to avoid politics. With a few notable exceptions, people steer clear on the board. Can you please leave it out of your signatures?

I'm not sure why you couldn't pm your thoughts (or even start a broader OT thread on the issue) but since you put it out here to me specifically, I hear you and I agree it's generally better left off this primarily UC sports board. But it's kind of a fine line especially when you see political protests stopping a college football game like we saw Saturday (oops, is it OK to mention that here?) Maybe I've toed the line a few times, but I think my stuff is typically quite mild and is usually only political in the broadest sense. I guess technically anything observing (either pro or con) political correctness is "political" since it's part of the term, but is a 40-year-old comedy clip (that you obviously don't have to play) really ruining your experience here regardless of your political beliefs? I'm not looking to offend, but I guess my point and perhaps a point of the clip is that everything doesn't need to be done to satisfy the absolute lowest common denominator, especially when it comes to free speech. As another part of my sig notes, comedy specifically is supposed to be about being funny, not applause (although I suppose one could claim that's a "political" opinion as well if that's their mindset.)

But that's what we have mods for and I note that the sig of at least one also could be interpreted as having political connotations (broadly defined and not that I have any problem with it). So I don't think I've crossed many lines by very much, if at all - especially for any lengthy time periods since I tend to change it up frequently (including many that are not at all political regardless of how incredibly broadly you define it.) In sum, I hear and actually agree with you that this board is about sports rather than politics and that there are plenty of other places for that material. So I'll try to keep your concerns in mind with regard to my sigs, but I'm not inclined to dumb everything down to ensure that nobody could possibly see anything I post as having any political connotations whatsoever that they might actually think about (and perhaps even enjoy or at least find funny).
Zach up 15 at half. Great half show with Keith Urban.
The field has two 50 yard lines! Those crazy Canucks!
(11-24-2019 07:04 PM)Bearhawkeye Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-24-2019 12:21 PM)geef Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-21-2019 05:18 PM)Bearhawkeye Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-21-2019 12:49 PM)dsquare Wrote: [ -> ]Who'da thunk it?

https://twitter.com/GoBearcatsFB/status/...5050603521

That is really cool! I'm going to have to try to check that game out.

Hey Bearhawkeye. Quick request related to your signatures. Part of why I come to this board is to avoid politics. With a few notable exceptions, people steer clear on the board. Can you please leave it out of your signatures?

I'm not sure why you couldn't pm your thoughts (or even start a broader OT thread on the issue) but since you put it out here to me specifically, I hear you and I agree it's generally better left off this primarily UC sports board. But it's kind of a fine line especially when you see political protests stopping a college football game like we saw Saturday (oops, is it OK to mention that here?) Maybe I've toed the line a few times, but I think my stuff is typically quite mild and is usually only political in the broadest sense. I guess technically anything observing (either pro or con) political correctness is "political" since it's part of the term, but is a 40-year-old comedy clip (that you obviously don't have to play) really ruining your experience here regardless of your political beliefs? I'm not looking to offend, but I guess my point and perhaps a point of the clip is that everything doesn't need to be done to satisfy the absolute lowest common denominator, especially when it comes to free speech. As another part of my sig notes, comedy specifically is supposed to be about being funny, not applause (although I suppose one could claim that's a "political" opinion as well if that's their mindset.)

But that's what we have mods for and I note that the sig of at least one also could be interpreted as having political connotations (broadly defined and not that I have any problem with it). So I don't think I've crossed many lines by very much, if at all - especially for any lengthy time periods since I tend to change it up frequently (including many that are not at all political regardless of how incredibly broadly you define it.) In sum, I hear and actually agree with you that this board is about sports rather than politics and that there are plenty of other places for that material. So I'll try to keep your concerns in mind with regard to my sigs, but I'm not inclined to dumb everything down to ensure that nobody could possibly see anything I post as having any political connotations whatsoever that they might actually think about (and perhaps even enjoy or at least find funny).

I wasn't trying to call you out - I just don't check PMs and wasn't sure if others did as well. I appreciate your response, and your consideration.
Blue Bombers end a 28 year Grey Cup drought led by Zach (who got traded to them with one game left in the regular season). Joining Nick Davila as former Bearcat QBs who are two (or more) time champs in pro football leagues.

https://winnipegsun.com/sports/football/...tiger-cats
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's