https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/11/and...narrative/
Review of McCarthy's book. Lots of detail on the Obama's administration abuses.
"We can expect a lot of forthcoming books about the Robert Mueller investigation, but Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book, Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency, is unique in that it focuses on events leading up to the investigation. In fact, his book ends with Rod Rosenstein’s surprise announcement that he was appointing a special counsel, the very thing Democrats had been hoping for all along.
McCarthy contends that the real collusion in the 2016 election was between the Obama administration and the Hillary Clinton campaign. McCarthy argues that the Obama Department of Justice and the FBI first colluded to protect Hillary Clinton from being indicted for having a private and illegal email server, believing and hoping she would be the next president.
Then the Obama administration employed counter-intelligence resources to investigate ties between Donald Trump and Russia, first in the hopes it would taint his campaign, and then after the election with the knowledge that it would neuter his presidency and hinder a second term...."
This is what Ive been saying all along---and its what the IG and other currently ongoing investigations are going to finally make public.
(10-12-2019 11:36 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]This is what Ive been saying all along---and its what the IG and other currently ongoing investigations are going to finally make public.
Oh, yeah? Don't hold your breath. I don't believe it...At. All.
(10-12-2019 02:26 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 11:36 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]This is what Ive been saying all along---and its what the IG and other currently ongoing investigations are going to finally make public.
Oh, yeah? Don't hold your breath. I don't believe it...At. All.
Then I would say you are ignoring a mountain of documented evidence for the sake of pulling for a specific side.
And I'm an indy, not an R, and certainly not a Trump voter. In fact, I initially believed that Trump did in fact collude with Russia. Until the evidence showed what really happened.
(10-12-2019 02:26 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 11:36 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]This is what Ive been saying all along---and its what the IG and other currently ongoing investigations are going to finally make public.
Oh, yeah? Don't hold your breath. I don't believe it...At. All.
Yeah, I'll believe it when I see it. The truth is a non-factor in any of this.
(10-12-2019 04:29 PM)TripleA Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 02:26 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 11:36 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]This is what Ive been saying all along---and its what the IG and other currently ongoing investigations are going to finally make public.
Oh, yeah? Don't hold your breath. I don't believe it...At. All.
Then I would say you are ignoring a mountain of documented evidence for the sake of pulling for a specific side.
And I'm an indy, not an R, and certainly not a Trump voter. In fact, I initially believed that Trump did in fact collude with Russia. Until the evidence showed what really happened.
He's not saying he doesn't believe it happened, just he believes they will get away with it.
(10-12-2019 07:17 PM)banker Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 04:29 PM)TripleA Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 02:26 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 11:36 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]This is what Ive been saying all along---and its what the IG and other currently ongoing investigations are going to finally make public.
Oh, yeah? Don't hold your breath. I don't believe it...At. All.
Then I would say you are ignoring a mountain of documented evidence for the sake of pulling for a specific side.
And I'm an indy, not an R, and certainly not a Trump voter. In fact, I initially believed that Trump did in fact collude with Russia. Until the evidence showed what really happened.
He's not saying he doesn't believe it happened, just he believes they will get away with it.
The real question is will the results be made public prior to November 2020? That's what I have my doubts about. It will be just like the Bureaucracy to sit and delay until it has no impact on the next election and then to public acclaim admit they sat on the results for fear of impacting the election, a lot like Hillary's server issues which they are still obfuscating.
(10-12-2019 07:17 PM)banker Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 04:29 PM)TripleA Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 02:26 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2019 11:36 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]This is what Ive been saying all along---and its what the IG and other currently ongoing investigations are going to finally make public.
Oh, yeah? Don't hold your breath. I don't believe it...At. All.
Then I would say you are ignoring a mountain of documented evidence for the sake of pulling for a specific side.
And I'm an indy, not an R, and certainly not a Trump voter. In fact, I initially believed that Trump did in fact collude with Russia. Until the evidence showed what really happened.
He's not saying he doesn't believe it happened, just he believes they will get away with it.
Well, I certainly think that's a possibility.