sounds like it's time to take over the canucks....
how any oz. of human flesh doesn't understand why warming isn't a good thingy, is beyond my ability to comprehend....
it's pollution you stupid 'tree hugging irritants'....
(10-10-2019 04:42 PM)stinkfist Wrote: [ -> ]sounds like it's time to take over the canucks....
how any oz. of human flesh doesn't understand why warming is a good thingy, is beyond my ability to comprehend....
it's pollution you stupid 'tree hugging irritants'....
It is really good for Canada. They could become the world's breadbasket.
(10-10-2019 08:37 PM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2019 04:42 PM)stinkfist Wrote: [ -> ]sounds like it's time to take over the canucks....
how any oz. of human flesh doesn't understand why warming isn't a good thingy, is beyond my ability to comprehend....
it's pollution you stupid 'tree hugging irritants'....
It is really good for Canada. They could become the world's breadbasket.
w/o question....what's not to like about a monster land mass with resources and a future shipping lane in mother nature's teat...
(10-10-2019 09:26 PM)q5sys Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2019 08:37 PM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2019 04:42 PM)stinkfist Wrote: [ -> ]sounds like it's time to take over the canucks....
how any oz. of human flesh doesn't understand why warming is a good thingy, is beyond my ability to comprehend....
it's pollution you stupid 'tree hugging irritants'....
It is really good for Canada. They could become the world's breadbasket.
Is it good for every other country that she lists in her twitter thread, that also is warming at twice the rate of the rest of the world? (What the links are for)
it was a given the coastal land masses at the 45 degree mark are in a pickle for those surrounded by water....
twice the average rate.....and what would that rate be over billions of years....notice how most fail to mention that aspect...
lmfao at micro 'pseudo measuring' as science....
https://eos.org/articles/million-degree-...ar-science
"Experiments at Sun-like temperatures show that certain elements absorb more light than solar models predict, creating uncertainties for stellar science...."
They can't even understand why Iron has less opacity at higher temperatures, yet they can predict the vastly more complicated change in climate over the next hundred years. But its "settled science."
"Settled science" means they can't defend their work.
(10-16-2019 08:15 AM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ]"Settled science" means they can't defend their work.
Science is never "settled." It's inherent in the scientific method.
F=ma was "settled science" for a couple of centuries, until Einstein came up with relativity.
"Settled science" is not settled.
