CSNbbs

Full Version: Emoluments clause
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/...m-is-dead/

Points out the absurdity of the media's emolument obsession, dissecting each scandal one at a time.

"...But to see how much the corruption narrative really is a media creation, you have only to compare it to how the mainstream media covered what might have been a similar question in the past. Imagine if journalists had treated every appearance by Obama as a book promotion. What if his every speech had been slandered across the channels as corruption, Obama just out there pimping his books? Should he have been impeached for commercializing the office of president?

Follow the money, as Rachel Maddow likes to say. The Trump Organization pays to the Treasury all profits from foreign governments. In 2018, that was $191,000. The year before, the amount was $151,470. So Trump’s in-pocket profit is zero.

Meanwhile, Obama’s profit as an author during his time in office was $15.6 million (he’s made multiples more since, including a $65 million book advance). In the two weeks before he was inaugurated, Obama reworked his book deals to take advantage of his new status. He agreed not to publish another non-fiction book during his time in office to keep anticipation high, while signing a $500,000 advance for a young adult version of Dreams From My Father.

Obama’s books were huge sellers in China, where publishing is largely government controlled, meaning he likely received Chicom money in the Oval Office. His own State Department bought $79,000 worth of his books to distribute as gifts.

As with Trump, nothing Obama did was illegal. There are no laws per se against a president making money. Yet no one bothered to raise ethical questions...."
(09-26-2019 02:58 PM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.theamericanconservative.com/...m-is-dead/

Points out the absurdity of the media's emolument obsession, dissecting each scandal one at a time.

"...But to see how much the corruption narrative really is a media creation, you have only to compare it to how the mainstream media covered what might have been a similar question in the past. Imagine if journalists had treated every appearance by Obama as a book promotion. What if his every speech had been slandered across the channels as corruption, Obama just out there pimping his books? Should he have been impeached for commercializing the office of president?

Follow the money, as Rachel Maddow likes to say. The Trump Organization pays to the Treasury all profits from foreign governments. In 2018, that was $191,000. The year before, the amount was $151,470. So Trump’s in-pocket profit is zero.

Meanwhile, Obama’s profit as an author during his time in office was $15.6 million (he’s made multiples more since, including a $65 million book advance). In the two weeks before he was inaugurated, Obama reworked his book deals to take advantage of his new status. He agreed not to publish another non-fiction book during his time in office to keep anticipation high, while signing a $500,000 advance for a young adult version of Dreams From My Father.

Obama’s books were huge sellers in China, where publishing is largely government controlled, meaning he likely received Chicom money in the Oval Office. His own State Department bought $79,000 worth of his books to distribute as gifts.

As with Trump, nothing Obama did was illegal. There are no laws per se against a president making money. Yet no one bothered to raise ethical questions.

I hate to lay this on ya bubby, but when you're the black hey-zeus from Chi-town, you pretty much have free reign w/o consequence or worry....how that dipshite got reelected is hardly surprising...

to even give thought that ethics is a viable component for today's democrat is an oxymoron every day and the eighth one...

#shiTTTsickensMe

edit: at least in '79/80, the electorate was smart enough to not reelect peanut goon....
BUT MUH MAGA HATS!

03-hissyfit 03-lmfao
The funny thing about emoluments is.... Trump's business has fallen off a cliff since he became President.

Trump's business model was primarily to lease his name out to real estate developers. The "Trump" brand means high-end luxury, and before 2015 naming your hotel "Trump" would draw wealthy customers like a Holiday Inn Express draws middle class families.

But the wealthy don't like President Trump's politics. Even those who are ambivilent about Trump realize how toxic his name is and don't want to be seen at a Trump branded property.
I found a few links to articles about the declining value of the Trump brand:

Both of these articles agree with what real estate professionals have been telling me since 2015. (I used to work for a large commercial REIT until the Recession and still have friends in the industry)


Trump’s businesses take a hit as the brand ‘has lost its mojo’
- MarketWatch 12/2018



Blaming Political Climate, Trumps Give Up on New Hotels - NYT, Feb 2019
(09-26-2019 09:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-26-2019 02:58 PM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.theamericanconservative.com/...m-is-dead/

Points out the absurdity of the media's emolument obsession, dissecting each scandal one at a time.

"...But to see how much the corruption narrative really is a media creation, you have only to compare it to how the mainstream media covered what might have been a similar question in the past. Imagine if journalists had treated every appearance by Obama as a book promotion. What if his every speech had been slandered across the channels as corruption, Obama just out there pimping his books? Should he have been impeached for commercializing the office of president?

Follow the money, as Rachel Maddow likes to say. The Trump Organization pays to the Treasury all profits from foreign governments. In 2018, that was $191,000. The year before, the amount was $151,470. So Trump’s in-pocket profit is zero.

Meanwhile, Obama’s profit as an author during his time in office was $15.6 million (he’s made multiples more since, including a $65 million book advance). In the two weeks before he was inaugurated, Obama reworked his book deals to take advantage of his new status. He agreed not to publish another non-fiction book during his time in office to keep anticipation high, while signing a $500,000 advance for a young adult version of Dreams From My Father.

Obama’s books were huge sellers in China, where publishing is largely government controlled, meaning he likely received Chicom money in the Oval Office. His own State Department bought $79,000 worth of his books to distribute as gifts.

As with Trump, nothing Obama did was illegal. There are no laws per se against a president making money. Yet no one bothered to raise ethical questions.

I hate to lay this on ya bubby, but when you're the black hey-zeus from Chi-town, you pretty much have free reign w/o consequence or worry....how that dipshite got reelected is hardly surprising...

to even give thought that ethics is a viable component for today's democrat is an oxymoron every day and the eighth one...

#shiTTTsickensMe

edit: at least in '79/80, the electorate was smart enough to not reelect peanut goon....

You mean "MAGA Country" between 1-4am right? That place?
Reference URL's