At least according to the ACC front office. At best this gives UNC a chance at a Hail Mary. Would they show their @ss for any other team? Not for FSU when a legal lateral pass changed the outcome of the FSU vs Miami game last year. This does not change the Carolina bias perception but rather re-enforces it.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st...nd-vs-wake
UNC player who danced around for several seconds before deciding "oh, I should get out of bounds" should still be running sprints for being a dumba$$.
(09-14-2019 01:32 PM)Pervis_Griffith Wrote: [ -> ]UNC player who danced around for several seconds before deciding "oh, I should get out of bounds" should still be running sprints for being a dumba$$.
That's right. And in the process, he allowed his forward motion to be stopped while he was still in bounds with no timeouts left. It didn't matter that he eventually stepped out of bounds with 1 second left on the clock, because the play was over inbounds and no reason to stop the clock.
Wake deserved to win that game.
No other school would have a response from the ACC office before Monday.
The clock operator in Charlottesville should have stopped the clock after FSUs first down, instead it continued to run where FSU had to rush a play instead of spiking. FSU is stopped after a minimal game on the 2 yard line.
Ok front office, demonstrate you are not bias.