College Football Ranking Composite
https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
AAC:
18 UCF AAC
35 Cincinnati AAC
53 Memphis AAC
63 Temple AAC
71 Houston AAC
79 South Florida AAC
81 Tulane AAC
94 SMU AAC
103 Navy AAC
105 Tulsa AAC
114 East Carolina AAC
128 Connecticut AAC
26 Boise St MWC
41 Army FBSI
54 BYU FBSI
82 Buffalo MAC
86 Air Force MWC
UConn is third from the last. After their departure, the gap between the AAC and the G-4 should widen.
(08-16-2019 08:05 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]UConn is third from the last. After their departure, the gap between the AAC and the G-4 should widen.
So how come the MWC had a higher one than the AAC last year? If you are a P6, give up the Access bid. Delusions are fun.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
(08-16-2019 09:18 AM)Jjoey52 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-16-2019 08:05 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]UConn is third from the last. After their departure, the gap between the AAC and the G-4 should widen.
So how come the MWC had a higher one than the AAC last year? If you are a P6, give up the Access bid. Delusions are fun.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
You gotta take that sh**!
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/3gNosJC7MIhDZ4Hay1/giphy.gif)
(08-16-2019 09:18 AM)Jjoey52 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-16-2019 08:05 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]UConn is third from the last. After their departure, the gap between the AAC and the G-4 should widen.
So how come the MWC had a higher one than the AAC last year? If you are a P6, give up the Access bid. Delusions are fun.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Historically bad year by the AAC and historically good year by the mwc and mwc edges AAC out by an eyelash. Here are the relative numbers between the two over the last 6 years:
2018, mwc by 2.61
2017, AAC by 17.12
2016, AAC by 9.78
2015, AAC by 17.84
2014, mwc by 7.2
2013, AAC by 6.99
If you can't see that there is a clear advantage to the AAC, then I can't help you anymore.
(08-16-2019 10:02 AM)slhNavy91 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-16-2019 09:18 AM)Jjoey52 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-16-2019 08:05 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]UConn is third from the last. After their departure, the gap between the AAC and the G-4 should widen.
So how come the MWC had a higher one than the AAC last year? If you are a P6, give up the Access bid. Delusions are fun.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Historically bad year by the AAC and historically good year by the mwc and mwc edges AAC out by an eyelash. Here are the relative numbers between the two over the last 6 years:
2018, mwc by 2.61
2017, AAC by 17.12
2016, AAC by 9.78
2015, AAC by 17.84
2014, mwc by 7.2
2013, AAC by 6.99
If you can't see that there is a clear advantage to the AAC, then I can't help you anymore.
A lot closer than the AAC is to the nearest P league.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
(08-16-2019 03:00 PM)Jjoey52 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-16-2019 10:02 AM)slhNavy91 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-16-2019 09:18 AM)Jjoey52 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-16-2019 08:05 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]UConn is third from the last. After their departure, the gap between the AAC and the G-4 should widen.
So how come the MWC had a higher one than the AAC last year? If you are a P6, give up the Access bid. Delusions are fun.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Historically bad year by the AAC and historically good year by the mwc and mwc edges AAC out by an eyelash. Here are the relative numbers between the two over the last 6 years:
2018, mwc by 2.61
2017, AAC by 17.12
2016, AAC by 9.78
2015, AAC by 17.84
2014, mwc by 7.2
2013, AAC by 6.99
If you can't see that there is a clear advantage to the AAC, then I can't help you anymore.
A lot closer than the AAC is to the nearest P league.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Well, actually...
In 2017 AND 2015, AAC was closer to the #5 contract-bowl-conference than to the mwc.
In 2016, the gap between AAC and mwc was 58% of the gap between AAC and #5.
Not mwc, but in 2017 AAC was closer to #1 than to the bottom two G4 conferences.
(08-16-2019 08:51 PM)TripleA Wrote: [ -> ]Memphis #53? Joke.
Yep, that is just plain lazy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk