CSNbbs

Full Version: NCAA Net Performance
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
15 Sweet 16 teams were ranked in the Top 18 of the NET. The Oregon/UCI winner is the only outlier.

The interesting thing is that the committee seeded Kansas & Kansas St better than the NET suggested (actual 4 seeds as compared to worst 5th seed/worst 6th seed in the NET), and both failed to make the Sweet 16.

Now, KenPom also had 15 Sweet 16 teams in his Top 18 at the end of the conference tournaments. KenPom also would have seeded Kansas a 5 and Kansas St a 6.

The main difference between NET and KenPom: Houston (4th NET, 15th KenPom). The two rankings agree on the other seven teams predicted to make the Elite 8.
(03-24-2019 10:31 PM)CougarRed Wrote: [ -> ]15 Sweet 16 teams were ranked in the Top 18 of the NET. The Oregon/UCI winner is the only outlier.

The interesting thing is that the committee seeded Kansas & Kansas St better than the NET suggested (actual 4 seeds as compared to worst 5th seed/worst 6th seed in the NET), and both failed to make the Sweet 16.

Now, KenPom also had 15 Sweet 16 teams in his Top 18 at the end of the conference tournaments. KenPom also would have seeded Kansas a 5 and Kansas St a 6.

The main difference between NET and KenPom: Houston (4th NET, 15th KenPom). The two rankings agree on the other seven teams predicted to make the Elite 8.

Even more than that, the NET is 15-0 in rd 2 and looking like 16-0 with Oregon- and now 43-9 thru rd 2.
That's because tourn is following chalk
Which it usually does in 22nd round
(03-25-2019 12:58 AM)templefootballfan Wrote: [ -> ]That's because tourn is following chalk
Which it usually does in 22nd round

A 22-round NCAA Tournament would be amazing.

The Arkansas Tech Wonder Boys would win year after year after year. COGS
Reference URL's