Auburn made 3/4 free throws. 75%.
UVA hit a big three then the fatal ending.
After UVA missed two free throws during the Auburn stretch where they made three threes to get the lead.
Go Texas Tech.
(04-06-2019 07:13 PM)Unionman76 Wrote: [ -> ]Virginia protected
What ****** basketball
More conspiracy theorists on this board than with the Kennedy assassination. And only took him about 2 minutes. Impressive.
He hit him while the ball was still in his hands, it was a foul. A little bitty piece of a second later...Auburn wins.
Virginia plays the most boring brand of basketball ever! Since the shot clock.
(04-06-2019 07:18 PM)Unionman76 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-06-2019 07:15 PM)tigerlands Wrote: [ -> ] (04-06-2019 07:13 PM)Unionman76 Wrote: [ -> ]Virginia protected
What ****** basketball
Clearly he was fouled. What are you talking about? That's on Auburn.
No double dribble on Virginia,
Game would be over
Could be on the double dribble. Still, all Auburn has to do is stay away from the shooter and they win.
(04-06-2019 07:21 PM)cmt Wrote: [ -> ]He hit him while the ball was still in his hands, it was a foul. A little bitty piece of a second later...Auburn wins.
Virginia plays the most boring brand of basketball ever! Since the shot clock.
A TT/Virginia final would put people to sleep by the first commercial break.
(04-06-2019 07:21 PM)tigerlands Wrote: [ -> ] (04-06-2019 07:18 PM)Unionman76 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-06-2019 07:15 PM)tigerlands Wrote: [ -> ] (04-06-2019 07:13 PM)Unionman76 Wrote: [ -> ]Virginia protected
What ****** basketball
Clearly he was fouled. What are you talking about? That's on Auburn.
No double dribble on Virginia,
Game would be over
Could be on the double dribble. Still, all Auburn has to do is stay away from the shooter and they win.
Maybe, but I think hitting the shooter in the leg affected it.
Virginia plays ugly but they really do okay great defense and great discipline.
So much so that when down four with 15 seconds left they were still moving slow, making a shot with 7 seconds left.
Will be an interesting final regardless.
They did miss the double dribble and the foul before the double dribble.
(04-06-2019 07:19 PM)Stammers Wrote: [ -> ]People complain when the refs swallow their whistles at the end of games and now they complain when a ref has the guts to make an OBVIOUS call.
Like the double dribble?
Biggest free throws since Rumeal Robinson in the Michigan Seton Hall final in 1989.
Believe there were three seconds or so in that game but Michigan went from one down to one up.
(04-06-2019 07:21 PM)cmt Wrote: [ -> ]He hit him while the ball was still in his hands, it was a foul. A little bitty piece of a second later...Auburn wins.
Virginia plays the most boring brand of basketball ever! Since the shot clock.
Whether he has the ball in his hands or not does not matter. The player has the right to come down without being folded. It was clearly a foul.
(04-06-2019 07:27 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ]They did miss the double dribble and the foul before the double dribble.
while I agree, the refs could have also called an intentional foul right after that because Auburn just grabbed his jersey and made no play on the ball whatsoever, at least imo.
(04-06-2019 07:27 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ]They did miss the double dribble and the foul before the double dribble.
Agree...when he kicked the ball the Auburn kid grabbed the front of his jersey before he gathered the ball. Those calls get missed but they do seem to even out.
Had they not called a foul non the three UVA would be upset but guarantee you Bennett would not have made a big deal about it.
I mean it’s technically a foul but isn’t called 95% of the time and probably wouldn’t be called the other way around. Boneheaded decision by Auburn to even be in that situation.
(04-06-2019 07:34 PM)bluecrew Wrote: [ -> ] (04-06-2019 07:27 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ]They did miss the double dribble and the foul before the double dribble.
while I agree, the refs could have also called an intentional foul right after that because Auburn just grabbed his jersey and made no play on the ball whatsoever, at least imo.
That is really immaterial. The non-call on the double-dribble was the difference. Should’ve been Auburn’s ball and GAME OVER. SUCH BS!
Checked CBS College Sports thinking they may be covering Pearl.
Bull riding.
I assume Wyoming dominates.
(04-06-2019 07:39 PM)MtownTigers916 Wrote: [ -> ]I mean it’s technically a foul but isn’t called 95% of the time and probably wouldn’t be called the other way around. Boneheaded decision by Auburn to even be in that situation.
Disagree.
That style of contact is usually called.
(04-06-2019 07:40 PM)hsvtiger Wrote: [ -> ] (04-06-2019 07:34 PM)bluecrew Wrote: [ -> ] (04-06-2019 07:27 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ]They did miss the double dribble and the foul before the double dribble.
while I agree, the refs could have also called an intentional foul right after that because Auburn just grabbed his jersey and made no play on the ball whatsoever, at least imo.
That is really immaterial. The non-call on the double-dribble was the difference. Should’ve been Auburn’s ball and GAME OVER. SUCH BS!
Well I'm just saying they missed calls both ways. You're right, the double dribble came first, so the intentional wouldn't have been called. But that was an intentional foul.